<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Sacramento, 50 mbps broadband on tap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Comcast to Twin Cites: Want WideBand? Gonna Cost You Big - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-869097</link>
		<dc:creator>Comcast to Twin Cites: Want WideBand? Gonna Cost You Big - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-869097</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] upstream capability is based on DOCSIS 3.0 technology and will cost $150 a month. Cablevision, Surewest and Verizon have been offering similar high-speed yet very expensive connections for a while [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] upstream capability is based on DOCSIS 3.0 technology and will cost $150 a month. Cablevision, Surewest and Verizon have been offering similar high-speed yet very expensive connections for a while [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-446502</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-446502</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I think might have the fastest residential internet connection in the US.  I have a fiber gigabit connection to my home from Paxio.net and I easily hit the download limits of local servers (eg: the local LUG&#039;s ftp server that can only do 100mb).  Sorry, FIOS folks, but your connection isn&#039;t &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; uber.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think might have the fastest residential internet connection in the US.  I have a fiber gigabit connection to my home from Paxio.net and I easily hit the download limits of local servers (eg: the local LUG&#8217;s ftp server that can only do 100mb).  Sorry, FIOS folks, but your connection isn&#8217;t <em>that</em> uber.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Internet (Apparently) Isn&#8217;t Ready For IPTV</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-446122</link>
		<dc:creator>The Internet (Apparently) Isn&#8217;t Ready For IPTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-446122</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] also pay much less, $0.22/Mbps to our $3.10/Mbps. And to think companies brag about a $260/month 50 Mbps connection in [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also pay much less, $0.22/Mbps to our $3.10/Mbps. And to think companies brag about a $260/month 50 Mbps connection in [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Move Over Moore&#8217;s Law, Bandwidth is the New Limit on Computing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-371981</link>
		<dc:creator>Move Over Moore&#8217;s Law, Bandwidth is the New Limit on Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-371981</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Senator Stevens). They also pay much less, $0.22/Mbps to our $3.10/Mbps. And to think companies brag about a $260/month 50 Mbps connection in [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Senator Stevens). They also pay much less, $0.22/Mbps to our $3.10/Mbps. And to think companies brag about a $260/month 50 Mbps connection in [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Cali Capital Goes WiFi &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-238173</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM Cali Capital Goes WiFi &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-238173</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Written by Katie Fehrenbacher  Friday, June 22, 2007 at 8:02 AM PT &#124; No comments   The capital of California (by politics, not culture - sorry guys) is a step closer to getting its 90-square mile WiFi network. Last night the Sacramento city council approved an agreement for a WiFi network that will be built and operated by an organization called Sacramento Metro Connect, made up by Azulstar, Cisco Systems, Intel and SeaKay. When (if) this network goes live, the CaliCapital would be one of the more advanced broadband cities in the state. Surewest, a small independent telecom operator has wired up the city and offers ultra broadband speeds to its customers as an option. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Written by Katie Fehrenbacher  Friday, June 22, 2007 at 8:02 AM PT | No comments   The capital of California (by politics, not culture &#8211; sorry guys) is a step closer to getting its 90-square mile WiFi network. Last night the Sacramento city council approved an agreement for a WiFi network that will be built and operated by an organization called Sacramento Metro Connect, made up by Azulstar, Cisco Systems, Intel and SeaKay. When (if) this network goes live, the CaliCapital would be one of the more advanced broadband cities in the state. Surewest, a small independent telecom operator has wired up the city and offers ultra broadband speeds to its customers as an option. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93563</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 04:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93563</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Japan too has had 50 Mbps since 2004, for $30 a month&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan too has had 50 Mbps since 2004, for $30 a month</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thacker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93562</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93562</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Once again, I have FiOS at 30 Mbps down and 5 Mbps up for $54.95 / month.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not actually $170 a month anywhere that I know of.  For some crazy reason, Verizon advertises that insane rate as their &quot;national&quot; rate, but here in Northern VA at least, it&#039;s much cheaper in reality.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, I have FiOS at 30 Mbps down and 5 Mbps up for $54.95 / month.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s not actually $170 a month anywhere that I know of.  For some crazy reason, Verizon advertises that insane rate as their &#8220;national&#8221; rate, but here in Northern VA at least, it&#8217;s much cheaper in reality.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93561</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93561</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just wanted to say hi and I liked your article about me. One thing i wanted to add was its actually 260 a month with the tv included in the bundle. I use a voip service to save a bit. It really was worth the upgrade tho.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the nice read!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say hi and I liked your article about me. One thing i wanted to add was its actually 260 a month with the tv included in the bundle. I use a voip service to save a bit. It really was worth the upgrade tho.</p>

