<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Ushers in Era of the Fluid UI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: freedomail</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-193881</link>
		<dc:creator>freedomail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-193881</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The people at Microsoft are so smart that they invented Zune right ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people at Microsoft are so smart that they invented Zune right ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The iPhone and the Mobile Internet &#171; Screenwerk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-176111</link>
		<dc:creator>The iPhone and the Mobile Internet &#171; Screenwerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-176111</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] lasting (at least for me) changes that iPhone will bring to the mobile market is simplification. Their new user interface is going to make complex mobile services relatively simple, and can have the same impact as [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lasting (at least for me) changes that iPhone will bring to the mobile market is simplification. Their new user interface is going to make complex mobile services relatively simple, and can have the same impact as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple is Overrated</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82460</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple is Overrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82460</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The only thing Apple is successful at is growing a whole army of loyal sheep followers of its brand. Steve Jobs is overrated, and Fluid UI is nothing more than rebranding by Apple, a branding not company, not a computer company! Itunes succeeded because the music industry shut out Bill Gates and Microsoft because of their fear of Bill; not because they had a better product. Itunes inherently built a monopoly conspired by the Music companies and Apple, not through natural market forces. This is in contention right now in Europe. Steve is opening up the ability to copy music across players because he realizes growth is stalling. Microsoft people are 10x smarter and will eventually take over this realm as free market busts the monopoly open.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing Apple is successful at is growing a whole army of loyal sheep followers of its brand. Steve Jobs is overrated, and Fluid UI is nothing more than rebranding by Apple, a branding not company, not a computer company! Itunes succeeded because the music industry shut out Bill Gates and Microsoft because of their fear of Bill; not because they had a better product. Itunes inherently built a monopoly conspired by the Music companies and Apple, not through natural market forces. This is in contention right now in Europe. Steve is opening up the ability to copy music across players because he realizes growth is stalling. Microsoft people are 10x smarter and will eventually take over this realm as free market busts the monopoly open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Top 5 Trends to Expect at CTIA</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82459</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; Top 5 Trends to Expect at CTIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82459</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] an actual appearance (or an update from AT&#38;T’s COO), but its presence will no doubt be felt on the UI front. We should expect more companies to showcase the fluid user interface and possibly some more shiny [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an actual appearance (or an update from AT&amp;T’s COO), but its presence will no doubt be felt on the UI front. We should expect more companies to showcase the fluid user interface and possibly some more shiny [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-01-22 &#124; mad dog in the fog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82458</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-01-22 &#124; mad dog in the fog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82458</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] GigaOM » Apple Ushers in Era of the Fluid UI The rise of the fluid user interface (tags: usability userexperience apple) [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOM » Apple Ushers in Era of the Fluid UI The rise of the fluid user interface (tags: usability userexperience apple) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Microsoft buying TellMe?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82457</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; Microsoft buying TellMe?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82457</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] giving it in-house expertise in a talk-to-your-phone user interface. It also would take an expected TellMe IPO off the table, while simultaneously embedding Microsoft software closer into telco operations who [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] giving it in-house expertise in a talk-to-your-phone user interface. It also would take an expected TellMe IPO off the table, while simultaneously embedding Microsoft software closer into telco operations who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prabhu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82456</link>
		<dc:creator>Prabhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82456</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Like Paul DiCristina, I am interested in more formal definition of Fluid UI. If there is any info in public domain on methodology or Architecture, that would be most welcome.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Paul DiCristina, I am interested in more formal definition of Fluid UI. If there is any info in public domain on methodology or Architecture, that would be most welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dedwarmo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82455</link>
		<dc:creator>Dedwarmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82455</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thymn Sinhell "I’m pretty sure fluid interfaces have been around prior to Max OS X … I disagree that apple ushered in the era of the fluid UI."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Macintosh 1984
Windows 1.0 1985
Windows 3.1 1992&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am interested in the history of fluid user interfaces and I'd love to hear about innovations from companies other than Apple.  Which user interfaces did you have in mind?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thymn Sinhell &#8220;I’m pretty sure fluid interfaces have been around prior to Max OS X … I disagree that apple ushered in the era of the fluid UI.&#8221;</p>
<p>Macintosh 1984<br />
Windows 1.0 1985<br />
Windows 3.1 1992</p>
