<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DEMOing for Dollars in the Desert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3 years ago @arrington announces our partnership for TechCrunch20! &#171; My Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3 years ago @arrington announces our partnership for TechCrunch20! &#171; My Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] And there is a serious conflict of interest at the conference level. The economics of the event dictate that a certain number of startups must be accepted for a certain fee. Attendees don’t know if they’re really seeing the best startups, or just the best startups that are willing to pay the exorbitant participation fee. A few (or a lot of) duds always make their way in. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And there is a serious conflict of interest at the conference level. The economics of the event dictate that a certain number of startups must be accepted for a certain fee. Attendees don’t know if they’re really seeing the best startups, or just the best startups that are willing to pay the exorbitant participation fee. A few (or a lot of) duds always make their way in. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3 years ago @arrington announces our partnership for TechCrunch20! &#171; The Jason Calacanis Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3 years ago @arrington announces our partnership for TechCrunch20! &#171; The Jason Calacanis Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] And there is a serious conflict of interest at the conference level. The economics of the event dictate that a certain number of startups must be accepted for a certain fee. Attendees don’t know if they’re really seeing the best startups, or just the best startups that are willing to pay the exorbitant participation fee. A few (or a lot of) duds always make their way in. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And there is a serious conflict of interest at the conference level. The economics of the event dictate that a certain number of startups must be accepted for a certain fee. Attendees don’t know if they’re really seeing the best startups, or just the best startups that are willing to pay the exorbitant participation fee. A few (or a lot of) duds always make their way in. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Name, Still Same Game for Devicescape - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Name, Still Same Game for Devicescape - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] October 19, 2008 at 1:00 PM PT Comments (0)    Devicescape, a San Bruno, Calif.-company that launched at DEMO 2007 to mixed reviews, is rebranding itself and its Wi-Fi access software for mobile devices, including [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 19, 2008 at 1:00 PM PT Comments (0)    Devicescape, a San Bruno, Calif.-company that launched at DEMO 2007 to mixed reviews, is rebranding itself and its Wi-Fi access software for mobile devices, including [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; TechCrunch20カンファレンス開催のお知らせ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; TechCrunch20カンファレンス開催のお知らせ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] カンファレンス参加企業のレベルも金銭的利益と対立が深刻だ。要するにイベントの経済事情がすべてに優先するようになると、どうしてもスタートアップの一定数はある程度参加料を払ってくれる企業で固める必要が出てくる。だから参加者も自分たちが見てるのがベストなスタートアップなのか、それともただ単に破格の参加費を喜んで出したベストな（＝上客の）スタートアップに過ぎないのか、その辺の判断がつかない。こんな事情も手伝って毎回毎回しょうもない企業が数社は（というか何社も）混じってしまうのだ。 [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] カンファレンス参加企業のレベルも金銭的利益と対立が深刻だ。要するにイベントの経済事情がすべてに優先するようになると、どうしてもスタートアップの一定数はある程度参加料を払ってくれる企業で固める必要が出てくる。だから参加者も自分たちが見てるのがベストなスタートアップなのか、それともただ単に破格の参加費を喜んで出したベストな（＝上客の）スタートアップに過ぎないのか、その辺の判断がつかない。こんな事情も手伝って毎回毎回しょうもない企業が数社は（というか何社も）混じってしまうのだ。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vDemo Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Techcrunch20 creates free &#8216;DEMO&#8217; for start ups</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vDemo Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Techcrunch20 creates free &#8216;DEMO&#8217; for start ups]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] think its a great initiative compared to costly DEMO, but after looking at Mike&#8217;s own comments regarding his bias with Demo, I begin to see that [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think its a great initiative compared to costly DEMO, but after looking at Mike&#8217;s own comments regarding his bias with Demo, I begin to see that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; TechCrunch20 Now Live</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; TechCrunch20 Now Live]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the startup-sphere was all knee-deep in DEMO coverage last January, TechCrunch&#8217;s Mike Arrington and Sequoia Capital EIA and Weblogs Inc cofounder Jason [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the startup-sphere was all knee-deep in DEMO coverage last January, TechCrunch&#8217;s Mike Arrington and Sequoia Capital EIA and Weblogs Inc cofounder Jason [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrDoubt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DrDoubt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I like me.dium as well, something truly interesting after a long time.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like me.dium as well, something truly interesting after a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Morsa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Morsa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hmmm&#8230;thing is, the biggest breakthrough isn&#039;t another &quot;social&quot;&#8230;mobile&#8230;&quot;connector&quot;&#8230;video&#8230;or widget this or that&#8230;not Web 2.0 anything&#8230;and can&#039;t be found at any DEMO or other &quot;conferences&quot; or pitch-fests&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No&#8230;the biggest thing in 2007 is going to be paid match, a completely new form of &quot;keytraits not keywords&quot; advertising that will rock conventional advertising--including paid search (sorry Google)--to its very foundation&#8230; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#8230;and Anon&#8230;thanks for the offer&#8230;I&#039;ll take that wallet now :)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;thing is, the biggest breakthrough isn&#8217;t another &#8220;social&#8221;&#8230;mobile&#8230;&#8221;connector&#8221;&#8230;video&#8230;or widget this or that&#8230;not Web 2.0 anything&#8230;and can&#8217;t be found at any DEMO or other &#8220;conferences&#8221; or pitch-fests&#8230;</p>
<p>No&#8230;the biggest thing in 2007 is going to be paid match, a completely new form of &#8220;keytraits not keywords&#8221; advertising that will rock conventional advertising&#8211;including paid search (sorry Google)&#8211;to its very foundation&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230;and Anon&#8230;thanks for the offer&#8230;I&#8217;ll take that wallet now :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlstotts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mlstotts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Katie - you overlooked SFDC challenger Salesworks from Mission Research. Two interesting elements here - coming at Benioff&#039;s SaaS CRM co from below - and using a hybrid web/desktop platform that Zimbra and some other are beginning to find invaluable to providing QoS/reliability for folks who may not be running the biz of a T1 line. -m&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie &#8211; you overlooked SFDC challenger Salesworks from Mission Research. Two interesting elements here &#8211; coming at Benioff&#8217;s SaaS CRM co from below &#8211; and using a hybrid web/desktop platform that Zimbra and some other are beginning to find invaluable to providing QoS/reliability for folks who may not be running the biz of a T1 line. -m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeadCellZones.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeadCellZones.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/29/demo-2007/#comment-133292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s all about the land grab (get free customers) then figure out how to make money once you have them.  I would say Teleflip is the favorite.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about the land grab (get free customers) then figure out how to make money once you have them.  I would say Teleflip is the favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
