<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qwest: &#8216;Free&#8217; Calls cost us &#8216;Millions&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Vanier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andre Vanier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rondee does not have the problems the other free conference call services have been facing.  This is because Rondee has never been involved in the sort of practices that the carriers have been complaining about.  Rondee&#039;s conferencing bridge is in a Tier 1 metropolitan market (San Diego: 619-276-6333).

Andre Vanier, Co-Founder, Rondee, Inc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rondee does not have the problems the other free conference call services have been facing.  This is because Rondee has never been involved in the sort of practices that the carriers have been complaining about.  Rondee&#8217;s conferencing bridge is in a Tier 1 metropolitan market (San Diego: 619-276-6333).</p>
<p>Andre Vanier, Co-Founder, Rondee, Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenixnordic Group &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Empire Strikes Back: FCC Probes Google Voice (Updated)</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fenixnordic Group &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Empire Strikes Back: FCC Probes Google Voice (Updated)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] including AT&amp;T, have long complained (and sued) over so-called &#8220;arbitrage&#8221; sites that set up in rural areas offering free [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] including AT&amp;T, have long complained (and sued) over so-called &#8220;arbitrage&#8221; sites that set up in rural areas offering free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenixnordic Group &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Empire Strikes Back: FCC Probes Google Voice</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fenixnordic Group &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Empire Strikes Back: FCC Probes Google Voice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] there are some provisions for blocking calls to known scams.  Carriers, including AT&amp;T, have long complained (and sued) over so-called &#8220;arbitrage&#8221; sites that set up in rural areas offering free [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there are some provisions for blocking calls to known scams.  Carriers, including AT&amp;T, have long complained (and sued) over so-called &#8220;arbitrage&#8221; sites that set up in rural areas offering free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Death By Lawyer: 10 Cool Sites We Miss &#187; CatchDude Articles</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Death By Lawyer: 10 Cool Sites We Miss &#187; CatchDude Articles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 03:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Fonpods was a service that offered free podcast listening over the phone. For some reason, this allegedly cost the telecommunications industry “millions” (back then they didn’t yet invent billions and trillions, hence the modest numbers), so the service was shut down. Ok, we can understand why they went after Allfreecalls.net (which is, btw, online again) and FreeConferenceCall.com, but podcasts? Millions, they say. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fonpods was a service that offered free podcast listening over the phone. For some reason, this allegedly cost the telecommunications industry “millions” (back then they didn’t yet invent billions and trillions, hence the modest numbers), so the service was shut down. Ok, we can understand why they went after Allfreecalls.net (which is, btw, online again) and FreeConferenceCall.com, but podcasts? Millions, they say. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Russ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Does this same criticism apply to Rondee (www.rondee.com) -- they do free conference calling too.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this same criticism apply to Rondee (www.rondee.com) &#8212; they do free conference calling too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los abogados asesinamos sitios web at Miguel Angel Mata &#124;&#124; Derecho y Tecnologia &#124;&#124;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Los abogados asesinamos sitios web at Miguel Angel Mata &#124;&#124; Derecho y Tecnologia &#124;&#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Fonpods. Un servicio que te permitía escuchar podcasts a través de tu teléfono móvil. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fonpods. Un servicio que te permitía escuchar podcasts a través de tu teléfono móvil. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vagabundia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Las webs muertas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vagabundia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Las webs muertas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Fonpods ofrecía servicios de podcast gratuitos,&#160; a través del teléfono. Las compañías de telecomunicaciones gritaron:&#160; &#8220;perdemos millones, ¿qué pretenden de nosotros? ¿que tengamos que invertir? cierrren el sitio&#8221; y lo cerraron. Y después siguieron Allfreecalls.net y FreeConferenceCall.com. