Comments on: Moore’s Law 2.0 http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/ Tracking the Internet Evolution Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:28:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 By: Computer Speed Test http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-872042 Computer Speed Test Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:06:03 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-872042 <p>The title certainly got people's attention!</p> <p>I'm looking forward to the way things are going. I love when different technologies are combined together to make wonderful devices. The only thing I'm not fancy about is when devices are created and given restrictions on who you can use it with (ie certain cell phones for certain carriers).</p> <p>If I spent hundreds or thousands of dollars on an all in one device, I don't want to be bound to a particular cell phone company.</p> <p>I also love company's who open source their devices or at a least allow it's users to develope extensions/software for the devices.</p> <p>Take care, Paul</p> The title certainly got people’s attention!

I’m looking forward to the way things are going. I love when different technologies are combined together to make wonderful devices. The only thing I’m not fancy about is when devices are created and given restrictions on who you can use it with (ie certain cell phones for certain carriers).

If I spent hundreds or thousands of dollars on an all in one device, I don’t want to be bound to a particular cell phone company.

I also love company’s who open source their devices or at a least allow it’s users to develope extensions/software for the devices.

Take care,
Paul

]]> By: Sheena http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-326812 Sheena Mon, 09 Jul 2007 06:00:46 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-326812 <p>Moore's Law is currently applicabble in today's techlogy. The more transistors there is in the chip, the better it functions. We clearly see that now in the products different computer companies offer in the mearket. Computer integration in lives have been remarkebly fascinating. Thanks for Mr. G. Moore's observation.</p> Moore’s Law is currently applicabble in today’s techlogy. The more transistors there is in the chip, the better it functions. We clearly see that now in the products different computer companies offer in the mearket. Computer integration in lives have been remarkebly fascinating. Thanks for Mr. G. Moore’s observation.

]]> By: The Law of Mobility » Blog Archive » Enabling Technology: Week of 3/04/07 http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91705 The Law of Mobility » Blog Archive » Enabling Technology: Week of 3/04/07 Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:45:48 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91705 <p>[...] Moore’s Law [...]</p> [...] Moore’s Law [...]

]]> By: Duane Snider http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91703 Duane Snider Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:21:37 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91703 <p>Moore's law stated a DOUBLING of computing power every 18 months. That's a geometric progression. We now cannot half the size of transistors any more, and still get the heat out. So now Intel is doing tricks like combining multiple processors on one chip substrate. So the transistor counts will be proportional to the area of the chip. And the compute power will only be increasing linearly in time.</p> Moore’s law stated a DOUBLING of computing power every 18 months. That’s a geometric progression. We now cannot half the size of transistors any more, and still get the heat out. So now Intel is doing tricks like combining multiple processors on one chip substrate. So the transistor counts will be proportional to the area of the chip. And the compute power will only be increasing linearly in time.

]]> By: saran http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91693 saran Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:56:47 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91693 <p>Fancy title, otherwise I didn’t read full content except the first 2 lines in the feed. Kind rgrds Saran</p> Fancy title, otherwise I didn’t read full content except the first 2 lines in the feed.
Kind rgrds
Saran

]]> By: Om Malik http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91697 Om Malik Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:45:14 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91697 <p>Versioning - simpler way to explain and a better headline - come on you got to give me that ;-)</p> Versioning - simpler way to explain and a better headline - come on you got to give me that ;-)

]]> By: saran http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91699 saran Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:10:12 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91699 <p>You are versioning law? I guess nothing static in this world. everything is versioned one day. for end user, the computer speed basically not mainly based on processor power, it also includes capacity/access speed of RAM/HardDisk/network. Hence only OS vendors mainly depend on Moore’s law. Even though the law defines transistor count, still we are roughly measuring the processor power. Grid infrastructure with mobile devices could break the law!</p> <p>Kind rgrds saran</p> You are versioning law? I guess nothing static in this world. everything is versioned one day. for end user, the computer speed basically not mainly based on processor power, it also includes capacity/access speed of RAM/HardDisk/network. Hence only OS vendors mainly depend on Moore’s law. Even though the law defines transistor count, still we are roughly measuring the processor power. Grid infrastructure with mobile devices could break the law!

Kind rgrds
saran

]]> By: Derek Anderson http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91695 Derek Anderson Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:17:50 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91695 <p>I believe that comment should be directed to Drew Lanza...not Om</p> <p>you're welcome!</p> <p>--D</p> I believe that comment should be directed to Drew Lanza…not Om

you’re welcome!

–D

]]> By: Yohay http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91701 Yohay Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:11:59 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-91701 <p>Thanks for clearing that out. I was certain that Moore's law referred to clock speed...</p> Thanks for clearing that out. I was certain that Moore’s law referred to clock speed…

]]>