<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 700 MHz Explained in 10 Steps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:27:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will We Soon Have Gigantic Wireless&#160;Hotspots?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-267522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will We Soon Have Gigantic Wireless&#160;Hotspots?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-267522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] situation arose a few years ago as part of the transition to digital television in the U.S.:  certain frequencies were freed up for non-television use. Indeed, the 700 MHz spectrum auction netted nearly $20 billion as Verizon, AT&amp;T and others [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] situation arose a few years ago as part of the transition to digital television in the U.S.:  certain frequencies were freed up for non-television use. Indeed, the 700 MHz spectrum auction netted nearly $20 billion as Verizon, AT&amp;T and others [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spectrum Re-Allocation Explained &#171; From Inside the Shark Tank</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spectrum Re-Allocation Explained &#171; From Inside the Shark Tank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] was broadcast using the lower end of the 700MHz spectrum (598-806 MHz). With the shut-off, the government reclaimed 60 MHz of the ultra-high frequency spectrum and announced their plans to auction off the [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was broadcast using the lower end of the 700MHz spectrum (598-806 MHz). With the shut-off, the government reclaimed 60 MHz of the ultra-high frequency spectrum and announced their plans to auction off the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Verizon says 4-G service on track for rollout around Boston :: Granite Geek :: NashuaTelegraph.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Verizon says 4-G service on track for rollout around Boston :: Granite Geek :: NashuaTelegraph.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] uses the 700 MHz spectrum left over from the analog TV spectrum. Peak speeds have been reported at 60 Mbps (says Gizmodo). CNet adds the kicker: The next bit of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] uses the 700 MHz spectrum left over from the analog TV spectrum. Peak speeds have been reported at 60 Mbps (says Gizmodo). CNet adds the kicker: The next bit of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quikstarts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to prepare for Digital TV in 2009</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quikstarts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to prepare for Digital TV in 2009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] happened to the analog signal / Airwaves ? = This signal travels over a slice of air known as the 700Mhz spectrum. Starting on 1/24/2008 and as of the time of this post, this slice of air is being auctioned [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] happened to the analog signal / Airwaves ? = This signal travels over a slice of air known as the 700Mhz spectrum. Starting on 1/24/2008 and as of the time of this post, this slice of air is being auctioned [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forrest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I believe the key in this delima is how we modulate the signals in these particular bands. The modification of MIMO antennas and modification 802.xx protocols using better OPSK modulations will intertwine themselves into the 700mhz ring of play.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the key in this delima is how we modulate the signals in these particular bands. The modification of MIMO antennas and modification 802.xx protocols using better OPSK modulations will intertwine themselves into the 700mhz ring of play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[are there any health/safety implications from this change?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are there any health/safety implications from this change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Mobile Considering Licensing 4G Network, Expect Higher Prices &#124; Techgeist</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T-Mobile Considering Licensing 4G Network, Expect Higher Prices &#124; Techgeist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] bidder gets it. Clearwire&#8217;s business model is to license its right to certain parts of the 700 Mhz spectrum to other companies, allowing Clearwire and others in the business to keep the prices high. Thus it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bidder gets it. Clearwire&#8217;s business model is to license its right to certain parts of the 700 Mhz spectrum to other companies, allowing Clearwire and others in the business to keep the prices high. Thus it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarki indir</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sarki indir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In cities, already well-covered by existing cellular infrastructure, it is less reasonable to designate this band for cellular. However, it is useful as it penetrates further into buildings than higher frequencies. I believe that text-messaging services, and other low-bandwidth applications which require high reliability, are the best use of this band. Perhaps part of the 700 mhz could be used for control signals in cellular applications, to help the phone find a working channel in which to send its data (voice content and other high-bandwidth applications such as video).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In cities, already well-covered by existing cellular infrastructure, it is less reasonable to designate this band for cellular. However, it is useful as it penetrates further into buildings than higher frequencies. I believe that text-messaging services, and other low-bandwidth applications which require high reliability, are the best use of this band. Perhaps part of the 700 mhz could be used for control signals in cellular applications, to help the phone find a working channel in which to send its data (voice content and other high-bandwidth applications such as video).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Macke</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Macke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1.9 and 2.4 have higher data throughput capabilites]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.9 and 2.4 have higher data throughput capabilites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The next great Technology Supernova is coming &#124; Silvexis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The next great Technology Supernova is coming &#124; Silvexis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up as demand for their hardware starts to return to late 90&#8217;s levels. Lets not forget the 700Mhz UHF spectrum that just got opened up with the end of analog TV broadcasts as well. I think how this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up as demand for their hardware starts to return to late 90&#8217;s levels. Lets not forget the 700Mhz UHF spectrum that just got opened up with the end of analog TV broadcasts as well. I think how this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: At Long Last, the DTV Transition Is Upon Us</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[At Long Last, the DTV Transition Is Upon Us]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]    After a fourth-month delay, the DTV transition, which will enable several services to run on the  700 MHz spectrum that had long been used for analog TV, will kick off tomorrow. For the string of companies affected by the delay, it will be a sweet way [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    After a fourth-month delay, the DTV transition, which will enable several services to run on the  700 MHz spectrum that had long been used for analog TV, will kick off tomorrow. For the string of companies affected by the delay, it will be a sweet way [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Towerstream Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Georgians Bridge the Broadband Gap</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Towerstream Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Georgians Bridge the Broadband Gap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] over the years, obtaining several million dollars in government grants and spectrum, including the 700 MHz license for its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over the years, obtaining several million dollars in government grants and spectrum, including the 700 MHz license for its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slow Wired Broadband Could Choke LTE Femtocells</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slow Wired Broadband Could Choke LTE Femtocells]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] both of which have spectrum in the 700 MHz band &#8212; will even need 4G femtocells, given how well that spectrum penetrates buildings. On the speed side, even though ISPs are deploying fiber or wideband cable through DOCSIS 3.0, both [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] both of which have spectrum in the 700 MHz band &#8212; will even need 4G femtocells, given how well that spectrum penetrates buildings. On the speed side, even though ISPs are deploying fiber or wideband cable through DOCSIS 3.0, both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigategyVerizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless]</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigategyVerizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless]]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 02:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless] &#124; syntech software tech blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless] &#124; syntech software tech blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless] &#124; Ink and Virtue</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verizon Promises More Coverage with 4G Than It Now Provides With 3G [4G Wireless] &#124; Ink and Virtue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/#comment-137773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as some wise nerd commenter from one of Om&#8217;s 700MHz stories pointed out a couple years back, the tradeoff with lower frequency is that because it travels so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

