<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moore&#8217;s Law 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 06:59:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How the Drive for Smaller Gadgets Is A Boon for Electric Cars</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How the Drive for Smaller Gadgets Is A Boon for Electric Cars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] technology for laptops and gadgets. Auto and battery makers lack the tech industry maxim that, (as Om put it back in 2007) has made millionaires out of geeks: Moore&#8217;s Law, which says the number of transistors on a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology for laptops and gadgets. Auto and battery makers lack the tech industry maxim that, (as Om put it back in 2007) has made millionaires out of geeks: Moore&#8217;s Law, which says the number of transistors on a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transitioning From The Enterprise To The Cloud &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Transitioning From The Enterprise To The Cloud &#187; Blog Archive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Moore’s Law has enabled new applications by powering computing on an exponential price/performance curve. But increasingly, the proliferation of a new generation of large-scale applications is being constrained by another price/performance curve that hasn’t shown much improvement: IT operations and the cost of delivery. To create ever more sophisticated applications that can be delivered from public or private clouds, we have to ride a delivery cost curve that looks more like Moore’s Law. Otherwise, we’ll choke on our systems. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moore’s Law has enabled new applications by powering computing on an exponential price/performance curve. But increasingly, the proliferation of a new generation of large-scale applications is being constrained by another price/performance curve that hasn’t shown much improvement: IT operations and the cost of delivery. To create ever more sophisticated applications that can be delivered from public or private clouds, we have to ride a delivery cost curve that looks more like Moore’s Law. Otherwise, we’ll choke on our systems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Clouds: IT Operations Finally Meet Moore’s Law &#124; Design Website</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Private Clouds: IT Operations Finally Meet Moore’s Law &#124; Design Website]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Moore&#8217;s Law has enabled new applications by powering computing on an exponential price/performance curve. But increasingly, the proliferation of a new generation of large-scale applications is being constrained by another price/performance curve that hasn&#8217;t shown much improvement: IT operations and the cost of delivery. To create ever more sophisticated applications that can be delivered from public or private clouds, we have to ride a delivery cost curve that looks more like Moore&#8217;s Law. Otherwise, we&#8217;ll choke on our systems. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moore&#8217;s Law has enabled new applications by powering computing on an exponential price/performance curve. But increasingly, the proliferation of a new generation of large-scale applications is being constrained by another price/performance curve that hasn&#8217;t shown much improvement: IT operations and the cost of delivery. To create ever more sophisticated applications that can be delivered from public or private clouds, we have to ride a delivery cost curve that looks more like Moore&#8217;s Law. Otherwise, we&#8217;ll choke on our systems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Clouds: IT Operations Finally Meet Moore&#8217;s Law</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Private Clouds: IT Operations Finally Meet Moore&#8217;s Law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Gilbert, Juergen Urbanski  &#124; Wednesday, June 24, 2009 &#124; 12:00 AM PT &#124; 0 comments    Moore&#8217;s Law has enabled new applications by powering computing on an exponential price/performance curve. But [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gilbert, Juergen Urbanski  | Wednesday, June 24, 2009 | 12:00 AM PT | 0 comments    Moore&#8217;s Law has enabled new applications by powering computing on an exponential price/performance curve. But [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artificial Moore&#8217;s Law for Cleantech: Renewable Standards, by Steps</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artificial Moore&#8217;s Law for Cleantech: Renewable Standards, by Steps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] months, made its mark as a tech industry maxim that could turn geeks into millionaires. Then came the next version, with cell phones and mobile devices. Now, with a national renewable portfolio standard in the works, chip and solar [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months, made its mark as a tech industry maxim that could turn geeks into millionaires. Then came the next version, with cell phones and mobile devices. Now, with a national renewable portfolio standard in the works, chip and solar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Speed Test</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Computer Speed Test]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The title certainly got people&#039;s attention!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m looking forward to the way things are going.  I love when different technologies are combined together to make wonderful devices.  The only thing I&#039;m not fancy about is when devices are created and given restrictions on who you can use it with (ie certain cell phones for certain carriers).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I spent hundreds or thousands of dollars on an all in one device, I don&#039;t want to be bound to a particular cell phone company.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also love company&#039;s who open source their devices or at a least allow it&#039;s users to develope extensions/software for the devices.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Take care,
Paul&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title certainly got people&#8217;s attention!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to the way things are going.  I love when different technologies are combined together to make wonderful devices.  The only thing I&#8217;m not fancy about is when devices are created and given restrictions on who you can use it with (ie certain cell phones for certain carriers).</p>
<p>If I spent hundreds or thousands of dollars on an all in one device, I don&#8217;t want to be bound to a particular cell phone company.</p>
<p>I also love company&#8217;s who open source their devices or at a least allow it&#8217;s users to develope extensions/software for the devices.</p>
<p>Take care,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheena</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 06:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Moore&#039;s Law is currently applicabble in today&#039;s techlogy. The more transistors there is in the chip, the better it functions. We clearly see that now in the products different computer companies offer in the mearket. Computer integration in lives have been remarkebly fascinating. Thanks for Mr. G. Moore&#039;s observation.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore&#8217;s Law is currently applicabble in today&#8217;s techlogy. The more transistors there is in the chip, the better it functions. We clearly see that now in the products different computer companies offer in the mearket. Computer integration in lives have been remarkebly fascinating. Thanks for Mr. G. Moore&#8217;s observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Enabling Technology: Week of 3/04/07</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Enabling Technology: Week of 3/04/07]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Moore&#8217;s Law [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moore&#8217;s Law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Snider</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duane Snider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Moore&#039;s law stated a DOUBLING of computing power every 18 months.  That&#039;s a geometric progression.  We now cannot half the size of transistors any more, and still get the heat out.  So now Intel is doing tricks like combining multiple processors on one chip substrate.  So the transistor counts will be proportional to the area of the chip.  And    the compute power will only be increasing linearly in time.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore&#8217;s law stated a DOUBLING of computing power every 18 months.  That&#8217;s a geometric progression.  We now cannot half the size of transistors any more, and still get the heat out.  So now Intel is doing tricks like combining multiple processors on one chip substrate.  So the transistor counts will be proportional to the area of the chip.  And    the compute power will only be increasing linearly in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saran</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[saran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/moores-law-20/#comment-136637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Fancy title, otherwise I didn’t read full content except the first 2 lines in the feed.
Kind rgrds
Saran&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fancy title, otherwise I didn’t read full content except the first 2 lines in the feed.<br />
Kind rgrds<br />
Saran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
