2 Comments

Summary:

The recent rain of venture cash on Torrent-related start-ups and other P2P companies is a sign that the market is girding for a major showdown. Mark Cuban had once noted that the “conflicts between different clients might turn users off BitTorrent completely” and he makes a […]

The recent rain of venture cash on Torrent-related start-ups and other P2P companies is a sign that the market is girding for a major showdown. Mark Cuban had once noted that the “conflicts between different clients might turn users off BitTorrent completely” and he makes a good point. Traditionally the competition amongst Torrent clients was around features, but the main functionality was universal. The problem, as Janko Roettgers points out, is that now start-ups are using the protocol, and as a result there is a plethora of clients that are not interoperable, and are leading to what he describes as the balkanization of BitTorrent, “with clients fighting over filetype associations and vendors introducing one proprietary feature after another.” Continue reading

  1. Seems that if they screw up torrent too much something else will come along – it always does or people can just put out open source ones and not worry about companies writing crappy software.

    Share
  2. [...] or the commercialization of P2P, if you will. For example, Om Malik recently wrote a piece on the Balkanization of BitTorrent. However, one company stands out from the [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post