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fonpods ofrecía servicios de podcast gratuitos,&nbsp; a través del teléfono. Las compañías de telecomunicaciones gritaron:&nbsp; &#8220;perdemos millones, ¿qué pretenden de nosotros? ¿que tengamos que invertir? cierrren el sitio&#8221; y lo cerraron. Y después siguieron Allfreecalls.net y FreeConferenceCall.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Death By Lawyer: 10 Cool Sites We Miss&#160;by&#160;The Best Article Every day</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#160; Death By Lawyer: 10 Cool Sites We Miss&#160;by&#160;The Best Article Every day]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 02:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Fonpods was a service that offered free podcast listening over the phone. For some reason, this allegedly cost the telecommunications industry &#8220;millions&#8221; (back then they didn&#8217;t yet invent billions and trillions, hence the modest numbers), so the service was shut down. Ok, we can understand why they went after Allfreecalls.net (which is, btw, online again) and FreeConferenceCall.com, but podcasts? Millions, they say. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fonpods was a service that offered free podcast listening over the phone. For some reason, this allegedly cost the telecommunications industry &#8220;millions&#8221; (back then they didn&#8217;t yet invent billions and trillions, hence the modest numbers), so the service was shut down. Ok, we can understand why they went after Allfreecalls.net (which is, btw, online again) and FreeConferenceCall.com, but podcasts? Millions, they say. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proxieslist.net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[proxieslist.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 12:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Fonpods was a service that offered free podcast listening over the phone. For some reason, this allegedly cost the telecommunications industry &#8220;millions&#8221; (back then they didn&#8217;t yet invent billions and trillions, hence the modest numbers), so the service was shut down. Ok, we can understand why they went after Allfreecalls.net (which is, btw, online again) and FreeConferenceCall.com, but podcasts? Millions, they say. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fonpods was a service that offered free podcast listening over the phone. For some reason, this allegedly cost the telecommunications industry &#8220;millions&#8221; (back then they didn&#8217;t yet invent billions and trillions, hence the modest numbers), so the service was shut down. Ok, we can understand why they went after Allfreecalls.net (which is, btw, online again) and FreeConferenceCall.com, but podcasts? Millions, they say. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Death By Lawyer: 10 Cool Sites We Miss</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Death By Lawyer: 10 Cool Sites We Miss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 12:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Fonpods was a service that offered free podcast listening over the phone. For some reason, this allegedly cost the telecommunications industry &#8220;millions&#8221; (back then they didn&#8217;t yet invent billions and trillions, hence the modest numbers), so the service was shut down. Ok, we can understand why they went after Allfreecalls.net (which is, btw, online again) and FreeConferenceCall.com, but podcasts? Millions, they say. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fonpods was a service that offered free podcast listening over the phone. For some reason, this allegedly cost the telecommunications industry &#8220;millions&#8221; (back then they didn&#8217;t yet invent billions and trillions, hence the modest numbers), so the service was shut down. Ok, we can understand why they went after Allfreecalls.net (which is, btw, online again) and FreeConferenceCall.com, but podcasts? Millions, they say. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anony mouse</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anony mouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The FCC ruled on a similar aspect already, and this could actually help the LECs and others on that side of the fence.  Audiotext v AT&amp;T from 2000-2004 (it  took a few years to resolve the case).  The basic premise of this case is audiotext negotiated a low rate (5 cents/min) to the UK then proceeded to call a bunch of 700 numbers they were paid 13 cents/min for.  It cost AT&amp;T more than that to terminate the call.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While audiotext was calling themselves, something not alledged here, the base of paying less per minute than it costs to complete the call and revenue sharing remains the same.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt; 35.  Although we by no means endorse the kind of business conduct that AudioText admittedly engaged in here, we have no authority to depart from the well-settled filed tariff doctrine simply because we wish to censure certain business conduct.  Instead, the Act places the burden on carriers such as AT&amp;T to protect themselves against customer conduct they deem unfair or undesirable by incorporating appropriate safeguards in their contract and/or tariff provisions.  In this case, AT&amp;T failed to take such protective measures before contracting with AudioText.  Accordingly, because we find that AT&amp;T&#039;s suspension of AudioText&#039;s service on September 15, 2000 was not authorized under section 2.9.6. of the tariff, we rule in AudioText&#039;s favor on these counts.
