<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U-Verse, Line Losses Dog AT&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/#comment-133041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/#comment-133041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m getting ready to switch back to Comcast from U-verse. Clearly, the product is not ready for prime time. Also, to the individual who was impressed by the bandwith when recording 4 programs at once, you should know that the programs weren&#039;t being recorded locally. They simply spool the content at their data center and deliver is when you choose to view (as if it were an on-demand channel.)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting ready to switch back to Comcast from U-verse. Clearly, the product is not ready for prime time. Also, to the individual who was impressed by the bandwith when recording 4 programs at once, you should know that the programs weren&#8217;t being recorded locally. They simply spool the content at their data center and deliver is when you choose to view (as if it were an on-demand channel.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/#comment-133040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 20:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/#comment-133040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;We have had U-Verse for a couple weeks now and  I find it comparable to cable, Dish or DirectTV. We have not experienced any outages,  or serious dropouts. The audio and picture have been very good. Granted we do not have an HD set at this time, but we are viewing the standard signals on a 37 inch monitor which tends to show artifacts quite nicely. The quality of the picture far exceeds VHS and is on par or a little better than the signal from our Dish Satellite receiver. The audio is very good compared to  cable or satellite and is on par with DVD. The picture is actually brighter than the Dish receiver which I am guessing now may be attributed to the video output circuits in the boxes.  We have also taxed the system quite a bit pushing the limits as stated by recording 4 programs at once on the DVR even throwing in an HD stream to record to maximize the bandwidth usage with  all four programs recording without problems. The technology is still young, especially in the consumer market though I have been working with similar technology in the corporate market for some years so it is not completely untested though on this scale this may indeed be a first. Looking forward to the forthcoming features and hope the service only improves form here.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have had U-Verse for a couple weeks now and  I find it comparable to cable, Dish or DirectTV. We have not experienced any outages,  or serious dropouts. The audio and picture have been very good. Granted we do not have an HD set at this time, but we are viewing the standard signals on a 37 inch monitor which tends to show artifacts quite nicely. The quality of the picture far exceeds VHS and is on par or a little better than the signal from our Dish Satellite receiver. The audio is very good compared to  cable or satellite and is on par with DVD. The picture is actually brighter than the Dish receiver which I am guessing now may be attributed to the video output circuits in the boxes.  We have also taxed the system quite a bit pushing the limits as stated by recording 4 programs at once on the DVR even throwing in an HD stream to record to maximize the bandwidth usage with  all four programs recording without problems. The technology is still young, especially in the consumer market though I have been working with similar technology in the corporate market for some years so it is not completely untested though on this scale this may indeed be a first. Looking forward to the forthcoming features and hope the service only improves form here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Collins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/#comment-133039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/#comment-133039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Of course, their continuing battles with communities is not going to help speed rollout either&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;See more at http://www.geneva.il.us/att/Lightspeed.htm&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, their continuing battles with communities is not going to help speed rollout either&#8230;</p>
<p>See more at <a href="http://www.geneva.il.us/att/Lightspeed.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.geneva.il.us/att/Lightspeed.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/#comment-133037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/#comment-133037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;By the way, every time I see that new logo, I pour some out for Saul Bass. AT&amp;T committed a brutal murder of a brilliant design.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, every time I see that new logo, I pour some out for Saul Bass. AT&amp;T committed a brutal murder of a brilliant design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/#comment-133038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/u-verse-line-losses-dog-att/#comment-133038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I have the U-verse service. My impression: it&#039;s far from ready for prime time. When I signed up for the service, the agent&#039;s computer crashed twice. I had to give all my information--everything from the beginning--three times. When they came to install the service, it took--get this--10 hours! And my apartment complex is supposedly already set for U-verse. At one time, there were four AT&amp;T technicians huddled into my closet trying to work with the phone box. After the all-day install, my bill showed an installation charge of $220 (later reduced).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now that the service is setup, it&#039;s very flakey. HD channels are choppy. Standard channels have horrible audio. Some shows scheduled to record are never recorded. The box + dvr crash--a lot. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is no way they are ready to expand U-verse into new markets. They need to take this short-term revenue hit and make the service work.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the U-verse service. My impression: it&#8217;s far from ready for prime time. When I signed up for the service, the agent&#8217;s computer crashed twice. I had to give all my information&#8211;everything from the beginning&#8211;three times. When they came to install the service, it took&#8211;get this&#8211;10 hours! And my apartment complex is supposedly already set for U-verse. At one time, there were four AT&amp;T technicians huddled into my closet trying to work with the phone box. After the all-day install, my bill showed an installation charge of $220 (later reduced).</p>
<p>Now that the service is setup, it&#8217;s very flakey. HD channels are choppy. Standard channels have horrible audio. Some shows scheduled to record are never recorded. The box + dvr crash&#8211;a lot. </p>
<p>There is no way they are ready to expand U-verse into new markets. They need to take this short-term revenue hit and make the service work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
