26 Comments

Summary:

After almost every screencast that I post here on The Apple Blog, someone asks about the software that I’m using. (Also about the wallpaper on my desktop…) Without hesitation I reply, Snapz Pro X. It’s screen capturing software on steroids, and makes the process of recording […]

snapz pro xAfter almost every screencast that I post here on The Apple Blog, someone asks about the software that I’m using. (Also about the wallpaper on my desktop…) Without hesitation I reply, Snapz Pro X. It’s screen capturing software on steroids, and makes the process of recording your screen movements absolutely a breeze.

Though I’ll give a word of caution on Snapz Pro X: It’s not yet Universal, but Intel Compatible, as Ambrosia Software puts it. This means it runs under Rosetta without consistently dying a horrible death. If there’s one app I’ve been anxiously awaiting a Universal binary for, it is this one. At $69, it’s a rather hefty price tag. So if you’re considering purchasing this app, I may recommend holding off until the Intel Native version comes along, so you don’t feel any buyer’s remorse in the interim.

iShowUHowever, in the past year, other options have become available. You can also give iShowU a try. I used it briefly while awaiting Ambrosia’s Intel Compatibility. While I felt spoiled by Snapz Pro X, iShowU was definitely a nice little app for motion screen captures. It’s been some time since I last used iShowU, so I briefly gave it another try while writing this post. It has several quality presets that make it extremely simple to use, and then processes the movie file blazingly fast for viewing (not a strong point in the Intel Compatible Snapz Pro X’s column). At only $20 this is definitely a worthwile piece of software to try out.

CopernicusAnd recently I heard about Copernicus. Unlike the 2 software options I’ve already mentioned, Copernicus is freeware. It looks like it’s got some potential, but will still need some spit and polish to give the others a run for their money – but then of course, it doesn’t actually cost any money, so the developer has nothing to lose at this point. Copernicus does something a bit different, and gives the user the option to record the movie into RAM, which supposedly gives a shorter processing time. Interesting idea, but on my 2Ghz/2GB MacBook, it seemed to hang and give me more trouble than it was worth. Perhaps I had too many other things running at the time. But it is free software, so it’s worth a try if you’re on a budget and would like to grace the world with your own screencasts.

  1. A Mac developer taking longer than Adobe…amazing.
    With service like that, I guess I’ll look at the others.

    Share
  2. Personally, I have been using Display Eater, and like it.

    http://reversecode.com/

    Share
  3. FWIW, I’ve had no problem whatsoever using Snapz Pro on my MacPro.

    Share
  4. I tried iShowU, and it filled up my RAM so fast when recording that after a short amount of time the machine would become unuseable.

    I even tried some others, but Snaps Pro X is the only one with good performance on my MacBook Pro.

    In regards to development time, they did get an Intel compatible version out fairly quickly. They’ve said the universal version is going to be a complete rewrite, and I’m willing to wait for that. The only advantage to the universal version would be improving the export processing time.

    Share
  5. I’m with Jim. I use Snapz Pro on my Macbook Pro and have had no problems. It runs like a dream.

    Share
  6. Hello, I am the author of Copernicus. I was delighted to see my software mentioned on this blog, and I think you gave it a fair appraisal. I know it’s not the best software in the world, but it’s enough for some people.

    I tried Display Eater a few days ago, and was surprised at just how fluid the captures were. If you’re looking for quality on a budget, I strongly recommend it. Of course, Snapz Pro X is the best tool around if you can put up the cash.

    Share
  7. Snapz Pro is a disappointing joke as far as I’m concerned. When was the app given any real functional updates? The endless delay in a Universal version is ludicrous, as is the annoying nag alert I get every time I boot my machine. “Upgrade to Snapz Pro X 2 now! We might even update it someday!” Um, no thanks.

    I envy the Windows world for very little, but screen capture software is woefully inadequate on the Mac compared to the Windows world. Both Camtasia (for motion capture) and SnagIt (for stills) kick sand in Snapz’ face and laugh about it. The Snapz Pro interface is convoluted and functionality is bare bones. Is this really the best the Mac development world can do??? Pitiful.

    Frankly I’m hoping TechSmith will do a Mac version of SnagIt. In fact, there’s an online petition (please sign):

    http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=493032743512

    Yeah, SnagIt is for static screen captures only, sorry for the OT diversion…

    Share
  8. iShowU is awesome. The Apple Animation preset (with ‘good’ quality setting) is basically a raw capture off of your computer. Lock-ups and/or other havok are undoubtedly user error. After you’ve captured your movie, just export it to whatever format. No choppiness, no problem with full-screen capture (for me at least, Macbook Pro 17″ 2.16 ghz 2GB RAM)

    Intel native, it screams. Easy to use. Lots of mouse-over features. I’ve used it to make three tutorials so far, with great feedback.

    Share
  9. Does anyone know of an application which will give the same level of functionality as Macromedia/Adobe Captivate for the Mac?

    Share
  10. [...] Screencast Software Options (tags: screencast blog software apps) Leave a Reply [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post