<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google Changing Its Position on Net Neutrality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:15:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoodBye Network Neutrality, Welcome Open Internet! &#124; BroadbandBreakfast.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoodBye Network Neutrality, Welcome Open Internet! &#124; BroadbandBreakfast.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] what Google meant by the term. He was also reacting to some statements by top Google executives suggesting a softening of the company’s hard-line views on the subject. Whitt noted “that lack of broadband [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what Google meant by the term. He was also reacting to some statements by top Google executives suggesting a softening of the company’s hard-line views on the subject. Whitt noted “that lack of broadband [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Makes a U-Turn on Net Neutrality &#124; Political Now</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Makes a U-Turn on Net Neutrality &#124; Political Now]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] frequency, news outlets are strating to report that Google is a doing a head fake. GigOm first reported on this back in May of 2007.  This morning, the infamous disgraced securities analyst turned blogger Henry [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] frequency, news outlets are strating to report that Google is a doing a head fake. GigOm first reported on this back in May of 2007.  This morning, the infamous disgraced securities analyst turned blogger Henry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net Neutrality Important! Time Warner Cable considering per-gigabyte plans - theBubbler</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Net Neutrality Important! Time Warner Cable considering per-gigabyte plans - theBubbler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on behalf of investors (which is their &quot;responsibility&quot;) could always change their tune.  Is Google Changing Its Position on Net Neutrality? - GigaOM  Here&#039;s a neat, fairly recent post about a tool to find out if ISPs are trying to throttle your [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on behalf of investors (which is their &quot;responsibility&quot;) could always change their tune.  Is Google Changing Its Position on Net Neutrality? &#8211; GigaOM  Here&#8217;s a neat, fairly recent post about a tool to find out if ISPs are trying to throttle your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Blogs: The New Editorial Page?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corporate Blogs: The New Editorial Page?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 04:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] neutrality.McLaughlin stoked controversy among bloggers (including this one) when in February he publicly suggested that it would be OK for broadband providers to charge other companies for quality-of-service [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] neutrality.McLaughlin stoked controversy among bloggers (including this one) when in February he publicly suggested that it would be OK for broadband providers to charge other companies for quality-of-service [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: +None &#187; Neutralidad o influjo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[+None &#187; Neutralidad o influjo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] es un ángel: Google no es neutral en China (incluso se duda de su postura) y AOL cobra bastante, por no decir demasiado, a cada hijo de vecino por un servicio mediocre que [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] es un ángel: Google no es neutral en China (incluso se duda de su postura) y AOL cobra bastante, por no decir demasiado, a cada hijo de vecino por un servicio mediocre que [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Google: Backpedaling away from Net neutrality stance? &#124; Between the Lines &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Google: Backpedaling away from Net neutrality stance? &#124; Between the Lines &#124; ZDNet.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Drew Clark makes a convincing case that Google is backing off of its stance as Net neutrality [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drew Clark makes a convincing case that Google is backing off of its stance as Net neutrality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; News to know: Microsoft&#8217;s new UI; Copyright crossroads; Apple megapatch &#124; Between the Lines &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; News to know: Microsoft&#8217;s new UI; Copyright crossroads; Apple megapatch &#124; Between the Lines &#124; ZDNet.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] GigaOm: Is Google Changing Its Position on Net Neutrality? [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOm: Is Google Changing Its Position on Net Neutrality? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Foremski</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Foremski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 03:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;GOOG can easily go both ways on this one. It has said that it could afford to pay for the bandwidth but it has chosen to side for net neutrality. However, it can change its mind, nothing is for ever...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOG can easily go both ways on this one. It has said that it could afford to pay for the bandwidth but it has chosen to side for net neutrality. However, it can change its mind, nothing is for ever&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Navel of the Internet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Honourable members consider net neutrality</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Navel of the Internet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Honourable members consider net neutrality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] wasn&#8217;t neutral enough. That&#8217;s sad, but probably indicative of the on-line giant&#8217;s change of heart on the subject of a smarter [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wasn&#8217;t neutral enough. That&#8217;s sad, but probably indicative of the on-line giant&#8217;s change of heart on the subject of a smarter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peace</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/is-google-changing-its-position-on-net-neutrality/#comment-137655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&quot;Conspiratorialists&quot; why do you have to use that word. They are just normal concerned people. Quit separating people with that term, just call them people. Okay?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Conspiratorialists&#8221; why do you have to use that word. They are just normal concerned people. Quit separating people with that term, just call them people. Okay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
