<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NetFlix Watch Now Reviewed.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/netflix-watch-now-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/netflix-watch-now-reviewed/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/netflix-watch-now-reviewed/#comment-82366</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/netflix-watch-now-reviewed/#comment-82366</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What I don't understand is why Comcast doesn't stream it's free on-demand content through its Comcast.net portal? I'm sure they will just as soon as they think of it -- just shows the disconnect between the TV and Internet arms of the behemoth. Why do companies fight being broken up, when it is clearly for their own good?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is why Comcast doesn&#8217;t stream it&#8217;s free on-demand content through its Comcast.net portal? I&#8217;m sure they will just as soon as they think of it &#8212; just shows the disconnect between the TV and Internet arms of the behemoth. Why do companies fight being broken up, when it is clearly for their own good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