<p>I am interested in the history of fluid user interfaces and I&#8217;d love to hear about innovations from companies other than Apple.  Which user interfaces did you have in mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul DiCristina</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82454</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul DiCristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;From the discussion so far it sounds as if "Fluid UI" is a UI methodology with well defined principles and techniques that all of the commenters are familiar with.  Can someone point me to a definition of this somewhere? Is the iPhone interface so different from what came before that it has defined a new UI methodology. If so, what are the hallmarks of "Fluid UI"?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the discussion so far it sounds as if &#8220;Fluid UI&#8221; is a UI methodology with well defined principles and techniques that all of the commenters are familiar with.  Can someone point me to a definition of this somewhere? Is the iPhone interface so different from what came before that it has defined a new UI methodology. If so, what are the hallmarks of &#8220;Fluid UI&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anona</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82439</link>
		<dc:creator>anona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 04:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82439</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;David: "But for people to claim that dialing a phone (or talking on a phone) is uniquely dangerous (as compared to driving activities which get a pass), well, that just isn’t logical."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I didn't say anything about dial&#38;drive being uniquely dangerous. It has been the cause of many fatalities and as a result it's uniquely, if you must, illegal. Neither is drink&#38;drive uniquely dangerous. Yet it's illegal as well. It's utter nonsense and height of irresponsibility to parse these words. You shouldn't drive and engage in distracting behavior, period. And we shouldn't be finding ourselves encouraging people to switch to keyboard-based phones because they are somehow easier to dial while driving. That's ridiculous.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: &#8220;But for people to claim that dialing a phone (or talking on a phone) is uniquely dangerous (as compared to driving activities which get a pass), well, that just isn’t logical.&#8221;</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say anything about dial&amp;drive being uniquely dangerous. It has been the cause of many fatalities and as a result it&#8217;s uniquely, if you must, illegal. Neither is drink&amp;drive uniquely dangerous. Yet it&#8217;s illegal as well. It&#8217;s utter nonsense and height of irresponsibility to parse these words. You shouldn&#8217;t drive and engage in distracting behavior, period. And we shouldn&#8217;t be finding ourselves encouraging people to switch to keyboard-based phones because they are somehow easier to dial while driving. That&#8217;s ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Lam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82438</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82438</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is an old concept among those who cover gear. But a fresh one on a business site. Good to see it covered here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an old concept among those who cover gear. But a fresh one on a business site. Good to see it covered here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Sieling</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82441</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sieling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82441</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all; long time reader, first time commenter here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think Om and Angus's observations about the fluid interface are spot on, and I hope we see more of this feel in Leopard. One thing I see is that these interfaces are also more tightly walled off from customization and adding your own content. I don't much lament the lack of customization, but in Front Row I always feel a little cut off from the rest of my stuff that I think belongs there, and unless I'm willing to hack it in or do hours of conversion processing, that's how it will remain to be. The streamlined flow works much better for grandparents and other neophytes, but sometimes leaves me wanting more. The iPhone has the same feeling, from the screenshots. Everything is very streamlined and smooth, but the apparent lack of expansion makes it feel kind of incomplete. This is the reality of appliance computing, though, and I think that's what Mr. Jobs was pointing towards with is Gretzky quote at the end of the keynote.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Speaking of the iPhone and whether it's innovative: this seems to be a real hot-word for people who don't think it's all that. The point of it is not whether the individual technologies in the iPhone have existed elsewhere. Instead, ask if you've seen select and pull together those technologies as well as Apple has done here. That is the innovation that they bring - selection and combination into a coherent and pleasant experience. I'd buy that for a dollar more than the competition; heck I'd buy it for a hundred dollars more.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all; long time reader, first time commenter here.</p>
<p>I think Om and Angus&#8217;s observations about the fluid interface are spot on, and I hope we see more of this feel in Leopard. One thing I see is that these interfaces are also more tightly walled off from customization and adding your own content. I don&#8217;t much lament the lack of customization, but in Front Row I always feel a little cut off from the rest of my stuff that I think belongs there, and unless I&#8217;m willing to hack it in or do hours of conversion processing, that&#8217;s how it will remain to be. The streamlined flow works much better for grandparents and other neophytes, but sometimes leaves me wanting more. The iPhone has the same feeling, from the screenshots. Everything is very streamlined and smooth, but the apparent lack of expansion makes it feel kind of incomplete. This is the reality of appliance computing, though, and I think that&#8217;s what Mr. Jobs was pointing towards with is Gretzky quote at the end of the keynote.</p>
<p>Speaking of the iPhone and whether it&#8217;s innovative: this seems to be a real hot-word for people who don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s all that. The point of it is not whether the individual technologies in the iPhone have existed elsewhere. Instead, ask if you&#8217;ve seen select and pull together those technologies as well as Apple has done here. That is the innovation that they bring - selection and combination into a coherent and pleasant experience. I&#8217;d buy that for a dollar more than the competition; heck I&#8217;d buy it for a hundred dollars more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Teece</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Teece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82446</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I use a Windows CE phone today.
It's a cingular 8125. I paid $400 for it and $85 a month. I have a 2 year contract.
It has a touch screen. But I have to use a stylus to dial.
I cannot dial it well when I'm driving.
DUH!
We are not supposed to.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Voice Dial my friend. Voice Dial.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I find it funny all these opinions over Apple's iPhone when I did not see any of the same on Microsoft's CE enabled Smart Phones that own the market now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use it all day.
I use it to schedule, plan, talk and surf the web when i need to.
I just got it last summer.
I was very excited by it when I got it.
But in the end I can't wait to get rid of it.
Steve was right, the killer app is the phone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Widgets will win too.
