<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California, the Wi-Fi state</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: i4g.mobi &#187; Wee-Fry: Short Items for Friday, March 2</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[i4g.mobi &#187; Wee-Fry: Short Items for Friday, March 2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 06:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Round-up of California muni/metro projects: GigaOm runs the tally of projects across the state that will bring vast areas of Wi-Fi. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Round-up of California muni/metro projects: GigaOm runs the tally of projects across the state that will bring vast areas of Wi-Fi. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fires &#187; California, the Wi-Fi state</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fires &#187; California, the Wi-Fi state]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Original post by Katie Fehrenbacher [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Katie Fehrenbacher [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric DaVersa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric DaVersa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s actually only half of the list. Several cities such as Culver City and Santa Monica have pilots up, and RFPs out for more.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have 94 CA cities on my list...and those are only the ones with a public announcement of some sort. 517 cities in the US in total.  Yet that&#039;s only 5% of the municipalites in the USA.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s actually only half of the list. Several cities such as Culver City and Santa Monica have pilots up, and RFPs out for more.</p>
<p>I have 94 CA cities on my list&#8230;and those are only the ones with a public announcement of some sort. 517 cities in the US in total.  Yet that&#8217;s only 5% of the municipalites in the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esme Vos</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Esme Vos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I keep a list (regularly updated) of US cities (and counties) that have: (1) city- or countywide networks up and running; (2) city hotzones; (3) networks used for municipal purposes only such as public safety; and (4) definitive plans for a network (networks not yet up but an RFP or RFI has been issued).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The last update was end of December 2006 and I will be updating it again this month:
http://muniwireless.com/reports/docs/Dec-29-2006summary.pdf&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep a list (regularly updated) of US cities (and counties) that have: (1) city- or countywide networks up and running; (2) city hotzones; (3) networks used for municipal purposes only such as public safety; and (4) definitive plans for a network (networks not yet up but an RFP or RFI has been issued).</p>
<p>The last update was end of December 2006 and I will be updating it again this month:<br />
<a href="http://muniwireless.com/reports/docs/Dec-29-2006summary.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://muniwireless.com/reports/docs/Dec-29-2006summary.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Lemay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura Lemay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 00:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Los Gatos (south end of silicon valley) has had free no-ads municipal wifi since 2003. A quick google shows that it was a company called Firetide that set up the mesh.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Los Gatos (south end of silicon valley) has had free no-ads municipal wifi since 2003. A quick google shows that it was a company called Firetide that set up the mesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bole</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Bole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I will give you that a big state like California has engaged with municipal wifi, but at the moment it is a mile wide and an inch deep.  I would push some friendly neighbor rivalry and suggest that you look north to Oregon for deeper engagements with both mesh wireless and WiMax.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But ultimately the real interesting question is not do you have a network up, but what are you doing with that network.  What intentional objective is a city trying to accomplish by encouraging or even helping to implement a network?  That seems to be a lost question in many deployments today.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will give you that a big state like California has engaged with municipal wifi, but at the moment it is a mile wide and an inch deep.  I would push some friendly neighbor rivalry and suggest that you look north to Oregon for deeper engagements with both mesh wireless and WiMax.</p>
<p>But ultimately the real interesting question is not do you have a network up, but what are you doing with that network.  What intentional objective is a city trying to accomplish by encouraging or even helping to implement a network?  That seems to be a lost question in many deployments today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AaronZ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AaronZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Cupertino is on the list.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW - The Yankee Group &lt;a href=&quot;http://vantelo.com/rss/2007/02/08/yankee-group-myths-and-realities-of-wi-fi-mesh-networking/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;issued a report&lt;/a&gt; that covers some of the WiFi technologies and deployments at universities and the like. The way I read it, their take is that the technology is ready for campus environments (universities, corporate, etc.) but not quite for city-wide deployments.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cupertino is on the list.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; The Yankee Group <a href="http://vantelo.com/rss/2007/02/08/yankee-group-myths-and-realities-of-wi-fi-mesh-networking/" rel="nofollow">issued a report</a> that covers some of the WiFi technologies and deployments at universities and the like. The way I read it, their take is that the technology is ready for campus environments (universities, corporate, etc.) but not quite for city-wide deployments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Fehrenbacher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie Fehrenbacher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Right thanks.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: routerguy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[routerguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/cali-wi-fi/#comment-136139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Fullerton CA has muni wi-fi as well.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fullertonwireless.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fullerton wireless page&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fullerton CA has muni wi-fi as well.  <a href="http://www.fullertonwireless.com" rel="nofollow">fullerton wireless page</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

