Comments on: Avaya to add Voice to Google Apps http://gigaom.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/ The Business of Technology Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:03:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 By: The API is the KEY http://gigaom.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88431 The API is the KEY Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:25:37 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88431 <p>The Avaya integration is pretty cool. But there should be more CTI integration to come… the API of Google Apps make that possible. For example we are developing an FREE open source "business application platform" (think salesforce.com). Our first application is working tightly integrated with GOOGLE APPS. http://www.applicationexchange.com.</p> The Avaya integration is pretty cool. But there should be more CTI integration to come… the API of Google Apps make that possible. For example we are developing an FREE open source “business application platform” (think salesforce.com). Our first application is working tightly integrated with GOOGLE APPS. (link) .

]]> By: Basement Tapes » Avaya to add Voice to Google Apps http://gigaom.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88430 Basement Tapes » Avaya to add Voice to Google Apps Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:15:11 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88430 <p>[...] GigaOM » Avaya to add Voice to Google Apps [...]</p> [...] GigaOM » Avaya to add Voice to Google Apps [...]

]]> By: Venkk http://gigaom.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88429 Venkk Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:55:54 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88429 <p>I think IBM still plays a major role in corporate IT context and I'm surprised that its role is not mentioned here</p> I think IBM still plays a major role in corporate IT context and I’m surprised that its role is not mentioned here

]]> By: km4 http://gigaom.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88428 km4 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:49:23 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88428 <blockquote> <p>wouldn’t the “right” thing to do be for Google to have a SIP interface so that it’s not Avaya or Cisco or anyone in particular but an open standard instead?</p> </blockquote> <p>YES !</p>

wouldn’t the “right” thing to do be for Google to have a SIP interface so that it’s not Avaya or Cisco or anyone in particular but an open standard instead?

YES !

]]> By: In Other Tech News… at Ministry of Tech | The Best of Tech http://gigaom.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88425 In Other Tech News… at Ministry of Tech | The Best of Tech Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:52:46 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88425 <p>[...] up cellular networks [Ars Technica] Guy tracks where XP wallpaper photo was taken [Toronto Star] Avaya to add Voice to Google Apps [...]</p> [...] up cellular networks [Ars Technica] Guy tracks where XP wallpaper photo was taken [Toronto Star] Avaya to add Voice to Google Apps [...]

]]> By: SinoLogic » Avaya se une a Google para ofrecer VoIP http://gigaom.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88426 SinoLogic » Avaya se une a Google para ofrecer VoIP Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:08:32 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88426 <p>[...] Vía: GigaOM. [...]</p> [...] Vía: GigaOM. [...]

]]> By: rob http://gigaom.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88427 rob Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:23:57 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/avaya-to-add-voice-to-google-apps/#comment-88427 <p>wouldn't the "right" thing to do be for Google to have a SIP interface so that it's not Avaya or Cisco or anyone in particuliar but an open standard instead?</p> wouldn’t the “right” thing to do be for Google to have a SIP interface so that it’s not Avaya or Cisco or anyone in particuliar but an open standard instead?

]]>