Stock, Weather, Maps are all I need on a daily basis on my phone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IM and Mail are huge too. But I get my mail over Google Web interface. It works well for me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Will the iPhone be perfect. Nope. Will it be multi generational like the ipod, yes. big difference is that we will be waiting two years in between each upgrade.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a Windows CE phone today.<br />
It&#8217;s a cingular 8125. I paid $400 for it and $85 a month. I have a 2 year contract.<br />
It has a touch screen. But I have to use a stylus to dial.<br />
I cannot dial it well when I&#8217;m driving.<br />
DUH!<br />
We are not supposed to.</p>
<p>Voice Dial my friend. Voice Dial.</p>
<p>I find it funny all these opinions over Apple&#8217;s iPhone when I did not see any of the same on Microsoft&#8217;s CE enabled Smart Phones that own the market now.</p>
<p>I use it all day.<br />
I use it to schedule, plan, talk and surf the web when i need to.<br />
I just got it last summer.<br />
I was very excited by it when I got it.<br />
But in the end I can&#8217;t wait to get rid of it.<br />
Steve was right, the killer app is the phone.</p>
<p>The Widgets will win too.<br />
Stock, Weather, Maps are all I need on a daily basis on my phone.</p>
<p>IM and Mail are huge too. But I get my mail over Google Web interface. It works well for me.</p>
<p>Will the iPhone be perfect. Nope. Will it be multi generational like the ipod, yes. big difference is that we will be waiting two years in between each upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rdas7</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82449</link>
		<dc:creator>rdas7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82449</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“dialing a touch screen phone when driving is kind of difficult”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You guys are missing the point. With synchronized addressbooks, you don't have to DIAL numbers anymore (or rarely). You will initiate calls with your contacts by touching their icon, or presumably shortcuts/gestures.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Speaking as somebody who has been using Addressbook/iSync for at least 5 years now (ever since the T68i), and now uses a 3G videophone, I can attest to the fact that as soon as you don't have to, you'll stop "dialing" numbers in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, most phones now have a recent caller list. To initiate a call with the people you speak to the most, it's usually a question of "d-pad down, down, center."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There's always a need for it (meet someone new, see a billboard, etc.) but these cases certainly do not occur frequently on curves at 60mph.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm sure the iPhone will include some shortcut or direct-dial feature. And I can guarantee it won't be pressing 8-1-1-5-5-5-2-3-4-5. It'll probably be along the lines of: see grid of "favorite" contacts' faces, tap contact. Or, swipe with two fingers means call boss, swipe with three fingers call home&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“dialing a touch screen phone when driving is kind of difficult”</p>
<p>You guys are missing the point. With synchronized addressbooks, you don&#8217;t have to DIAL numbers anymore (or rarely). You will initiate calls with your contacts by touching their icon, or presumably shortcuts/gestures.</p>
<p>Speaking as somebody who has been using Addressbook/iSync for at least 5 years now (ever since the T68i), and now uses a 3G videophone, I can attest to the fact that as soon as you don&#8217;t have to, you&#8217;ll stop &#8220;dialing&#8221; numbers in the first place.</p>
<p>For example, most phones now have a recent caller list. To initiate a call with the people you speak to the most, it&#8217;s usually a question of &#8220;d-pad down, down, center.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s always a need for it (meet someone new, see a billboard, etc.) but these cases certainly do not occur frequently on curves at 60mph.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the iPhone will include some shortcut or direct-dial feature. And I can guarantee it won&#8217;t be pressing 8-1-1-5-5-5-2-3-4-5. It&#8217;ll probably be along the lines of: see grid of &#8220;favorite&#8221; contacts&#8217; faces, tap contact. Or, swipe with two fingers means call boss, swipe with three fingers call home&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Experience Planner by Scott Weisbrod</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82448</link>
		<dc:creator>Experience Planner by Scott Weisbrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82448</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Weekly Linkage [01-19-07]&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quick Hits&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nokia - A View of the Future
Email Design Gallery
Let VA Fly!
Let&#8217;s define the word &#8220;pull&#8221; [Greg Verdino&#8217;s Marketing Blog]
Sharp LCD Supermarket Price Tags
The iPhone User Experience: A First Look [Ask Tog]
Apple Us&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Weekly Linkage [01-19-07]&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Quick Hits</p>
<p>Nokia - A View of the Future<br />
Email Design Gallery<br />
Let VA Fly!<br />
Let&#8217;s define the word &#8220;pull&#8221; [Greg Verdino&#8217;s Marketing Blog]<br />
Sharp LCD Supermarket Price Tags<br />
The iPhone User Experience: A First Look [Ask Tog]<br />
Apple Us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyc76</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82453</link>
		<dc:creator>tyc76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/18/apple-fluid-ui/#comment-82453</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;another side effect with the touch scrolling is that finally i will be able to scroll nicely my left hand. other smart phones is a no go for lefty like me, if i use the stylus to scroll (which the scrollbar is on the right) my hand would block the whole screen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another side effect with the touch scrolling is that finally i will be able to scroll nicely my left hand. other smart phones is a no go for lefty like me, if i use the stylus to scroll (which the scrollbar is on the right) my hand would block the whole screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
