<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Taxonomy of Social Networks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: smithindavi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smithindavi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Smart piece and comments! Getting stuff done seems integral to any business related SN. The challenge is where do people want to belong or just pass through.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart piece and comments! Getting stuff done seems integral to any business related SN. The challenge is where do people want to belong or just pass through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Bow Wow Pow Wow with Dogster CEO &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My Bow Wow Pow Wow with Dogster CEO &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] surprisingly like weeds were eventually weeded out, bolstering my argument that social networking was merely a feature. First MySpace, then Facebook and more recently Twitter started to dominate and some of the niche [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] surprisingly like weeds were eventually weeded out, bolstering my argument that social networking was merely a feature. First MySpace, then Facebook and more recently Twitter started to dominate and some of the niche [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memetic Brand &#187; Memetic Naming: A Boy Named Sue - Johnny Cash</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Memetic Brand &#187; Memetic Naming: A Boy Named Sue - Johnny Cash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] comment below: &#8220;I think one person who has used his memetic name quite well is Om Malik, of GigaOm.com - the homonymic relation to ohm gives it a tech luster while keeping the sense of the personal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comment below: &#8220;I think one person who has used his memetic name quite well is Om Malik, of GigaOm.com &#8211; the homonymic relation to ohm gives it a tech luster while keeping the sense of the personal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memetic Naming: A Boy Named Sue - Johnny Cash &#171; Memetic Brand</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Memetic Naming: A Boy Named Sue - Johnny Cash &#171; Memetic Brand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] comment below: &#8220;I think one person who has used his memetic name quite well is Om Malik, of GigaOm.com - the homonymic relation to ohm gives it a tech luster while keeping the sense of the personal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comment below: &#8220;I think one person who has used his memetic name quite well is Om Malik, of GigaOm.com &#8211; the homonymic relation to ohm gives it a tech luster while keeping the sense of the personal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John-Scott Dixon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John-Scott Dixon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liz - what great work back in Jan. 2007 - I am sorry that I just found it. Anyway, I just completed a blog post on Social Media Taxonomy with a living spreadsheet featuring over 100 social media websites. I&#039;d be interested in your thoughts?

http://thoughtlava.typepad.com/mindflow/2008/08/social-network-taxonomy.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz &#8211; what great work back in Jan. 2007 &#8211; I am sorry that I just found it. Anyway, I just completed a blog post on Social Media Taxonomy with a living spreadsheet featuring over 100 social media websites. I&#8217;d be interested in your thoughts?</p>
<p><a href="http://thoughtlava.typepad.com/mindflow/2008/08/social-network-taxonomy.html" rel="nofollow">http://thoughtlava.typepad.com/mindflow/2008/08/social-network-taxonomy.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From social networks to social applications at Thingfo blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[From social networks to social applications at Thingfo blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] engaged communities, which means they can attract a higher amount of advertising dollars. (Liz came up with a taxonomy of social networks back in February 2007 that offers up an easy way to understand the nuances of the social networking [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] engaged communities, which means they can attract a higher amount of advertising dollars. (Liz came up with a taxonomy of social networks back in February 2007 that offers up an easy way to understand the nuances of the social networking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axle Davids</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Axle Davids]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent piece and comments! Getting stuff done seems integral to any business related SN. The challenge is where do people want to belong or just pass through.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent piece and comments! Getting stuff done seems integral to any business related SN. The challenge is where do people want to belong or just pass through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Networking Gets a Sanity Check - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Social Networking Gets a Sanity Check - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] engaged communities, which means they can attract a higher amount of advertising dollars. (Liz came up with a taxonomy of social networks back in February 2007 that offers up an easy way to understand the nuances of the social networking [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] engaged communities, which means they can attract a higher amount of advertising dollars. (Liz came up with a taxonomy of social networks back in February 2007 that offers up an easy way to understand the nuances of the social networking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Schroder</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill Schroder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yeah, Niche based social networking is huge right now.  