“unethical & immoral”

“intensive purposes “

“No way an RLEC, ILEC, or whatever entity was routing traffic with a normal billing rate to AT&T, Sprint, etal. of $20K monthly goes to $2.2 million monthly.”

Wow.

First, you should get your money back from whatever law school you think you went to. What specifically makes this service “UNETHICAL & IMMORAL”? Are they killing baby pandas and selling their brains to illegal research facilities in Guam? Are they forcing people into the sex trade in the Virgin Islands? Does PUTTING IT IN ALL CAPS make it true? You have successfully and inadvertently given the perfect correct example of “begging the question” with your follow-up, “Surprise, surprise!”

Second, it’s not “intensive purposes” it’s “intents and purposes”. What the hell are “intensive purposes”??? You aren’t an expert if you don’t even know how to spell phrases you try to use to position yourself as an expert – it just makes you look dumb.

“Ask any auditor of the telco’s & they will tell you it is not illegal but they know that it is unethical & immoral and they are willing to go along with all of this because the telco doesn’t balk now when they are presented an exorbitant audit fee.”

Wow, did you hear that on the Drudge Report … or was it Dr. Phil? You’ve certainly got a craft ahead of you, weaving conspiracy and complacency as well as you do. Watch out Savage, another neocon is on the rise! Everyone (me!) says so, so it must be true! Ask any auditor!

Finally, AT&T’s having a large bill isn’t proof of anything other than they got stuck with a larger bill than expected – just like millions of AT&T’s customers. Couldn’t have happened to a nicer company.

No way an RLEC, ILEC, or whatever entity was routing traffic with a normal billing rate to AT&T, Sprint, etal. of $20K monthly goes to $2.2 million monthly. This is ridiculous & laughable and will be determined by the FCC for what is is, a billing scheme.

Ask any auditor of the telco’s & they will tell you it is not illegal but they know that it is unethical & immoral and they are willing to go along with all of this because the telco doesn’t balk now when they are presented an exorbitant audit fee.

They hae filed some doc’swith the FCC that have very good arguments.

Shame on the big telcos. When they were broken up by The US Department of Justice, their wires and any other networks really should have been nationalized. The US tax payer paid to subsidize them at every step of infrastructure building, while also paying their ever increasing call rates. Big Telco’s rates never came down even a penny fraction per minute unless new technologies were developed by third party startup telcos and entrepreneurs which expanded call carrying capacity of copper lines, or broadband circuits which Big Telco, except in 1982’s AT&T “breakup”, always managed to pay enough politicians through Washington and state lobbyists to continually monopolize. It took from 1974 to 1982 to accomplish this semblance of an anti-trust action.

The Far Future? If some day in the globalist future, citizens have become Borg like machine enhanced corporate entities, they could by virtue of parallel processing on the order of a SETI project, Matrix plug their collective hive consciousness into Big Telco’s (or some MegaCOM entity then) network system, supplanting it with their own scary Utopian nightmare society, and taking control until the fleshy part of them is completely excised. It would be ultimate justice for the elite servants of our global invisible master. He waits to collect their “souls” on a little flash memory keychain called Hell. Inventor Ray Kurzweil seems to think the time is not far off.

Then again, some guy probably in India is making a lot of money with the willing Assistance of an IA Telco.

What needs to happen is that the settlement fees should NOT be shared with a third party, rather remain between telcos. Any sharing with end users or customers should be considered abuse.