<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harrison Cops to PS3 Mistakes and Talks About Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/02/28/harrison-cops-to-ps3-mistakes-and-talks-about-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/28/harrison-cops-to-ps3-mistakes-and-talks-about-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon R.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/28/harrison-cops-to-ps3-mistakes-and-talks-about-future/#comment-135982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigagamez.com/2007/02/28/harrison-cops-to-ps3-mistakes-and-talks-about-future/#comment-135982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So N&#039;Gai ends up being good for something, finally.

Although, that bit at the end mystified me. Do we know that the PS3 is that solid yet? After the fragility of the PSX and PS2, we&#039;re supposed to assume that the PS3 is going to be a rock, and that with the manufacturing cost soaring through the roof, they&#039;re not going to cut corners somewhere? Or is it that the fucker&#039;s so expensive BECAUSE they didn&#039;t cut corners? Or maybe that they cut the wrong corners in favor of useless shit like the Blu-Ray drive?

And the bit about the complexity in the exact same answer? The PSX and PS2 were very prone to early failure, yet we&#039;re to believe that the &quot;exponentially more complicated&quot; PS3 is going to be more reliable?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So N&#8217;Gai ends up being good for something, finally.</p>
<p>Although, that bit at the end mystified me. Do we know that the PS3 is that solid yet? After the fragility of the PSX and PS2, we&#8217;re supposed to assume that the PS3 is going to be a rock, and that with the manufacturing cost soaring through the roof, they&#8217;re not going to cut corners somewhere? Or is it that the fucker&#8217;s so expensive BECAUSE they didn&#8217;t cut corners? Or maybe that they cut the wrong corners in favor of useless shit like the Blu-Ray drive?</p>
<p>And the bit about the complexity in the exact same answer? The PSX and PS2 were very prone to early failure, yet we&#8217;re to believe that the &#8220;exponentially more complicated&#8221; PS3 is going to be more reliable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon R.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/28/harrison-cops-to-ps3-mistakes-and-talks-about-future/#comment-168662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigagamez.com/2007/02/28/harrison-cops-to-ps3-mistakes-and-talks-about-future/#comment-168662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So N&#039;Gai ends up being good for something, finally.

Although, that bit at the end mystified me. Do we know that the PS3 is that solid yet? After the fragility of the PSX and PS2, we&#039;re supposed to assume that the PS3 is going to be a rock, and that with the manufacturing cost soaring through the roof, they&#039;re not going to cut corners somewhere? Or is it that the fucker&#039;s so expensive BECAUSE they didn&#039;t cut corners? Or maybe that they cut the wrong corners in favor of useless shit like the Blu-Ray drive?

And the bit about the complexity in the exact same answer? The PSX and PS2 were very prone to early failure, yet we&#039;re to believe that the &quot;exponentially more complicated&quot; PS3 is going to be more reliable?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So N&#8217;Gai ends up being good for something, finally.</p>
<p>Although, that bit at the end mystified me. Do we know that the PS3 is that solid yet? After the fragility of the PSX and PS2, we&#8217;re supposed to assume that the PS3 is going to be a rock, and that with the manufacturing cost soaring through the roof, they&#8217;re not going to cut corners somewhere? Or is it that the fucker&#8217;s so expensive BECAUSE they didn&#8217;t cut corners? Or maybe that they cut the wrong corners in favor of useless shit like the Blu-Ray drive?</p>
<p>And the bit about the complexity in the exact same answer? The PSX and PS2 were very prone to early failure, yet we&#8217;re to believe that the &#8220;exponentially more complicated&#8221; PS3 is going to be more reliable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

