<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selling AOL, one piece at a time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:46:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s AOL Stake Down By A Half? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s AOL Stake Down By A Half? - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] course, AOL has been selling off its parts for past few years and has raised close to around $3 billion including the $1 billion it [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, AOL has been selling off its parts for past few years and has raised close to around $3 billion including the $1 billion it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aircraft Guy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aircraft Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Maybe google will just buy them to get rid of them&#8230; Redirect aol.com to google.com.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe google will just buy them to get rid of them&#8230; Redirect aol.com to google.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: junaid</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[junaid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Well they must be doing something right to get those millions of users using their email, pictures, video, AIM and many other products .. the AOL time warner Merger was 7 years back &#8230; the company is still around, selling assets but buying strategic companies, transforming itself slowly &#8230; 2 years back there was no light at the end of the tunnel but lately it feels like they are doing something right &#8230; $0.02&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they must be doing something right to get those millions of users using their email, pictures, video, AIM and many other products .. the AOL time warner Merger was 7 years back &#8230; the company is still around, selling assets but buying strategic companies, transforming itself slowly &#8230; 2 years back there was no light at the end of the tunnel but lately it feels like they are doing something right &#8230; $0.02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aircraft Guy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aircraft Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yea, I heard that about AOL today. Also, they have anounced major layoffs within their magazines&#8230; Crazy&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I heard that about AOL today. Also, they have anounced major layoffs within their magazines&#8230; Crazy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi there, today AOL has announced the acquisition of Swedish TradeDoubler, european leader in performance based marketing. What do you think about it? Maybe they&#039;re changing their strategy, focusing more on the possible synergies between Advertising.com and TradeDoubler?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, today AOL has announced the acquisition of Swedish TradeDoubler, european leader in performance based marketing. What do you think about it? Maybe they&#8217;re changing their strategy, focusing more on the possible synergies between Advertising.com and TradeDoubler?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hmmm&#8230; now from the inside, it looked / looks a little bit different, and not everything fits together, just because it was a sale.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, they moved out of their Services of Australia, Hongkong, Japan, Brazil, Latin America etc. looong ago. Actually that started already somewhere in the 2001/2002 timeframe. And simply because it didn&#039;t make sense even at that time. They only had a handful of subscribers and were burning money, with no prospect to get these markets rollin&#039;. They simply came to late on each of these turfs to late.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now the sale of European Access businesses is something different. Here the market has dramatically shifted. The big incumbent telco&#039;s have started a price war, were only the big telco&#039;s can compete. The ISPs are leaving the playing field.
TW/AOL had the choice to do a heavy investment NOW ( actually better 2 years ago ) and BUY a telco. In each of these three markets.
Or sell the Access piece as long as they still get money for it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now the Google deal: This simply was, from my perspective, a deal to a) calm down Mr. Icahn, and b) get an idea of how AOL is valued in the market.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Callcenters? Well, when you move to free service AND don&#039;t provide Access anymore, you simply need MUCH less call centers, than before. Ever heard of the Google Call Centers? The Yahoo Call Centers? Me neither. Maybe they exist. But AOL still has Call Centers outside of the US. So I think this is a normal step, when you sell/stop the part of the business, which is responsible for 90% of your Call volume.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And the MusicNow! thing? Well, that deal is so small, I wouldn&#039;t even count this for a strategy hint.
And remember, that they additionally bought a lot of companies as well. Advertising.com, LightningCast, That Chat Platform ( Can&#039;t rememeber the name ), Wildseed, X-Drive and just today in the news some European Ad company they are bidding 900 Million US$ for.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My perspective is, that they indeed want to try the free, advertised-sponsored, model. I doubt, that this will work. So far only in the Video-Arena AOL is really excellent and people might want to go there. Apart of that I don&#039;t see yet anything appaling. But who knows? In a Web 2.0 World the next KillerApp YouTube might be just a day away.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; now from the inside, it looked / looks a little bit different, and not everything fits together, just because it was a sale.</p>
<p>So, they moved out of their Services of Australia, Hongkong, Japan, Brazil, Latin America etc. looong ago. Actually that started already somewhere in the 2001/2002 timeframe. And simply because it didn&#8217;t make sense even at that time. They only had a handful of subscribers and were burning money, with no prospect to get these markets rollin&#8217;. They simply came to late on each of these turfs to late.</p>
<p>Now the sale of European Access businesses is something different. Here the market has dramatically shifted. The big incumbent telco&#8217;s have started a price war, were only the big telco&#8217;s can compete. The ISPs are leaving the playing field.<br />
TW/AOL had the choice to do a heavy investment NOW ( actually better 2 years ago ) and BUY a telco. In each of these three markets.<br />
Or sell the Access piece as long as they still get money for it.</p>
<p>Now the Google deal: This simply was, from my perspective, a deal to a) calm down Mr. Icahn, and b) get an idea of how AOL is valued in the market.</p>
<p>The Callcenters? Well, when you move to free service AND don&#8217;t provide Access anymore, you simply need MUCH less call centers, than before. Ever heard of the Google Call Centers? The Yahoo Call Centers? Me neither. Maybe they exist. But AOL still has Call Centers outside of the US. So I think this is a normal step, when you sell/stop the part of the business, which is responsible for 90% of your Call volume.</p>
<p>And the MusicNow! thing? Well, that deal is so small, I wouldn&#8217;t even count this for a strategy hint.<br />
And remember, that they additionally bought a lot of companies as well. Advertising.com, LightningCast, That Chat Platform ( Can&#8217;t rememeber the name ), Wildseed, X-Drive and just today in the news some European Ad company they are bidding 900 Million US$ for.</p>
<p>My perspective is, that they indeed want to try the free, advertised-sponsored, model. I doubt, that this will work. So far only in the Video-Arena AOL is really excellent and people might want to go there. Apart of that I don&#8217;t see yet anything appaling. But who knows? In a Web 2.0 World the next KillerApp YouTube might be just a day away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Dixon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex Dixon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 04:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Sell it all while there is some interest. I have said for some time now, AOL is dying a slow death. Just get it over with. Yahoo would be the best candidate to buy it all, but then again, Google already has a piece. That could make for a ton of interesting squabbles. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rex&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sell it all while there is some interest. I have said for some time now, AOL is dying a slow death. Just get it over with. Yahoo would be the best candidate to buy it all, but then again, Google already has a piece. That could make for a ton of interesting squabbles. </p>
<p>Rex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree with the above poster that the 1 billion from Google likely has something to do with the upcoming interoperability of Gtalk and AIM.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gtalk needs more users and this is a way to get it.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the above poster that the 1 billion from Google likely has something to do with the upcoming interoperability of Gtalk and AIM.</p>
<p>Gtalk needs more users and this is a way to get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlickDealer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SlickDealer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Aol was around 206 AD?? Didnt know the state of Utah was declared back then either. Wow&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aol was around 206 AD?? Didnt know the state of Utah was declared back then either. Wow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/14/selling-aol-one-piece-at-a-time/#comment-132201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;hmm&#8230; there have been some rumors about interoperability between google talk and AIM, I wonder if &#039;interoperability&#039; is another word for &#039;sale&#039;?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm&#8230; there have been some rumors about interoperability between google talk and AIM, I wonder if &#8216;interoperability&#8217; is another word for &#8216;sale&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
