<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007, the year of the tech IPO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Kim dot Org &#187; You Know It might be the Start of a Bubble When&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Kim dot Org &#187; You Know It might be the Start of a Bubble When&#8230;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] they start posting articles on articles about how Tech IPOs are [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they start posting articles on articles about how Tech IPOs are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Glu Mobile, Aruba giddy up for IPOs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; Glu Mobile, Aruba giddy up for IPOs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] slow resurgence of the technology IPOs - Clearwire and BigBand Networks - has raised the hopes of many Silicon Valley companies that are [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] slow resurgence of the technology IPOs &#8211; Clearwire and BigBand Networks &#8211; has raised the hopes of many Silicon Valley companies that are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Is Clearwire worth $4 billion?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; Is Clearwire worth $4 billion?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] should be a red-letter day for all tech-IPO aspirants, for today Wall Street proved that a loss making company can go public, raise over half-a-billion [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should be a red-letter day for all tech-IPO aspirants, for today Wall Street proved that a loss making company can go public, raise over half-a-billion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayur</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mayur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I have looked in the past for sites that mention up and coming IPO&#039;s in the tech sector.  I wanted to get an idea from your readers if they have any sites they could suggest.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have looked in the past for sites that mention up and coming IPO&#8217;s in the tech sector.  I wanted to get an idea from your readers if they have any sites they could suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voiprookie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[voiprookie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Is veraz a voip vendor like acme that did a pretty good ipo..almost $1B marcap?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is veraz a voip vendor like acme that did a pretty good ipo..almost $1B marcap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaspal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaspal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Om,
You have a typo here. OPXT is still trading in the $17 range and not 20 cents a share&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Optical networking component start-up, Opnext (OPXT), a Hitachi spin-off went public last week7 and raised $254 million selling around 17 million shares. The stock opened at $17 and is now trading at 20 cents a share.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,<br />
You have a typo here. OPXT is still trading in the $17 range and not 20 cents a share&#8230;</p>
<p>Optical networking component start-up, Opnext (OPXT), a Hitachi spin-off went public last week7 and raised $254 million selling around 17 million shares. The stock opened at $17 and is now trading at 20 cents a share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t forget about the VMware &#039;IPO&#039; (actually, a spinout from EMC)..EMC bought it for $635 and it will command ~$5B on the open market.  They are only selling 10% of the equity and EMC is holding onto the rest.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget about the VMware &#8216;IPO&#8217; (actually, a spinout from EMC)..EMC bought it for $635 and it will command ~$5B on the open market.  They are only selling 10% of the equity and EMC is holding onto the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwayne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;2007 will be big for tech, but 2008 will be bigger.  The buildout of Networx, and the IPv6 transition, along with new technology such as Microvision&#039;s (www.mvis.com)laser items, will bring a huge surge in tech.  Will 2008 be bigger than 2007 for tech?  Probably.  Vista is estimated to be in the capital budgets for late 2007 and early 2008, which will bring even more tech spending.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2007 will be big for tech, but 2008 will be bigger.  The buildout of Networx, and the IPv6 transition, along with new technology such as Microvision&#8217;s (www.mvis.com)laser items, will bring a huge surge in tech.  Will 2008 be bigger than 2007 for tech?  Probably.  Vista is estimated to be in the capital budgets for late 2007 and early 2008, which will bring even more tech spending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Dewey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Dewey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I am pushing for a return to the IPO market. Companies with high goals deserve high returns. If you&#039;re a startup looking for a quick flip, then you&#039;re already setting your standards way too low.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Be profitable, not a gamble.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pushing for a return to the IPO market. Companies with high goals deserve high returns. If you&#8217;re a startup looking for a quick flip, then you&#8217;re already setting your standards way too low.</p>
<p>Be profitable, not a gamble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Wily</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Preston Wily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/tech-ipo-2007-candidates/#comment-135473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Another name I would add to that list is NewEgg - with $1.5B or so in revenue that ought to be a decent IPO.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another name I would add to that list is NewEgg &#8211; with $1.5B or so in revenue that ought to be a decent IPO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

