<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vonage&#8217;s 911 Bill: $500,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/30/vonages-911-bill-500000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/30/vonages-911-bill-500000/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Más problemas para Vonage &#124; Denken Über</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/30/vonages-911-bill-500000/#comment-84034</link>
		<dc:creator>Más problemas para Vonage &#124; Denken Über</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 04:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/vonages-911-bill-500000/#comment-84034</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] por el bajo desempeño de las mismas y su incapacidad (forzada por sus competidores) para dar acceso al 911 de emergencias via VoIP a todos sus clientes no bastase.. Vonage fue condenada a pagarle a Verizon una multa de USD58 [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] por el bajo desempeño de las mismas y su incapacidad (forzada por sus competidores) para dar acceso al 911 de emergencias via VoIP a todos sus clientes no bastase.. Vonage fue condenada a pagarle a Verizon una multa de USD58 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/30/vonages-911-bill-500000/#comment-84031</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/vonages-911-bill-500000/#comment-84031</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great!  Now I get to see yet another $1/month "tax and/or fee" on my Vonage bill.  Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great!  Now I get to see yet another $1/month &#8220;tax and/or fee&#8221; on my Vonage bill.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kapustka</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/30/vonages-911-bill-500000/#comment-84032</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kapustka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/vonages-911-bill-500000/#comment-84032</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed, just want to see how Vonage words the payments, which are fines by any other definition.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, just want to see how Vonage words the payments, which are fines by any other definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Dewey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/30/vonages-911-bill-500000/#comment-84033</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/vonages-911-bill-500000/#comment-84033</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't that how most standard lawsuit settlement legalese goes? When companies settle, it's so that they can avoid the cost of litigation and come out ahead by saying "we don't admit to doing anything wrong".&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that how most standard lawsuit settlement legalese goes? When companies settle, it&#8217;s so that they can avoid the cost of litigation and come out ahead by saying &#8220;we don&#8217;t admit to doing anything wrong&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
