<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iowa Telcos: AT&amp;T Owes $12 Million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/02/26/iowa-telcos-att-owes-12-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/26/iowa-telcos-att-owes-12-million/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:58:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Conferencing CEO Asks FCC to Keep on Google Voice</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/26/iowa-telcos-att-owes-12-million/#comment-135833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Free Conferencing CEO Asks FCC to Keep on Google Voice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/iowa-telcos-att-owes-12-million/#comment-135833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] may be taking advantage of a legal loophole that the telecommunications companies and now Google want closed, but it&#8217;s not clearly illegal (although the loophole is closing). And by providing voice [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may be taking advantage of a legal loophole that the telecommunications companies and now Google want closed, but it&#8217;s not clearly illegal (although the loophole is closing). And by providing voice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad dupee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/26/iowa-telcos-att-owes-12-million/#comment-135832</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brad dupee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/iowa-telcos-att-owes-12-million/#comment-135832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;has this been paid?  what is the tab now if not...several months later?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has this been paid?  what is the tab now if not&#8230;several months later?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Allfreecalls.net: We Will Return</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/26/iowa-telcos-att-owes-12-million/#comment-135831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; Allfreecalls.net: We Will Return]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 07:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/iowa-telcos-att-owes-12-million/#comment-135831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] will forget about it and it will all go away,&#8221; Phelan said of the AT&amp;T-Iowa Telcos lawyers brawl. &#8220;But in the meantime the Internet guys got squeezed out.&#8221; Phelan says Allfreecalls.net [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will forget about it and it will all go away,&#8221; Phelan said of the AT&amp;T-Iowa Telcos lawyers brawl. &#8220;But in the meantime the Internet guys got squeezed out.&#8221; Phelan says Allfreecalls.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Goebel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/26/iowa-telcos-att-owes-12-million/#comment-135830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markus Goebel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/iowa-telcos-att-owes-12-million/#comment-135830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Oh, yes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That sounds very interesting to me. It seems that I am one of the mentioned &quot;fans of telco legal battles&quot;. In Germany this wouldn&#039;t be possible, I suppose, because as a densely populated country we don&#039;t have any rural telcos.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s see what&#039;s happening next! Appeals like a tech telenovela to me. Stay tuned.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;;)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yes.</p>
<p>That sounds very interesting to me. It seems that I am one of the mentioned &#8220;fans of telco legal battles&#8221;. In Germany this wouldn&#8217;t be possible, I suppose, because as a densely populated country we don&#8217;t have any rural telcos.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what&#8217;s happening next! Appeals like a tech telenovela to me. Stay tuned.</p>
<p>;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