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The FCC ruled completely in audiotexts favour and stated that AT&amp;T violated their tariff when they shut off audiotexts service and (redundant claims were tossed merely becuase they were redundant and were not reviewed).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-32A1.html
they have a pdf as well, but this ensures that everyone can read it easily.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCC ruled on a similar aspect already, and this could actually help the LECs and others on that side of the fence.  Audiotext v AT&amp;T from 2000-2004 (it  took a few years to resolve the case).  The basic premise of this case is audiotext negotiated a low rate (5 cents/min) to the UK then proceeded to call a bunch of 700 numbers they were paid 13 cents/min for.  It cost AT&amp;T more than that to terminate the call.</p>
<p>While audiotext was calling themselves, something not alledged here, the base of paying less per minute than it costs to complete the call and revenue sharing remains the same.</p>
<pre><code> 35.  Although we by no means endorse the kind of business conduct that AudioText admittedly engaged in here, we have no authority to depart from the well-settled filed tariff doctrine simply because we wish to censure certain business conduct.  Instead, the Act places the burden on carriers such as AT&amp;T to protect themselves against customer conduct they deem unfair or undesirable by incorporating appropriate safeguards in their contract and/or tariff provisions.  In this case, AT&amp;T failed to take such protective measures before contracting with AudioText.  Accordingly, because we find that AT&amp;T's suspension of AudioText's service on September 15, 2000 was not authorized under section 2.9.6. of the tariff, we rule in AudioText's favor on these counts.
</code></pre>
<p>The FCC ruled completely in audiotexts favour and stated that AT&amp;T violated their tariff when they shut off audiotexts service and (redundant claims were tossed merely becuase they were redundant and were not reviewed).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-32A1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-32A1.html</a><br />
they have a pdf as well, but this ensures that everyone can read it easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Free conference companies are figting back.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://wactivist.com/article/626/it-starts-wireless-carriers-block-freeconferencecom&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Remember that Qwest and AT&amp;T think they are doing favors for people or end users. They are saying these calls cost us millions of dollars, but who paid the bill? The customers pay Qwest and AT&amp;T for their bills, but then Qwest and AT&amp;T don&#039;t pay the companies. Who is in the wrong there?
Cingular and AT&amp;T jam phone networks at night for text and toll free numbers for the american idol show. Maybe these calls should be blocked from the local side?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;OTHER &#039;IDOL&#039; CARPETBAGGERS: Last season,
 Cingular, the provider of mobile services to the show, rang up an astonishing 41.5 million text messages from the show&#039;s voting system. In the quarter that just ended in March -- smack dab in middle of &quot;Idol&quot; season -- the company reported a 9% increase in revenue and a profit of $350 million, and attributed it partly to &quot;Idol.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cingular has jumped heavily on the &quot;Idol&quot; wagon as the show&#039;s popularity has grown. It now sells ringtones of &quot;Idol&quot; performances as they happen. And it recently launched a service that allows the 70 million MySpace subscribers to sell their own &quot;Idol&quot;-like karaoke performances as ringtones via the site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Others gleefully join in. Coke pays a hefty sponsorship fee but gets prominent product-placement throughout the program. Vidgame firm Konami is said to be planning an ambitious &quot;Idol&quot; game. And in licensing that may really stretch the brand-extension cord, Mattel has &quot;Barbie American Idol -- Rockin&#039; Recording Studio&quot; while the costume firm Disguise offers the &quot;Future American Idol Toddler Costume.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free conference companies are figting back.</p>
<p><a href="http://wactivist.com/article/626/it-starts-wireless-carriers-block-freeconferencecom" rel="nofollow">http://wactivist.com/article/626/it-starts-wireless-carriers-block-freeconferencecom</a></p>
<p>Remember that Qwest and AT&amp;T think they are doing favors for people or end users. They are saying these calls cost us millions of dollars, but who paid the bill? The customers pay Qwest and AT&amp;T for their bills, but then Qwest and AT&amp;T don&#8217;t pay the companies. Who is in the wrong there?<br />
Cingular and AT&amp;T jam phone networks at night for text and toll free numbers for the american idol show. Maybe these calls should be blocked from the local side?</p>
<p>OTHER &#8216;IDOL&#8217; CARPETBAGGERS: Last season,<br />
 Cingular, the provider of mobile services to the show, rang up an astonishing 41.5 million text messages from the show&#8217;s voting system. In the quarter that just ended in March &#8212; smack dab in middle of &#8220;Idol&#8221; season &#8212; the company reported a 9% increase in revenue and a profit of $350 million, and attributed it partly to &#8220;Idol.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cingular has jumped heavily on the &#8220;Idol&#8221; wagon as the show&#8217;s popularity has grown. It now sells ringtones of &#8220;Idol&#8221; performances as they happen. And it recently launched a service that allows the 70 million MySpace subscribers to sell their own &#8220;Idol&#8221;-like karaoke performances as ringtones via the site.</p>
