<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will dirty talk boost VoIP start-ups?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Like Jangl, TalkPlus Losing Its Voice As Well - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-877352</link>
		<dc:creator>Like Jangl, TalkPlus Losing Its Voice As Well - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 04:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-877352</guid>
		<description>[...] is not alone. We have heard from reliable sources that TalkPlus, San Mateo, Calif. Company is going nowhere fast. Michael Toepel, who was the CEO recently left, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is not alone. We have heard from reliable sources that TalkPlus, San Mateo, Calif. Company is going nowhere fast. Michael Toepel, who was the CEO recently left, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jajah, Jangl Team Up. No Not Like That &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-685393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jajah, Jangl Team Up. No Not Like That &#171; GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-685393</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Will dirty talk boost VoIP apps. Jangl Coverage Jajah Coverage&#62; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will dirty talk boost VoIP apps. Jangl Coverage Jajah Coverage&gt; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82097</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82097</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well there is another startup www.lets101.com which have taken the idea to next step! they allow you to search others and listen to their introduction directly on phone and connect to anyone with just a key press on dialpad (ofcourse without revealing your phone number)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;have a look at http://www.lets101.com/guest/faq#QLets101
to know more&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there is another startup <a href="http://www.lets101.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lets101.com</a> which have taken the idea to next step! they allow you to search others and listen to their introduction directly on phone and connect to anyone with just a key press on dialpad (ofcourse without revealing your phone number)</p>
<p>have a look at <a href="http://www.lets101.com/guest/faq#QLets101" rel="nofollow">http://www.lets101.com/guest/faq#QLets101</a><br />
to know more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82096</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82096</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another company in US also offers anonymous numbers for dating.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Read the full story here: http://voipguides.blogspot.com/2007/01/free-anyonmous-number-for-dating-from.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another company in US also offers anonymous numbers for dating.</p>
<p>Read the full story here: <a href="http://voipguides.blogspot.com/2007/01/free-anyonmous-number-for-dating-from.html" rel="nofollow">http://voipguides.blogspot.com/2007/01/free-anyonmous-number-for-dating-from.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Andrew Bell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82095</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Andrew Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82095</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Funnily enough, Om, it looks like SONY intends to repeat the same mistakes they failed to recognize in their VHS/Beta battle in the burgeoning BlueRay/HDDVD fray.  And the key battlefield is, as you earlier assessed, Pr()N.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;According to the Inquirer SONY is shunning the Adult biz from the Blu-Ray format.  That'll be a big Oops.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37021&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Ian.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funnily enough, Om, it looks like SONY intends to repeat the same mistakes they failed to recognize in their VHS/Beta battle in the burgeoning BlueRay/HDDVD fray.  And the key battlefield is, as you earlier assessed, Pr()N.  </p>
<p>According to the Inquirer SONY is shunning the Adult biz from the Blu-Ray format.  That&#8217;ll be a big Oops.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37021" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37021</a></p>
<p>-Ian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michelle</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82094</link>
		<dc:creator>michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82094</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;well, once you're on your shadowdate, if you don't like what you see, you could then employ the use of a mobile alibi (www.mobilealibi.com)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, once you&#8217;re on your shadowdate, if you don&#8217;t like what you see, you could then employ the use of a mobile alibi (www.mobilealibi.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toti Stefansson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82093</link>
		<dc:creator>Toti Stefansson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82093</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
What is the difference between keeping your identity private with a Shadow Number and blocking the Caller ID from your cell phone?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you block your caller ID the recipient doesn't get any caller information, which in many&#8230; uh&#8230; shadowy scenarios means that they don't answer. With the Shadow Number they do can use that to call you back.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
What is the difference between keeping your identity private with a Shadow Number and blocking the Caller ID from your cell phone?
