<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digium, Fonality in &#8216;Free&#8217; IP PBX Fight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Hansen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-429451</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-429451</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As the CTO of a traditional PBX/KTS company, I am of course interested in where the Asterisk thing is going. In this industry, intellectual property has always been what adds value to a company. Specifically, unique features and architectures along with proprietary hardware (phones, line cards, etc.) protected by patents (open source community cringes). Trying to derrive reasonable revenue by reselling low cost PCs with &quot;free&quot; software (and maybe a cut of the SIP phone sales) seems to be a weak business plan at best. I am also curious why the &quot;hardened&quot; industrial versions of Asterisk (i.e. PBXtra) aren&#039;t open source as well. Surely these modifications fall under the GPL. Not to be too negative, kudos to Fonality for what looks like an excellent call control package (HUD).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the CTO of a traditional PBX/KTS company, I am of course interested in where the Asterisk thing is going. In this industry, intellectual property has always been what adds value to a company. Specifically, unique features and architectures along with proprietary hardware (phones, line cards, etc.) protected by patents (open source community cringes). Trying to derrive reasonable revenue by reselling low cost PCs with &#8220;free&#8221; software (and maybe a cut of the SIP phone sales) seems to be a weak business plan at best. I am also curious why the &#8220;hardened&#8221; industrial versions of Asterisk (i.e. PBXtra) aren&#8217;t open source as well. Surely these modifications fall under the GPL. Not to be too negative, kudos to Fonality for what looks like an excellent call control package (HUD).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K L Mukesh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82698</link>
		<dc:creator>K L Mukesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82698</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is the Asterisk PBX scalable?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Asterisk PBX scalable?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ferandez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82697</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ferandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82697</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fonality&#039;s model is not sustainable. One time charge of $1,000 and maybe a piece of the long distance (LD). The barrier to entry is very low. Proprietary technology is a must!
If Fonality is participating in the LD revenue -the question to ask is what would happen if that piece of the model went away.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said I think Fonality has done a very nice job coming up with a clean and easy to use GUI. However, the barrier to entry is some web developers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fonality&#8217;s model is not sustainable. One time charge of $1,000 and maybe a piece of the long distance (LD). The barrier to entry is very low. Proprietary technology is a must!
If Fonality is participating in the LD revenue -the question to ask is what would happen if that piece of the model went away.</p>

<p>That said I think Fonality has done a very nice job coming up with a clean and easy to use GUI. However, the barrier to entry is some web developers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Henderson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82696</link>
		<dc:creator>William Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82696</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Besides open source linux IP PBX software, there is now also Free Windows IP PBX software available from 3CX&#8230; A valid option for those not familiar with Linux.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides open source linux IP PBX software, there is now also Free Windows IP PBX software available from 3CX&#8230; A valid option for those not familiar with Linux.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82693</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82693</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oops, in my last post, there was an error and I should have stated:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;&#8230; especially in light Digium announcing their first appliance.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, in my last post, there was an error and I should have stated:</p>

<p>&#8220;&#8230; especially in light Digium announcing their first appliance.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82694</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82694</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Paul,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Asterisk also has also recently forked on the Mac OS X platform into what the forked group is calling OpenPBX -- interesting developments to watch especially in light Asterisk announcing their first appliance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>

<p>Asterisk also has also recently forked on the Mac OS X platform into what the forked group is calling OpenPBX &#8212; interesting developments to watch especially in light Asterisk announcing their first appliance.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux Guy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82695</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/fonality-digium/#comment-82695</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think Fonality has a great strategy. Supporting open source applications such as Trixbox in this way creates a stable and completely open environment for people to learn not only Asterisk, but Linux and web application development.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Fonality has a great strategy. Supporting open source applications such as Trixbox in this way creates a stable and completely open environment for people to learn not only Asterisk, but Linux and web application development.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
