Comments on: Brightcove Raises $59.5 million

By: Hedgehog Blogs » Blog Archive » Hedge Funds and Early Stage Venture Capital

Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:42:10 +0000

[...] the fact that hedge funds are increasingly showing up in later stage deals. As an example, see $60m Brightcove financing led by Maverick Capital.First, this is reminiscent of the late 1990s when the mezzanine market [...]

By: Anthony

Anthony — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:42:07 +0000

As everyone knows by now, video is very exciting. I think in the next few years people will discover that video is appropriate for certain areas of the consumer market, right now it seems like everyone wants to use video for everything. I think the small business arena will benefit the most from video which is pretty much the thesis behind Jippidy.com

By: JP

JP — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:05:46 +0000

I'd be interested in hearing any comments about how brightcove and maven networks compare in terms of technologies and business position (i.e., business model, likelihood of success, partnerships).

thanks, jp

By: Widgify » Blog Archive » Big Media vs. Brightcove

Widgify » Blog Archive » Big Media vs. Brightcove — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:16:11 +0000

[...] with their whopping $59.5M in venture backing, this still seemed like quite a bit to chew on. Now that the media folks have made it clear that [...]

By: carmen

carmen — Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:21:56 +0000

$81 million pumped into company that places broken flashboxes on sites, and maybe slicked on some nice admin interface behind the scenes. this is the knid of thing that techcrunch makes fun of - but i can only be simultaneously jealous/disgusted/angry

By: things.co.il

things.co.il — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:01:06 +0000

When will Bubble 2.0 burst?…

We are seeing the first signs of a bubble in the hi-tech industry, like in early 1999. These signs can be well seen in the vast amount of start up companies and the excellent job market. The over valued stock market of the previous bubble isn’t h…

By: gz

gz — Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:57:07 +0000

Don't think they should just pursue big media, but do think they need to hone in on more specific role in the online video ecosystem…too much money could give them the flexibility to continue to wear too many hats, which could allow the Joosts of the world to win critical specific segments. Blogged more over at NextBlitz as well.

By: Artashes

Artashes — Thu, 18 Jan 2007 06:02:23 +0000

Om, you couldn't have been more on target when you said they "should be focusing on the large media companies instead of chasing the YouTube type market opportunity. There is a lot more money in being an enabler, and makes them a lucrative take out target for one of the big boys like Arris or even Cisco."

I share your opinion 110%. Brightcove does what it does very well with better technology than YouTube. They should absolutely hold their flag up and build quality content partners. I think the fact that they raised $60M serves as direction and distance they are willing to go. Certainly a major head start financing-wise compared to the Venice Project (sorry, Joost now, is it?), Veoh, and other players.

As a side note, I should hire whoever is responsible for orchestrating the deal. If you are that person and you are reading this - I will double whatever you are getting now!!! smile

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:50:49 +0000

"Brightcove1, an online video platform and destination"

Please, that "Brihtcovel" link should point to the company web address, not to the "Brightcovel" tag.

By: AD

AD — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:45:48 +0000

As a vlogger, I wanted to chime in on the Brightcover platform. It's by no means the easiest thing to learn or to setup. But, the platform is so robust, and offers so much customization, that it was a no brainer to utilize their service.

I do have very many complaints about the service, as it requires way too many steps to upload and publish a video. If they have any hopes of capturing a wider market, they'll have to streamline this process.

They also seem to have required the content owners to convert their videos to a flash file prior to uploading. I guess this significantly reduces their server side activity and bandwidth usage, but this is a tedious task to require of the publisher - especially when all other video sharing websites provide this service instantaneously.

After the tedious learning curve and setup, things become easier to implement as you continue to add content to your account. But, I still find many steps combersome. I guess I can expect my patience during video uploads to thin over time as well.

But, after all these negative aspects, the player platform is uncomparable in the industry. Let's hope this $60mm goes to improving the publisher's experience and ease of usability.