<p>Thanks for the nice read!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine WEB</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93560</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine WEB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93560</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;REMEMBER - Everything that we are WOWing and  OOOHing and AAHing over at the moment - will probably  be mainstream in one decade&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REMEMBER &#8211; Everything that we are WOWing and  OOOHing and AAHing over at the moment &#8211; will probably  be mainstream in one decade</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitperbit &#187; ADSL, los contrastes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93555</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitperbit &#187; ADSL, los contrastes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93555</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] In Sacramento, 50 mbps broadband on tap (GigaOm)   Ver m&#225;s de: Internet   Trackback a este post  Esta entrada fue escrita el: Mi&#233;rcoles 21 de Marzo de 2007  Comparte este post    Anterior: &#171; Arte instantáneo con Qbesq &#124; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Sacramento, 50 mbps broadband on tap (GigaOm)   Ver m&aacute;s de: Internet   Trackback a este post  Esta entrada fue escrita el: Mi&eacute;rcoles 21 de Marzo de 2007  Comparte este post    Anterior: &laquo; Arte instantáneo con Qbesq | [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Moura</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93559</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93559</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om, you forgot about the other Cable TV company serving San Francisco and some of the cities in San Mateo County - Astound.Net, formerly known as RCN of California.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Today, Astound/RCN is offering Internet Cable Modem downstream speeds of 10 Mbps in parts of San Francisco, Daly City, South San Francisco, Burlingame, Redwood City and San Mateo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Given that Sacramento is a couple of hours away from San Francisco, we wonder when our local incumbents - Comcast and AT&amp;T - will boost our speeds. We are still stuck at 6 Mbps! Sigh! &lt;&lt;&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, you forgot about the other Cable TV company serving San Francisco and some of the cities in San Mateo County &#8211; Astound.Net, formerly known as RCN of California.</p>

<p>Today, Astound/RCN is offering Internet Cable Modem downstream speeds of 10 Mbps in parts of San Francisco, Daly City, South San Francisco, Burlingame, Redwood City and San Mateo.</p>

<blockquote>
  </blockquote>

<blockquote>
    <p>Given that Sacramento is a couple of hours away from San Francisco, we wonder when our local incumbents &#8211; Comcast and AT&amp;T &#8211; will boost our speeds. We are still stuck at 6 Mbps! Sigh! &lt;&lt;</p>
  </blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Cuthrell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93551</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Cuthrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93551</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Considering how many FTTH projects meant to deliver triple play, this isn&#039;t that big a stretch really.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is only impressive if you consider there to be a wealth of content and service available at their head end.... Internet performance would likely be as poor as any other oversubscribed ISP.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering how many FTTH projects meant to deliver triple play, this isn&#8217;t that big a stretch really.</p>

<p>This is only impressive if you consider there to be a wealth of content and service available at their head end&#8230;. Internet performance would likely be as poor as any other oversubscribed ISP.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93557</link>
		<dc:creator>tomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93557</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Marketing information is sometimes deceiving so here are a couple things to note about Surewest offering;  the 50mbps is on their network, not on the internet, meaning you aren&#039;t guaranteed a 50meg pipe to the internet, it would only take 80 subscribers to eat up their entire upstream capacity.  They purchase upstream transit and have around 4gigs of capacity connecting their network to the rest of the world, two from L3 and two from someone else...i think Sprint but could be mistaken.  They use the fiber to the home to deliver every service they offer; VoiP, HDTV, data, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marketing information is sometimes deceiving so here are a couple things to note about Surewest offering;  the 50mbps is on their network, not on the internet, meaning you aren&#8217;t guaranteed a 50meg pipe to the internet, it would only take 80 subscribers to eat up their entire upstream capacity.  They purchase upstream transit and have around 4gigs of capacity connecting their network to the rest of the world, two from L3 and two from someone else&#8230;i think Sprint but could be mistaken.  They use the fiber to the home to deliver every service they offer; VoiP, HDTV, data, etc.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvind Satyanarayan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93546</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvind Satyanarayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93546</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And in the UAE, residential broadband remains at 512K with some lucky people on 1 mbps&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in the UAE, residential broadband remains at 512K with some lucky people on 1 mbps</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93547</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93547</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;how on earth are you people getting these blazing speeds? surely you&#039;re not using pots lines or cable, but fiber?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how on earth are you people getting these blazing speeds? surely you&#8217;re not using pots lines or cable, but fiber?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juris Kaza</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93548</link>
		<dc:creator>Juris Kaza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/50megs-sacramento/#comment-93548</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here in Latvia, I get 5Mbps down, 512kbps up on DSL for around USD 35 per month. My wife and I keep a place in Stockholm where 100 Mbps down and  10 Mbps (??)up is part of the rent (the fee for a coop apartment). In parts of Riga, Lattelecom already offers 10 Mbps, as do several competing ISPs. It looks like my Riga connection will jump to 10 Mbps as IPTV is launched (for ordinary TV sets, with new modems and decoders). 24 Mbps DSL is around the corner. 3.6 Mbps HSDPA is available from three mobile operators, as is 1 - 2 Mbps EV DO internet. Both of these wireless services may see speed leaps during 2007. Alas, poor Om :).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Latvia, I get 5Mbps down, 512kbps up on DSL for around USD 35 per month. My wife and I keep a place in Stockholm where 100 Mbps down and  10 Mbps (??)up is part of the rent (the fee for a coop apartment). In parts of Riga, Lattelecom already offers 10 Mbps, as do several competing ISPs. It looks like my Riga connection will jump to 10 Mbps as IPTV is launched (for ordinary TV sets, with new modems and decoders). 24 Mbps DSL is around the corner. 3.6 Mbps HSDPA is available from three mobile operators, as is 1 &#8211; 2 Mbps EV DO internet. Both of these wireless services may see speed leaps during 2007. Alas, poor Om :).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
