<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter, Misunderstood?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:36:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaanji</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaanji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Open API is going to allow innovation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open API is going to allow innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Twitter Leaves the Nest</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; Twitter Leaves the Nest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] little South by Southwest love, a lot of mainstream press ink, and some overloaded servers have convinced Obvious to turn Twitter, [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] little South by Southwest love, a lot of mainstream press ink, and some overloaded servers have convinced Obvious to turn Twitter, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daily.gigaom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daily.gigaom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] at how much Silicon Valley lags when it comes to wireless. A few weeks ago, people were treating Twitter as the new shiny shiny. SMS-based group messaging&#8230; for Koreans and Japanese, that is so retro. The web-part is nice, [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at how much Silicon Valley lags when it comes to wireless. A few weeks ago, people were treating Twitter as the new shiny shiny. SMS-based group messaging&#8230; for Koreans and Japanese, that is so retro. The web-part is nice, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin kristiseter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martin kristiseter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Am I the only one sick and tired of hearing about slow US adoption of SMS?  That only the teens are sending these intrusive messages?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Take a look at the stats and it will show the real story.  Ex. the average SMS user in the US is 36 years old (..and getting older).  Deal No Deal is doing alright, driving 1 million+ messages a night at $0.99 a pop.  Better yet, its target demo is women, 36-54 yrs old.  Same goes for American Idol....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The SMS adoption is booming in the US and we keep doubling our usage every year.  We&#039;ll keep seeing fantastic usage now that traditional media players in radio and TV are integrating it into their programming.   Let&#039;s leave the &quot;slow adoption&quot; stories once and for all.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one sick and tired of hearing about slow US adoption of SMS?  That only the teens are sending these intrusive messages?</p>
<p>Take a look at the stats and it will show the real story.  Ex. the average SMS user in the US is 36 years old (..and getting older).  Deal No Deal is doing alright, driving 1 million+ messages a night at $0.99 a pop.  Better yet, its target demo is women, 36-54 yrs old.  Same goes for American Idol&#8230;.</p>
<p>The SMS adoption is booming in the US and we keep doubling our usage every year.  We&#8217;ll keep seeing fantastic usage now that traditional media players in radio and TV are integrating it into their programming.   Let&#8217;s leave the &#8220;slow adoption&#8221; stories once and for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Om, I think your age ranges are a bit off. I think anyone under 35, in the US, is pretty comfortable with SMS -- not just twenty-somethings and younger. Whether they are comfortable with Twitter&#039;s implementation or even their carrier&#039;s SMS billing scheme is another question.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;broadstuff, the key to Shannon&#039;s law is how you define information. If you and I agreed that the code 0101 would represent a specific 100 MB file you already had on your computer, it would seem that I can transmit 100 MB to you by only using a four bits. That is not the case, however. For the purpose of the law, a bit is just a bit, regardless of what it may mean to you. Under the law, useful information is that which is meaningful without any a priori knowledge. So, a QAM16 constellation can at most represent 4 bits of data and nothing more. Using a cryptographic method to make those 4 bits represent some larger set of data is complete irrelevant and outside of Shannon&#039;s Law.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, I think your age ranges are a bit off. I think anyone under 35, in the US, is pretty comfortable with SMS &#8212; not just twenty-somethings and younger. Whether they are comfortable with Twitter&#8217;s implementation or even their carrier&#8217;s SMS billing scheme is another question.</p>
<p>broadstuff, the key to Shannon&#8217;s law is how you define information. If you and I agreed that the code 0101 would represent a specific 100 MB file you already had on your computer, it would seem that I can transmit 100 MB to you by only using a four bits. That is not the case, however. For the purpose of the law, a bit is just a bit, regardless of what it may mean to you. Under the law, useful information is that which is meaningful without any a priori knowledge. So, a QAM16 constellation can at most represent 4 bits of data and nothing more. Using a cryptographic method to make those 4 bits represent some larger set of data is complete irrelevant and outside of Shannon&#8217;s Law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: broadstuff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[broadstuff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Does Twitter break Shannon&#039;s Law?...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thought sparked by a post from Kathy Sierra&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To recap, Shannon&#039;s law states that in a communication channel of limited capacity, useful information is transmitted at:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;C = W log2(1 + S /N ),&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;where C is the channel capacity in bits per second, ...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Does Twitter break Shannon&#8217;s Law?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thought sparked by a post from Kathy Sierra</p>
<p>To recap, Shannon&#8217;s law states that in a communication channel of limited capacity, useful information is transmitted at:</p>
<p>C = W log2(1 + S /N ),</p>
<p>where C is the channel capacity in bits per second, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Jacobson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It is bizarre how quickly it moved from hot app of the moment to passe, at least in local circles at any rate.  It makes me wonder whether people who are not early adopters will hear about apps that rise and fall so quickly.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is bizarre how quickly it moved from hot app of the moment to passe, at least in local circles at any rate.  It makes me wonder whether people who are not early adopters will hear about apps that rise and fall so quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon Billian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Billian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think that the tool has potential to be more useful if some changes are made to the product. As it stands now, at least from a professional standpoint &amp; gathering information, I currently find it somewhat lacking &amp; doesn&#039;t give users enough control over what they receive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do think that this is a service that can take off with teens, college students &amp; overseas markets.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the tool has potential to be more useful if some changes are made to the product. As it stands now, at least from a professional standpoint &amp; gathering information, I currently find it somewhat lacking &amp; doesn&#8217;t give users enough control over what they receive.</p>
<p>I do think that this is a service that can take off with teens, college students &amp; overseas markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narendra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Narendra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do think that one of the driving forces in twitter&#039;s uptick (outside of the buzz) is that they have made a range of inputs and outputs (such as web and IM) to allow people to participate in the stream.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Third parties are jumping in as well with products like twitterific.  And for those people who want mobile but not SMS, 30 Boxes has put out &lt;a href=&quot;http://30boxes.com/blog/index.php/2007/03/11/introducing-twapper/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;twapper &lt;/a&gt; to allow wap browsing.  We also be integrating our buddy updates (your online life stream) into twapper as well.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,</p>
<p>I do think that one of the driving forces in twitter&#8217;s uptick (outside of the buzz) is that they have made a range of inputs and outputs (such as web and IM) to allow people to participate in the stream.</p>
<p>Third parties are jumping in as well with products like twitterific.  And for those people who want mobile but not SMS, 30 Boxes has put out <a href="http://30boxes.com/blog/index.php/2007/03/11/introducing-twapper/" rel="nofollow">twapper </a> to allow wap browsing.  We also be integrating our buddy updates (your online life stream) into twapper as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/twitter/#comment-138018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree, though they have gotten better over last few weeks. i think the SxSW killed them with overload.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, though they have gotten better over last few weeks. i think the SxSW killed them with overload.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
