<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 700 MHz Explained in 10 Steps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-976177</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-976177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;are there any health/safety implications from this change?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are there any health/safety implications from this change?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Mobile Considering Licensing 4G Network, Expect Higher Prices &#124; Techgeist</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-974368</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Mobile Considering Licensing 4G Network, Expect Higher Prices &#124; Techgeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-974368</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] bidder gets it. Clearwire&#8217;s business model is to license its right to certain parts of the 700 Mhz spectrum to other companies, allowing Clearwire and others in the business to keep the prices high. Thus it [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bidder gets it. Clearwire&#8217;s business model is to license its right to certain parts of the 700 Mhz spectrum to other companies, allowing Clearwire and others in the business to keep the prices high. Thus it [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarki indir</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-972366</link>
		<dc:creator>sarki indir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-972366</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In cities, already well-covered by existing cellular infrastructure, it is less reasonable to designate this band for cellular. However, it is useful as it penetrates further into buildings than higher frequencies. I believe that text-messaging services, and other low-bandwidth applications which require high reliability, are the best use of this band. Perhaps part of the 700 mhz could be used for control signals in cellular applications, to help the phone find a working channel in which to send its data (voice content and other high-bandwidth applications such as video).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In cities, already well-covered by existing cellular infrastructure, it is less reasonable to designate this band for cellular. However, it is useful as it penetrates further into buildings than higher frequencies. I believe that text-messaging services, and other low-bandwidth applications which require high reliability, are the best use of this band. Perhaps part of the 700 mhz could be used for control signals in cellular applications, to help the phone find a working channel in which to send its data (voice content and other high-bandwidth applications such as video).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Macke</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-970150</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Macke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-970150</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;1.9 and 2.4 have higher data throughput capabilites&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.9 and 2.4 have higher data throughput capabilites</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The next great Technology Supernova is coming &#124; Silvexis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-957404</link>
		<dc:creator>The next great Technology Supernova is coming &#124; Silvexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-957404</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] up as demand for their hardware starts to return to late 90&#8217;s levels. Lets not forget the 700Mhz UHF spectrum that just got opened up with the end of analog TV broadcasts as well. I think how this [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up as demand for their hardware starts to return to late 90&#8217;s levels. Lets not forget the 700Mhz UHF spectrum that just got opened up with the end of analog TV broadcasts as well. I think how this [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: At Long Last, the DTV Transition Is Upon Us</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-952285</link>
		<dc:creator>At Long Last, the DTV Transition Is Upon Us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-952285</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...]    After a fourth-month delay, the DTV transition, which will enable several services to run on the  700 MHz spectrum that had long been used for analog TV, will kick off tomorrow. For the string of companies affected by the delay, it will be a sweet way [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    After a fourth-month delay, the DTV transition, which will enable several services to run on the  700 MHz spectrum that had long been used for analog TV, will kick off tomorrow. For the string of companies affected by the delay, it will be a sweet way [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Towerstream Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Georgians Bridge the Broadband Gap</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-941534</link>
		<dc:creator>Towerstream Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Georgians Bridge the Broadband Gap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-941534</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] over the years, obtaining several million dollars in government grants and spectrum, including the 700 MHz license for its [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over the years, obtaining several million dollars in government grants and spectrum, including the 700 MHz license for its [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slow Wired Broadband Could Choke LTE Femtocells</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-937861</link>
		<dc:creator>Slow Wired Broadband Could Choke LTE Femtocells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-937861</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] both of which have spectrum in the 700 MHz band &#8212; will even need 4G femtocells, given how well that spectrum penetrates buildings. On the speed side, even though ISPs are deploying fiber or wideband cable through DOCSIS 3.0, both [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] both of which have spectrum in the 700 MHz band &#8212; will even need 4G femtocells, given how well that spectrum penetrates buildings. On the speed side, even though ISPs are deploying fiber or wideband cable through DOCSIS 3.0, both [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigategyVerizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless]</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-936154</link>
		<dc:creator>GigategyVerizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 02:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-936154</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless] &#124; syntech software tech blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-935501</link>
		<dc:creator>Verizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless] &#124; syntech software tech blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-935501</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless] &#124; Ink and Virtue</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-935500</link>
		<dc:creator>Verizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless] &#124; Ink and Virtue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-935500</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Пресата presata.com&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless]</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-935479</link>
		<dc:creator>Пресата presata.com&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-935479</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triad 700, not Verizon Wireless getting Block &#8216;C&#8217; licenses &#124; Spectrum of Greed</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-921389</link>
		<dc:creator>Triad 700, not Verizon Wireless getting Block &#8216;C&#8217; licenses &#124; Spectrum of Greed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-921389</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the FCC placed on the spectrum if the bid exceeded 4.6 Billion will be achieved.  Om Malik has a great explanation of the spectrum here.  Those requirements were that they had to allow all devices and all applications.   Share and [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the FCC placed on the spectrum if the bid exceeded 4.6 Billion will be achieved.  Om Malik has a great explanation of the spectrum here.  Those requirements were that they had to allow all devices and all applications.   Share and [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I am shocked, SHOCKED to learn &#8230; &#171; the Chief Seattle Geek blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-917813</link>
		<dc:creator>I am shocked, SHOCKED to learn &#8230; &#171; the Chief Seattle Geek blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-917813</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 1: Congress authorized the removal of UHF television channels 52 through 69, freeing 108 megahertz of spectrum in the 700 megahertz [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1: Congress authorized the removal of UHF television channels 52 through 69, freeing 108 megahertz of spectrum in the 700 megahertz [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Browsers &#38; the Web, part 4: Ubiquitous Access &#171; EWS New Media Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-901617</link>
		<dc:creator>Browsers &#38; the Web, part 4: Ubiquitous Access &#171; EWS New Media Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-901617</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 700 MHz band (also know as the UHF band). This band is extremely valuable because according to some estimates it would possibly allow for network towers with a range twice that of current cell phone towers [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 700 MHz band (also know as the UHF band). This band is extremely valuable because according to some estimates it would possibly allow for network towers with a range twice that of current cell phone towers [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMTOWTDI &#187; Browsers &#38; the Web, part 3: Ubiquitous Access</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-901616</link>
		<dc:creator>TMTOWTDI &#187; Browsers &#38; the Web, part 3: Ubiquitous Access</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-901616</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 700 MHz band (also know as the UHF band). This band is extremely valuable because according to some estimates it would possibly allow for network towers with a range twice that of current cell phone towers [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 700 MHz band (also know as the UHF band). This band is extremely valuable because according to some estimates it would possibly allow for network towers with a range twice that of current cell phone towers [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
