<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Companies Shift Ad Budget from Print to Games, Online Worlds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/02/07/companies-shift-ad-budget-from-print-to-games-online-worlds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/07/companies-shift-ad-budget-from-print-to-games-online-worlds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:02:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xbox Video Games</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/07/companies-shift-ad-budget-from-print-to-games-online-worlds/#comment-134679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xbox Video Games]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigagamez.com/2007/02/07/companies-shift-ad-budget-from-print-to-games-online-worlds/#comment-134679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Xbox Video Games&lt;/strong&gt;

 p night note hail the original sonic game consoles this list
where s viva pi    ata you guys ter get there is not only i ll
share your opponents in the games in the ch]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Xbox Video Games</strong></p>
<p> p night note hail the original sonic game consoles this list<br />
where s viva pi    ata you guys ter get there is not only i ll<br />
share your opponents in the games in the ch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson Fish Market</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/07/companies-shift-ad-budget-from-print-to-games-online-worlds/#comment-134677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson Fish Market]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigagamez.com/2007/02/07/companies-shift-ad-budget-from-print-to-games-online-worlds/#comment-134677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;In a new study by the American Advertising Federation, nearly 90% of all American companies t... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;In a new study by the American Advertising Federation, nearly 90% of all American companies t&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon R.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/07/companies-shift-ad-budget-from-print-to-games-online-worlds/#comment-134678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigagamez.com/2007/02/07/companies-shift-ad-budget-from-print-to-games-online-worlds/#comment-134678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does everything have to be sold under the premise that it will support the thoretical sale of something else? Something must be making money, can we find out what it is and actually look at it? At what point do we go from subsidizing things we want cheaper to merely funding things that aren&#039;t actually good enough to sustain themselves?

In other words, are ads just becoming another kludge so that companies don&#039;t have to worry as much about providing a decent product?

I think time has already spoken. Those in print just don&#039;t want to listen.

Ok, so there&#039;s this new medium that allows information to spread faster. Great for time-sensitive and fast-moving stuff. So what do print mags do? Try to keep up with that, fail miserably, and blame the resulting lowered quality on everything but their inability to adapt. Bleed readers and respect, rinse, repeat.

Meanwhile, there&#039;s a huge gap in reference material on the industry. Stuff with information you&#039;d actually want to pull out every now and again. The collection of pertinent information that doesn&#039;t become more and more irrelivant with age. Magazines doing that? None that are particularly accessible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does everything have to be sold under the premise that it will support the thoretical sale of something else? Something must be making money, can we find out what it is and actually look at it? At what point do we go from subsidizing things we want cheaper to merely funding things that aren&#8217;t actually good enough to sustain themselves?</p>
<p>In other words, are ads just becoming another kludge so that companies don&#8217;t have to worry as much about providing a decent product?</p>
<p>I think time has already spoken. Those in print just don&#8217;t want to listen.</p>
<p>Ok, so there&#8217;s this new medium that allows information to spread faster. Great for time-sensitive and fast-moving stuff. So what do print mags do? Try to keep up with that, fail miserably, and blame the resulting lowered quality on everything but their inability to adapt. Bleed readers and respect, rinse, repeat.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, there&#8217;s a huge gap in reference material on the industry. Stuff with information you&#8217;d actually want to pull out every now and again. The collection of pertinent information that doesn&#8217;t become more and more irrelivant with age. Magazines doing that? None that are particularly accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon R.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/02/07/companies-shift-ad-budget-from-print-to-games-online-worlds/#comment-168652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigagamez.com/2007/02/07/companies-shift-ad-budget-from-print-to-games-online-worlds/#comment-168652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does everything have to be sold under the premise that it will support the thoretical sale of something else? Something must be making money, can we find out what it is and actually look at it? At what point do we go from subsidizing things we want cheaper to merely funding things that aren&#039;t actually good enough to sustain themselves?

In other words, are ads just becoming another kludge so that companies don&#039;t have to worry as much about providing a decent product?

I think time has already spoken. Those in print just don&#039;t want to listen.

Ok, so there&#039;s this new medium that allows information to spread faster. Great for time-sensitive and fast-moving stuff. So what do print mags do? Try to keep up with that, fail miserably, and blame the resulting lowered quality on everything but their inability to adapt. Bleed readers and respect, rinse, repeat.

Meanwhile, there&#039;s a huge gap in reference material on the industry. Stuff with information you&#039;d actually want to pull out every now and again. The collection of pertinent information that doesn&#039;t become more and more irrelivant with age. Magazines doing that? None that are particularly accessible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does everything have to be sold under the premise that it will support the thoretical sale of something else? Something must be making money, can we find out what it is and actually look at it? At what point do we go from subsidizing things we want cheaper to merely funding things that aren&#8217;t actually good enough to sustain themselves?</p>
<p>In other words, are ads just becoming another kludge so that companies don&#8217;t have to worry as much about providing a decent product?</p>
<p>I think time has already spoken. Those in print just don&#8217;t want to listen.</p>
<p>Ok, so there&#8217;s this new medium that allows information to spread faster. Great for time-sensitive and fast-moving stuff. So what do print mags do? Try to keep up with that, fail miserably, and blame the resulting lowered quality on everything but their inability to adapt. Bleed readers and respect, rinse, repeat.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, there&#8217;s a huge gap in reference material on the industry. Stuff with information you&#8217;d actually want to pull out every now and again. The collection of pertinent information that doesn&#8217;t become more and more irrelivant with age. Magazines doing that? None that are particularly accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