</p></blockquote>
<p>If you block your caller ID the recipient doesn&#8217;t get any caller information, which in many&#8230; uh&#8230; shadowy scenarios means that they don&#8217;t answer. With the Shadow Number they do can use that to call you back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Levy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82092</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82092</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;What is the difference between keeping your
  identity private with a Shadow Number and
  blocking the caller ID from your cell phone?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The difference when using Shadow Number is that now you've involved a third party whom you have no knowledge about and no reason to trust. You've just signaled to some unknown intermediary that you have something to hide.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No thanks! Keep your Shadow Number, and I'll call in public any time I want to get jiggy-jiggy, there's more anonymity in a crowd than standing out like a sore thumb using this Shadow Number hack.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>What is the difference between keeping your<br />
  identity private with a Shadow Number and<br />
  blocking the caller ID from your cell phone?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The difference when using Shadow Number is that now you&#8217;ve involved a third party whom you have no knowledge about and no reason to trust. You&#8217;ve just signaled to some unknown intermediary that you have something to hide.</p>
<p>No thanks! Keep your Shadow Number, and I&#8217;ll call in public any time I want to get jiggy-jiggy, there&#8217;s more anonymity in a crowd than standing out like a sore thumb using this Shadow Number hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanti Purohit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82091</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanti Purohit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82091</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What is the difference between keeping your identity private with a Shadow Number and blocking the Caller ID from your cell phone?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the difference between keeping your identity private with a Shadow Number and blocking the Caller ID from your cell phone?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82088</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82088</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Who cares.  Privacy is privacy - whether it is a conversation or an email - I support anything that tries to be anonymity back to the web. I still say that the greatest threat to the web is the openness that companies like Google push and the Gen X crowd is pionneering.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A lot of people dont want to be tracked, listened to or publish their lives on the web.  I for one say great.  The conveinience of a site saying "Welcome Back Brian" is not without cost - and believe me, companies are not all "do no evil" as goog claims to be..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares.  Privacy is privacy - whether it is a conversation or an email - I support anything that tries to be anonymity back to the web. I still say that the greatest threat to the web is the openness that companies like Google push and the Gen X crowd is pionneering.  </p>
<p>A lot of people dont want to be tracked, listened to or publish their lives on the web.  I for one say great.  The conveinience of a site saying &#8220;Welcome Back Brian&#8221; is not without cost - and believe me, companies are not all &#8220;do no evil&#8221; as goog claims to be..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82089</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82089</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;"Many new technologies — like VHS and DVDs, and more recently Video over the Internet — owe no small part of their early success to adult entertainment&#8230;"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That statement is right on the money, Om.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many new technologies — like VHS and DVDs, and more recently Video over the Internet — owe no small part of their early success to adult entertainment&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>That statement is right on the money, Om.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82090</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82090</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think it means "private" from the government. TalkPlus is CALEA compliant so it can be made un-private very quickly once the government decides it wants to listen in.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it means &#8220;private&#8221; from the government. TalkPlus is CALEA compliant so it can be made un-private very quickly once the government decides it wants to listen in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Smythe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82087</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Smythe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82087</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If this communication is truly private there will be problems. With this technology all kinds of illegal activities (I won't list them here) can be hidden from view. I like the idea of a truly private conversation but so do the bad guys and you know what the government thinks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this communication is truly private there will be problems. With this technology all kinds of illegal activities (I won&#8217;t list them here) can be hidden from view. I like the idea of a truly private conversation but so do the bad guys and you know what the government thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Andrew Bell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82086</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Andrew Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/will-dirty-talk-boost-voip-start-ups/#comment-82086</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;More interesting and relevant than the VHS/DVD/PR0N analogy is the adult chat line industry, which is hugely profitable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The two big boys in that business are both Canadian:  Toronto's LavaLife, which is now owned by a hedge fund, and vancouver's Teligence, which is privately-held.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dirty talk and "hooking up" over the phone are major components of both of their businesses, and in the case of LavaLife which also has a web-based service, are major profit drivers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Teligence markets "Tango Personals" and "LiveLinks", while LavaLife markets "The Night Exchange" and "LavaLife by Phone".  Make a call to any of these and the thin veneer of dating and relationships quickly peels back to reveal that they're all about hooking up and talking dirty.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This makes those companies natural players, and partners, in this space.  Both have major infrastructural investments, though, so the Jangls and TalkPluses should be wary that their strategies are quite replicable and these guys will likely copy and/or integrate their services.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Ian.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More interesting and relevant than the VHS/DVD/PR0N analogy is the adult chat line industry, which is hugely profitable.</p>
<p>The two big boys in that business are both Canadian:  Toronto&#8217;s LavaLife, which is now owned by a hedge fund, and vancouver&#8217;s Teligence, which is privately-held.</p>
<p>Dirty talk and &#8220;hooking up&#8221; over the phone are major components of both of their businesses, and in the case of LavaLife which also has a web-based service, are major profit drivers.</p>
<p>Teligence markets &#8220;Tango Personals&#8221; and &#8220;LiveLinks&#8221;, while LavaLife markets &#8220;The Night Exchange&#8221; and &#8220;LavaLife by Phone&#8221;.  Make a call to any of these and the thin veneer of dating and relationships quickly peels back to reveal that they&#8217;re all about hooking up and talking dirty.</p>
<p>This makes those companies natural players, and partners, in this space.  Both have major infrastructural investments, though, so the Jangls and TalkPluses should be wary that their strategies are quite replicable and these guys will likely copy and/or integrate their services.</p>
<p>-Ian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
