<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Cisco paid $3.2B for WebEx?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco vs. All Comers &#187;Coolweather</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco vs. All Comers &#187;Coolweather]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] into blade servers, consumer products, video servers and services (such as via its acquisitions of Webex and ScanSafe, respectively) &#8212; made perfect sense. What&#8217;s been surprising, however, is [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into blade servers, consumer products, video servers and services (such as via its acquisitions of Webex and ScanSafe, respectively) &#8212; made perfect sense. What&#8217;s been surprising, however, is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco vs. All Comers &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco vs. All Comers &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] into blade servers, consumer products, video servers and services (such as via its acquisitions of Webex and ScanSafe, respectively) &#8212; made perfect sense. What&#8217;s been surprising, however, is [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into blade servers, consumer products, video servers and services (such as via its acquisitions of Webex and ScanSafe, respectively) &#8212; made perfect sense. What&#8217;s been surprising, however, is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brindey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brindey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I host windows and do not have a problem running &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.proxynetworks.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PC Remote Access&lt;/a&gt;, as well as many other windows of firefox, itunes, Word, and Excel- all at the same time. That said, I think the issue is that many people do have a problem- and each of their customer&#039;s should be satisfied. I think you are right, SaidAndDone, Linux is more open to new and changing features which gives it better versatility for users.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I host windows and do not have a problem running <a href="http://www.proxynetworks.com" rel="nofollow">PC Remote Access</a>, as well as many other windows of firefox, itunes, Word, and Excel- all at the same time. That said, I think the issue is that many people do have a problem- and each of their customer&#8217;s should be satisfied. I think you are right, SaidAndDone, Linux is more open to new and changing features which gives it better versatility for users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Web Conferencing with 16 online Tools &#124; Ask Chief Online</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Free Web Conferencing with 16 online Tools &#124; Ask Chief Online]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the great grandma of online meeting providers acquired by Cisco for $3.2 billion. WebEx MeetMeNow gives you all the tools you need to host engaging meetings with up to 10 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the great grandma of online meeting providers acquired by Cisco for $3.2 billion. WebEx MeetMeNow gives you all the tools you need to host engaging meetings with up to 10 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Microsoft in Sight, Cisco Buys Jabber - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With Microsoft in Sight, Cisco Buys Jabber - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it follows nicely with Cisco&#8217;s buy of PostPath earlier this month, as well as its WebEx acquisition. Cisco CEO John Chambers has been pretty vocal in its desire to go after three hot markets - [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it follows nicely with Cisco&#8217;s buy of PostPath earlier this month, as well as its WebEx acquisition. Cisco CEO John Chambers has been pretty vocal in its desire to go after three hot markets &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco Betting Big on Buzzwords for Growth - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco Betting Big on Buzzwords for Growth - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have written extensively about Cisco&#8217;s various moves into collaboration, in particular its pesky fight with Google and Microsoft, as well as its commitment to data [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have written extensively about Cisco&#8217;s various moves into collaboration, in particular its pesky fight with Google and Microsoft, as well as its commitment to data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco se apunta al Software como negocio &#124; El Blog de Javier Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco se apunta al Software como negocio &#124; El Blog de Javier Rodriguez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] aplicaciones colaborativas empresariales, para el que ha realizado algunas acquisiciones: compró  WebEx en el mercado de las conferencias Web , cazó Tribe.net para mostrarse más cerca del &#8220;social [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aplicaciones colaborativas empresariales, para el que ha realizado algunas acquisiciones: compró  WebEx en el mercado de las conferencias Web , cazó Tribe.net para mostrarse más cerca del &#8220;social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Collaboration Pit Cisco Against Microsoft, Google? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Collaboration Pit Cisco Against Microsoft, Google? - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] either the software or the web DNA of its fellow tech behemoths. It has made some hesitant steps. It bought WebEx to move deeper into web conferencing, nabbed Tribe.net in order to get a closer look at social [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] either the software or the web DNA of its fellow tech behemoths. It has made some hesitant steps. It bought WebEx to move deeper into web conferencing, nabbed Tribe.net in order to get a closer look at social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Checks blog - Life Master</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Checks blog - Life Master]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why Cisco paid $3.2B for WebEx? « GigaOM I think Om is right that the service makes a natural pawn (or maybe a rook) in the chess game with Microsoft for supremacy in the in-between world of Web [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Cisco paid $3.2B for WebEx? « GigaOM I think Om is right that the service makes a natural pawn (or maybe a rook) in the chess game with Microsoft for supremacy in the in-between world of Web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Complete List of 2007 Web / Technology Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Complete List of 2007 Web / Technology Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is a leader in the online web conferencing space. Press Release &#124; TechCrunch &#124; GigaOm  &#124; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a leader in the online web conferencing space. Press Release | TechCrunch | GigaOm  | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Conferencing Roundup: 9 Tools for Online Meetings &#171; Web Worker Daily</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Conferencing Roundup: 9 Tools for Online Meetings &#171; Web Worker Daily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the great grandma of online meeting providers acquired by Cisco for $3.2 billion, now has to fight back against upstart competitors providing web meetings at a flat monthly rate. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the great grandma of online meeting providers acquired by Cisco for $3.2 billion, now has to fight back against upstart competitors providing web meetings at a flat monthly rate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimdim Challenges WebEx, Microsoft &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimdim Challenges WebEx, Microsoft &#171; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] that doesn&#8217;t mean WebEx (acquired by Cisco Systems for $3.2 billion) has anything to worry about right now, for Dimdim is still a work in progress. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that doesn&#8217;t mean WebEx (acquired by Cisco Systems for $3.2 billion) has anything to worry about right now, for Dimdim is still a work in progress. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrugesh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrugesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Interview with Rajeev Purnaiya : Founder of Hooeey
Rajeev Purnaiya was born and brought up in Bangalore. he sold for an estimated $4 million to WebEx (WebEx subsequently was acquired by Cisco for $3.2 billion).
Founding CyberBazaar was one of the best feelings for him and his next big thing is Hooeey. Let&#039;s find out more...
http://www.loscreador.com/2007/06/21/interview-with-rajeev-purnaiya-founder-of-hooeey/&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interview with Rajeev Purnaiya : Founder of Hooeey<br />
Rajeev Purnaiya was born and brought up in Bangalore. he sold for an estimated $4 million to WebEx (WebEx subsequently was acquired by Cisco for $3.2 billion).<br />
Founding CyberBazaar was one of the best feelings for him and his next big thing is Hooeey. Let&#8217;s find out more&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.loscreador.com/2007/06/21/interview-with-rajeev-purnaiya-founder-of-hooeey/" rel="nofollow">http://www.loscreador.com/2007/06/21/interview-with-rajeev-purnaiya-founder-of-hooeey/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK Singh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JK Singh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 07:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I landed on this, very cool and interesting project for desktop sharing. WebEx seems over rated looking at some thing free and open.
Just quoting from the site directly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What is ShowMyPC.com?
                    This is an open source Remote PC access project, an alternative to subscription
                    based sites like WebEx or Gotomypc.
                    ShowMyPC uses SSH port forwarding mechanism using Open Source SSH client plink
                    and VNC Remote access software. Users can use there own middle SSH server.
                    No registration, no logins, all open and free. Read More.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I landed on this, very cool and interesting project for desktop sharing. WebEx seems over rated looking at some thing free and open.<br />
Just quoting from the site directly.</p>
<p>What is ShowMyPC.com?<br />
                    This is an open source Remote PC access project, an alternative to subscription<br />
                    based sites like WebEx or Gotomypc.<br />
                    ShowMyPC uses SSH port forwarding mechanism using Open Source SSH client plink<br />
                    and VNC Remote access software. Users can use there own middle SSH server.<br />
                    No registration, no logins, all open and free. Read More.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Cisco&#8217;s Chambers is Born again Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; Cisco&#8217;s Chambers is Born again Web 2.0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 05:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] justification for the $3.2 billion purchase of WebEx. However, it was on the conference call, Chambers really chanted the Web 2.0 [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] justification for the $3.2 billion purchase of WebEx. However, it was on the conference call, Chambers really chanted the Web 2.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quasi.dot &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Copyright, internet &#38; IP follies</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quasi.dot &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Copyright, internet &#38; IP follies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/why-cisco-bought-webex-for-32-billion/#comment-137934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] numero 4: Cisco che compra società curiosamente lontane dal suo core [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] numero 4: Cisco che compra società curiosamente lontane dal suo core [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

