<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Space, the new Wireless Frontier?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: We&#8217;re Gonna Have to Wait a Year for White Spaces - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-910793</link>
		<dc:creator>We&#8217;re Gonna Have to Wait a Year for White Spaces - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-910793</guid>
		<description>[...] a lot of hard work lies ahead. We&#8217;re not talking about the U.S. presidential race, but the even longer slog to use the spectrum between digital television channels for unlicensed wireless [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a lot of hard work lies ahead. We&#8217;re not talking about the U.S. presidential race, but the even longer slog to use the spectrum between digital television channels for unlicensed wireless [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Pushes White Space, Says Free The AirWaves - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-894611</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Pushes White Space, Says Free The AirWaves - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-894611</guid>
		<description>[...] campaign, Free The Airwaves, an effort by the company to get some traction around white spaces, the tiny slivers of spectrum that resides in the 700 MHz band vacated by analog television&#8217;s switch to digital transmissions. It even [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] campaign, Free The Airwaves, an effort by the company to get some traction around white spaces, the tiny slivers of spectrum that resides in the 700 MHz band vacated by analog television&#8217;s switch to digital transmissions. It even [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Pushes White Space, Says FreeTheAirWaves - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-894601</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Pushes White Space, Says FreeTheAirWaves - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-894601</guid>
		<description>[...] campaign, Free The Airwave, an effort by the company to get some traction around white spaces, the tiny slivers of spectrum that resides in the 700 MHz band vacated by analog television&#8217;s switch to digital transmissions. It even [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] campaign, Free The Airwave, an effort by the company to get some traction around white spaces, the tiny slivers of spectrum that resides in the 700 MHz band vacated by analog television&#8217;s switch to digital transmissions. It even [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-803207</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 07:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-803207</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jacomo- just to answer your 1st question about microsoft. If the deal falls through and is successful... everyone&#60;--(this needs to be bolded, underlined, and all caps) is going to want their part in it. So even if they're not very relevant- they're going to want to keep their feet in the door.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacomo- just to answer your 1st question about microsoft. If the deal falls through and is successful&#8230; everyone&lt;&#8211;(this needs to be bolded, underlined, and all caps) is going to want their part in it. So even if they&#8217;re not very relevant- they&#8217;re going to want to keep their feet in the door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacomo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-92650</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-92650</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Comments and Questions:
1. Why is Microsoft involved with development of a Wireless Radio frequency shifting device or software when their are products out there today in development by Radio vendors? See Airspan.
2. White Space normally addresses the 400Mhz and lower spectrum and TV Broadcast Channels and not the 700Mhz spectrum. The group may be asking the FCC to test using the 700Mhz spectrum which is free in some markets today.
3. The 700Mhz spectrum is already set to be auctioned off on Feb 2008 for activation in 2009. What this effort (freeing up the WHite Space to unlicensed use) might undermine is the effort by many Service Providers to be allowed to bid on 700 Mhz spectrum in their immediate geographic areas instead of having to compete with the big CellCO and RBOC in a regional (SE) type auction.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am afraid the CellCo, RBOC and major MSO will fight all these efforts (creating an Unlicensed 700Mhz and under 400Mhz service)tooth in nail because they are so heavily invested in Licensed spectrum that costs them Billions. Unless the new COngress forces it the FCC will cave to these big boys and the public will not have access to real competition. The CellCo and their new (3G Plus)Narrowband Data offerings will really suffer if these spectrums are opened up to Unlicensed use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jacomo&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments and Questions:<br />
1. Why is Microsoft involved with development of a Wireless Radio frequency shifting device or software when their are products out there today in development by Radio vendors? See Airspan.<br />
2. White Space normally addresses the 400Mhz and lower spectrum and TV Broadcast Channels and not the 700Mhz spectrum. The group may be asking the FCC to test using the 700Mhz spectrum which is free in some markets today.<br />
3. The 700Mhz spectrum is already set to be auctioned off on Feb 2008 for activation in 2009. What this effort (freeing up the WHite Space to unlicensed use) might undermine is the effort by many Service Providers to be allowed to bid on 700 Mhz spectrum in their immediate geographic areas instead of having to compete with the big CellCO and RBOC in a regional (SE) type auction.</p>
<p>I am afraid the CellCo, RBOC and major MSO will fight all these efforts (creating an Unlicensed 700Mhz and under 400Mhz service)tooth in nail because they are so heavily invested in Licensed spectrum that costs them Billions. Unless the new COngress forces it the FCC will cave to these big boys and the public will not have access to real competition. The CellCo and their new (3G Plus)Narrowband Data offerings will really suffer if these spectrums are opened up to Unlicensed use.</p>
<p>Jacomo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-92646</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-92646</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I figured there would be a conspiracy nut's angle in this, and there it is in the first comment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile back on the planet Earth, it's not clear from news reports whether this system is a low-power, in-home network extender for UWB and WiFi or a high-power, outdoor alternative to WiMax. Until we know that, it's pointless to speculate about its significance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured there would be a conspiracy nut&#8217;s angle in this, and there it is in the first comment.</p>
<p>Meanwhile back on the planet Earth, it&#8217;s not clear from news reports whether this system is a low-power, in-home network extender for UWB and WiFi or a high-power, outdoor alternative to WiMax. Until we know that, it&#8217;s pointless to speculate about its significance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laddie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-92644</link>
		<dc:creator>laddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/#comment-92644</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;With all the vigilant and concerted attacks on net neutrality and municipal wifi that the cable companies and telcos have orchestrated, will they sit idly by?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the vigilant and concerted attacks on net neutrality and municipal wifi that the cable companies and telcos have orchestrated, will they sit idly by?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