How many can you count?  Which ones will survive.  There are two really important questions that come out of this though. What is the next big thing besides social networking and how many networks can a niche handle?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You know, flixster is not the only source for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filmcrave.com&quot; title=&quot;new movie reviews&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new movie reviews&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filmcrave.com&quot; title=&quot;movie lists&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;movie lists&lt;/a&gt;.  Just like the others you listed are not the only ones in that niche either.  One comes along, another improves the niche - thats what seems to be happening.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Niche based social networking is huge right now.  How many can you count?  Which ones will survive.  There are two really important questions that come out of this though. What is the next big thing besides social networking and how many networks can a niche handle?</p>
<p>You know, flixster is not the only source for <a href="http://www.filmcrave.com" title="new movie reviews" rel="nofollow">new movie reviews</a> and <a href="http://www.filmcrave.com" title="movie lists" rel="nofollow">movie lists</a>.  Just like the others you listed are not the only ones in that niche either.  One comes along, another improves the niche &#8211; thats what seems to be happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People, places, technology, and such &#187; Social Networking</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[People, places, technology, and such &#187; Social Networking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] of the media hype, and as much as some marketing gurus may like it, that social networks are not specific internet sites or features added to web [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the media hype, and as much as some marketing gurus may like it, that social networks are not specific internet sites or features added to web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave mcclure</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave mcclure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;great post liz... sorry i missed it earlier.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i&#039;d say you could collapse everything down to these 2 classifications:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;horizontal: targets a wide variety of features that pertain to a broad social networking demographic&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;vertical: targets a specific set of features that pertain to a niche-focused social networking demographic&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;there&#039;s probably room for more than one horizontal -- altho it might be an uphill climb if there&#039;s already a MySpace, Facebook, or LinkedIn for the broad demographic you&#039;re going after (and yes, i&#039;d still call LinkedIn a horizontal, rather than a niche vertical).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;however, i&#039;d agree the future is likely full of many, many vertical SNS plays that all rely on feature set highly integrated with the niche demographic &amp; their native activities.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;a possible 3rd category is a SNS tool that would provide visibility / integration across multiple SNS services -- if you believe a &quot;long tail&quot; of niche verticals will come into play, then such a service could be useful.  while i don&#039;t know if PeopleAggregator (or ProfileLinker, or UpScoop) are there yet, feels like something could be interesting there... hint, hint.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post liz&#8230; sorry i missed it earlier.</p>
<p>i&#8217;d say you could collapse everything down to these 2 classifications:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>horizontal: targets a wide variety of features that pertain to a broad social networking demographic</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>vertical: targets a specific set of features that pertain to a niche-focused social networking demographic</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>there&#8217;s probably room for more than one horizontal &#8212; altho it might be an uphill climb if there&#8217;s already a MySpace, Facebook, or LinkedIn for the broad demographic you&#8217;re going after (and yes, i&#8217;d still call LinkedIn a horizontal, rather than a niche vertical).</p>
<p>however, i&#8217;d agree the future is likely full of many, many vertical SNS plays that all rely on feature set highly integrated with the niche demographic &amp; their native activities.</p>
<p>a possible 3rd category is a SNS tool that would provide visibility / integration across multiple SNS services &#8212; if you believe a &#8220;long tail&#8221; of niche verticals will come into play, then such a service could be useful.  while i don&#8217;t know if PeopleAggregator (or ProfileLinker, or UpScoop) are there yet, feels like something could be interesting there&#8230; hint, hint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hans gieskes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hans gieskes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Interesting taxonomy. Can I add the term &quot;social Commerce?&quot; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People always try to leverage their social network for a purpose, ranging from finding a dog-sitter, a restaurant, a soul mate, a job or a job candidate. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the off-line world we believed &quot;it&#039;s not what you know but who you know!