<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco buys XML startup Reactivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:29:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The ADC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The ADC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Forum Systems is still out there, but the rumor mill says it may be snatched up by someone else in the XML space.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cisco&#039;s AON is rumored to be dead. I suspect that either Reactivity will eventually replace Cisco&#039;s homegrown AON in its SONA initiative or that like it&#039;s ArrowPoint acquisition back in the day that Reactivity will stand side-by-side with AON and confuse the heck out of Cisco&#039;s customers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Local Director? CSM? ACE? Three lines, three feature sets, three products, one market. Cisco needs to consolidate internally instead of trying to play IBM. It can pretend its a software company all it wants, and can message that to the press, but its a hardware company and I don&#039;t believe that fragmentation is good for itself, its customers or the market in general.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forum Systems is still out there, but the rumor mill says it may be snatched up by someone else in the XML space.</p>
<p>Cisco&#8217;s AON is rumored to be dead. I suspect that either Reactivity will eventually replace Cisco&#8217;s homegrown AON in its SONA initiative or that like it&#8217;s ArrowPoint acquisition back in the day that Reactivity will stand side-by-side with AON and confuse the heck out of Cisco&#8217;s customers.</p>
<p>Local Director? CSM? ACE? Three lines, three feature sets, three products, one market. Cisco needs to consolidate internally instead of trying to play IBM. It can pretend its a software company all it wants, and can message that to the press, but its a hardware company and I don&#8217;t believe that fragmentation is good for itself, its customers or the market in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 Raindrop</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1 Raindrop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Then They Were Fewer&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The market seems to have realized that XML security is important. Intel bought Sarvega, then IBM got its Data Power and now TMC reported Cisco Systems Inc., a leading supplier of Internet network equipment, has announced its intention to acquire Reacti&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Then They Were Fewer&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The market seems to have realized that XML security is important. Intel bought Sarvega, then IBM got its Data Power and now TMC reported Cisco Systems Inc., a leading supplier of Internet network equipment, has announced its intention to acquire Reacti&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Wonder how Cisco will position it&#039;s AON product with this reactivity announcement. AS AON was supposed to lead Cisco into the Application Oriented Networking world.
Possibly hedging it&#039;s bets..&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder how Cisco will position it&#8217;s AON product with this reactivity announcement. AS AON was supposed to lead Cisco into the Application Oriented Networking world.<br />
Possibly hedging it&#8217;s bets..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajeev</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rajeev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Smart move by Cisco! There are all indications that the market for such devices will really open up - especially as more and more organizations embrace the SOA wave and SOA/ESB infrastructure gets built out, one service at a time. SOA practitioners would be more than happy to hand off some of those XML crunching to the boxes rather than write software for it. As a poster observed earlier, IBM is quite strong in this space - but Cisco has enormous clout amongst the &quot;infratrsucture heads&quot; which alone should make it a strong competitor.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart move by Cisco! There are all indications that the market for such devices will really open up &#8211; especially as more and more organizations embrace the SOA wave and SOA/ESB infrastructure gets built out, one service at a time. SOA practitioners would be more than happy to hand off some of those XML crunching to the boxes rather than write software for it. As a poster observed earlier, IBM is quite strong in this space &#8211; but Cisco has enormous clout amongst the &#8220;infratrsucture heads&#8221; which alone should make it a strong competitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark O'Neill's Radio Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark O'Neill's Radio Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Congratulations to Reactivity&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Congratulations to Reactivity&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Large</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Large]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/cisco-buys-reactivity/#comment-135467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Smart move from CISCO, but they are a little late to the game. Intel snaped up Sarvega ages ago, and IBM bought Datapower which it has now bundled into the Websphere name.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Layer 7 seem to be available, but then they just build on Tarari supplied hardware, so perhapse they would be a better buy for someone looking to get into the SOA hardware business.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What IBM have done is very interesting, buy/build all the components from hardware through middleware and to management/development software for the whole end-to-end SOA system. I would look to AmberPoint being involved in a big M&amp;A soon, although I couldn&#039;t think from which side :)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart move from CISCO, but they are a little late to the game. Intel snaped up Sarvega ages ago, and IBM bought Datapower which it has now bundled into the Websphere name.</p>
<p>Layer 7 seem to be available, but then they just build on Tarari supplied hardware, so perhapse they would be a better buy for someone looking to get into the SOA hardware business.</p>
<p>What IBM have done is very interesting, buy/build all the components from hardware through middleware and to management/development software for the whole end-to-end SOA system. I would look to AmberPoint being involved in a big M&amp;A soon, although I couldn&#8217;t think from which side :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