<p>Others gleefully join in. Coke pays a hefty sponsorship fee but gets prominent product-placement throughout the program. Vidgame firm Konami is said to be planning an ambitious &#8220;Idol&#8221; game. And in licensing that may really stretch the brand-extension cord, Mattel has &#8220;Barbie American Idol &#8212; Rockin&#8217; Recording Studio&#8221; while the costume firm Disguise offers the &#8220;Future American Idol Toddler Costume.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fonpods in DeadPool</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fonpods in DeadPool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] 16 and is yet to come back online (and it probably won&#8217;t), Fonpods is now offline after being named a defendant in that expanding litigation. The domain name appears to be under the control of Qwest, the [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 16 and is yet to come back online (and it probably won&#8217;t), Fonpods is now offline after being named a defendant in that expanding litigation. The domain name appears to be under the control of Qwest, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;No deal has been struck.  The Iowa telco&#039;s have in fact sued AT&amp;T in New York for nonpayment.  These are published rates and this activity has been going on for years.  It is part of the design of telecom regs.  The big guys attack what they pay, but not what they collect.  In fact, this creates the opportunity for them to make money off of the long distance fees people pay to get to the free conferencing or chat service (that part is not free).  this allows the FCC to find a way to subsidize rural guys without raising the universal service fund fees, and it has created an entirely new market as it has lowered the cost of conferencing and chat to levels that the old bell monopolies can&#039;t stand.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is all a bullying ploy to keep new players out of the market.  And it is working.  But the correct venue is the FCC which sets and reviews these rates (and the volumes sold under them) every two years.  We are in the middle of that process now, which is why Qwest and AT&amp;T are pursuing these groundless suits.  They know no one likes being sued and even a worthless suit is expensive for startups and these small, unsophisticated rural guys.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But don&#039;t believe the nonsense in their one sided corporate spin.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No deal has been struck.  The Iowa telco&#8217;s have in fact sued AT&amp;T in New York for nonpayment.  These are published rates and this activity has been going on for years.  It is part of the design of telecom regs.  The big guys attack what they pay, but not what they collect.  In fact, this creates the opportunity for them to make money off of the long distance fees people pay to get to the free conferencing or chat service (that part is not free).  this allows the FCC to find a way to subsidize rural guys without raising the universal service fund fees, and it has created an entirely new market as it has lowered the cost of conferencing and chat to levels that the old bell monopolies can&#8217;t stand.</p>
<p>This is all a bullying ploy to keep new players out of the market.  And it is working.  But the correct venue is the FCC which sets and reviews these rates (and the volumes sold under them) every two years.  We are in the middle of that process now, which is why Qwest and AT&amp;T are pursuing these groundless suits.  They know no one likes being sued and even a worthless suit is expensive for startups and these small, unsophisticated rural guys.</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t believe the nonsense in their one sided corporate spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Why is At&amp;t AND Quest suing?  You would think that Quest would wait to see what happens with AT&amp;T&#039;s suite before getting into a costly legal battle. It&#039;s like throwing a big juicy steak into what could be shark infested waters, and then jumping in yourself before it hits the water.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d bet anything that AT&amp;T struck some sort of deal already and Quest is trying to get in on it too and so they don&#039;t get screwed down the line when this arbitrage is officially allowed by the courts.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is At&amp;t AND Quest suing?  You would think that Quest would wait to see what happens with AT&amp;T&#8217;s suite before getting into a costly legal battle. It&#8217;s like throwing a big juicy steak into what could be shark infested waters, and then jumping in yourself before it hits the water.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d bet anything that AT&amp;T struck some sort of deal already and Quest is trying to get in on it too and so they don&#8217;t get screwed down the line when this arbitrage is officially allowed by the courts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/23/iowa-free-calling-schemes/#comment-135662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;T Doen&#039;t like paying access fees to anyone - check out http://www.xchangemag.com/articles/525/525_461front4.html&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T Doen&#8217;t like paying access fees to anyone &#8211; check out <a href="http://www.xchangemag.com/articles/525/525_461front4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.xchangemag.com/articles/525/525_461front4.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