&quot; WIth the www our social networks have grown exponentially: I have 950 LinkedIn connections, and 167,500 people are only 2 degrees away from me. A lot of merely weak ties so to speak.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How do you extract &quot;strength from weak ties&quot;? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s all about social capital and who you ask to propagate your request for help. Ask an easy favor from a close friend and success is guaranteed - ask a complex question to bunch of mere acquaintances, and you may find that you do not have enough social capital with them to get your request evaluated and propagated.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Social commerce means adding a cash thank-you payment / reward to your request, and it&#039;s amazing how this can convert your social network   into a discriminating but motivated search party on your behalf.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;hans@h3.com&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting taxonomy. Can I add the term &#8220;social Commerce?&#8221; </p>
<p>People always try to leverage their social network for a purpose, ranging from finding a dog-sitter, a restaurant, a soul mate, a job or a job candidate. </p>
<p>In the off-line world we believed &#8220;it&#8217;s not what you know but who you know!&#8221; WIth the www our social networks have grown exponentially: I have 950 LinkedIn connections, and 167,500 people are only 2 degrees away from me. A lot of merely weak ties so to speak.</p>
<p>How do you extract &#8220;strength from weak ties&#8221;? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about social capital and who you ask to propagate your request for help. Ask an easy favor from a close friend and success is guaranteed &#8211; ask a complex question to bunch of mere acquaintances, and you may find that you do not have enough social capital with them to get your request evaluated and propagated.</p>
<p>Social commerce means adding a cash thank-you payment / reward to your request, and it&#8217;s amazing how this can convert your social network   into a discriminating but motivated search party on your behalf.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:hans@h3.com">hans@h3.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spentunygen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spentunygen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;zooped.com? that is that music MLM and it&#039;s an interesting play which combines everything except global warming as a feature&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;my take is the the &#039;intertia only&#039; networks like myspc and facebk are done; the concept of &#039;shared interest&#039; social networking is going to explode&#8230;lots of early entrants and it&#039;s about &#039;getting something done&#039; or &#039;facilitating&#039; something you do already but the SISN makes it &#039;easier&#039;&#8230;more convenient.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a morph of the &#039;news groups&#039; concept with silo search sites&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;$0.02&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zooped.com? that is that music MLM and it&#8217;s an interesting play which combines everything except global warming as a feature&#8230;</p>
<p>my take is the the &#8216;intertia only&#8217; networks like myspc and facebk are done; the concept of &#8216;shared interest&#8217; social networking is going to explode&#8230;lots of early entrants and it&#8217;s about &#8216;getting something done&#8217; or &#8216;facilitating&#8217; something you do already but the SISN makes it &#8216;easier&#8217;&#8230;more convenient.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a morph of the &#8216;news groups&#8217; concept with silo search sites&#8230;</p>
<p>$0.02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shazz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shazz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 03:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d also add &quot;commercial crowdsourcing&quot; sites like istockphoto.com &#8230; the forums/networks/social aspect of this commercial site is as important (and appealing to members) as it is in flickr.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shazz&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also add &#8220;commercial crowdsourcing&#8221; sites like istockphoto.com &#8230; the forums/networks/social aspect of this commercial site is as important (and appealing to members) as it is in flickr.</p>
<p>Shazz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Gannes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz Gannes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Doug K., I agree that those services can be social (similar to last.fm, except without a specific topic like music), but adding too many social features (discovering new friends, intra-network communication tools, profiles, etc) can get too distracting from the core function, don&#039;t you think?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug K., I agree that those services can be social (similar to last.fm, except without a specific topic like music), but adding too many social features (discovering new friends, intra-network communication tools, profiles, etc) can get too distracting from the core function, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug K.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/social-network-taxonomy/#comment-134796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think that you are missing one.  Community around Shared Services.  Think Del.icio.us or Meebo (although meebo could expand greatly on this idea).  I think there is great room for growth in this area.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that you are missing one.  Community around Shared Services.  Think Del.icio.us or Meebo (although meebo could expand greatly on this idea).  I think there is great room for growth in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

