<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BroadSoft to Partner With BEA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/16/bea-broadsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/16/bea-broadsoft/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: herman manfred</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/16/bea-broadsoft/#comment-132348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herman manfred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/16/bea-broadsoft/#comment-132348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think you&#039;ll find, on deeper looking, that none of those are IMS deployments but merely intent (at best).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AFAIK, NONE of the infrastructure companies - Lucent, Sonus, etc have ANY IMS equipment/software &quot;out there&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lots of lip service, of course, but that&#039;s not real (for example, Sonus touts its &quot;IMS ready&quot; items and one of their top guys even said the rough equivalent of &quot;will be IMS compatible with a small amount of programming&quot;! LOL!).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;None of this is surprising since IMS itself is, in general, still a moving target.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ll find, on deeper looking, that none of those are IMS deployments but merely intent (at best).</p>
<p>AFAIK, NONE of the infrastructure companies &#8211; Lucent, Sonus, etc have ANY IMS equipment/software &#8220;out there&#8221;.</p>
<p>Lots of lip service, of course, but that&#8217;s not real (for example, Sonus touts its &#8220;IMS ready&#8221; items and one of their top guys even said the rough equivalent of &#8220;will be IMS compatible with a small amount of programming&#8221;! LOL!).</p>
<p>None of this is surprising since IMS itself is, in general, still a moving target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajeev</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/16/bea-broadsoft/#comment-132347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rajeev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/16/bea-broadsoft/#comment-132347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The list includes&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Verizon&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Sprint &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;SBC, BLS, Cingular&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They had announced way back in 05  or 06 their IMS investments. And most of these were core infrastructure investments. Apparently there have been a steady flow of RFP/RFIs  from Lat-Am too. Even good ol&#039; Qwest is looking for a multi service network.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To the contrary, SIP servers and other app layer deployments  have been very few..and so far the likes of BEA/IBM/Ubiquity have been lagging behind Lucent/Ericsson. But with Round 2 coming, hosted telephony and managed services and all - it remains to be seen  who&#039;ll come out on top. And that is probably the single biggest factor driving all these partnership annuncements - case in point Ubiquity/Avaya, BEA/Broadsoft et al.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The list includes</p>
<ul>
<li>Verizon</li>
<li>Sprint </li>
<li>SBC, BLS, Cingular</li>
</ul>
<p>They had announced way back in 05  or 06 their IMS investments. And most of these were core infrastructure investments. Apparently there have been a steady flow of RFP/RFIs  from Lat-Am too. Even good ol&#8217; Qwest is looking for a multi service network.</p>
<p>To the contrary, SIP servers and other app layer deployments  have been very few..and so far the likes of BEA/IBM/Ubiquity have been lagging behind Lucent/Ericsson. But with Round 2 coming, hosted telephony and managed services and all &#8211; it remains to be seen  who&#8217;ll come out on top. And that is probably the single biggest factor driving all these partnership annuncements &#8211; case in point Ubiquity/Avaya, BEA/Broadsoft et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herman manfred</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/16/bea-broadsoft/#comment-132345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herman manfred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/16/bea-broadsoft/#comment-132345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;IMS &quot;deployments&quot; are all around the US? I find that essentially TOTALLY impossible to believe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Name one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;SIP deployment? Yes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IMS? Uh uh.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMS &#8220;deployments&#8221; are all around the US? I find that essentially TOTALLY impossible to believe.</p>
<p>Name one.</p>
<p>SIP deployment? Yes.</p>
<p>IMS? Uh uh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajeev</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/16/bea-broadsoft/#comment-132346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rajeev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 04:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/16/bea-broadsoft/#comment-132346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Interesting..IBM has also been pushing Broadsoft quite a bit on their Bladecenter platform - so with BEA with their fledgling WLCP tagging along its all in the family, eh? OTOH, your observation about IMS deployments being theory and no practice -  to the contrary, I see them all over the place for Tier-1, Tier-2 telcos in NA and Lat-Am. In fact, most of the &quot;bootstrap&quot; infrastructure deployments have been done..its going to be Round 2 soon. Probably that explains why the traditional IT vendors are coming together to put up a stronger fight against NEPs like Lucent.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting..IBM has also been pushing Broadsoft quite a bit on their Bladecenter platform &#8211; so with BEA with their fledgling WLCP tagging along its all in the family, eh? OTOH, your observation about IMS deployments being theory and no practice &#8211;  to the contrary, I see them all over the place for Tier-1, Tier-2 telcos in NA and Lat-Am. In fact, most of the &#8220;bootstrap&#8221; infrastructure deployments have been done..its going to be Round 2 soon. Probably that explains why the traditional IT vendors are coming together to put up a stronger fight against NEPs like Lucent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

