<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Ma Bell, Nowhere to Hide from the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/11/for-ma-bell-nowhere-to-hide-from-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/11/for-ma-bell-nowhere-to-hide-from-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hide Windows Free</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/11/for-ma-bell-nowhere-to-hide-from-the-internet/#comment-896735</link>
		<dc:creator>Hide Windows Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/for-ma-bell-nowhere-to-hide-from-the-internet/#comment-896735</guid>
		<description>Iphone is great, but will not do for Europe. The GPS feature is not as powerful as the ones in smart-phones. Good for web browsing and music though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iphone is great, but will not do for Europe. The GPS feature is not as powerful as the ones in smart-phones. Good for web browsing and music though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Smith</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/11/for-ma-bell-nowhere-to-hide-from-the-internet/#comment-81961</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/for-ma-bell-nowhere-to-hide-from-the-internet/#comment-81961</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;iPhone is available with Cingular ONLY!? And what if I am stuck under contract with a carrier OTHER than Cingular but still want a iPhone?
Well, the only solution I could fine was http://www.Cellswapper.com - they get you out of any cell phone contract!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPhone is available with Cingular ONLY!? And what if I am stuck under contract with a carrier OTHER than Cingular but still want a iPhone?<br />
Well, the only solution I could fine was  (<a href="http://www.Cellswapper.com" rel="nofollow">link</a>)  - they get you out of any cell phone contract!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/11/for-ma-bell-nowhere-to-hide-from-the-internet/#comment-81960</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/for-ma-bell-nowhere-to-hide-from-the-internet/#comment-81960</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I too like this piece although I think the iPhone comment does show a blindspot. The iPhone actually represents vertical integration, albeit small, by Cingular working closely with the world's best interface design company, Apple, on the terminal end. It might be a new model. Not dissimilar to what AT&#38;T has done with Microsoft on the IPTV end. In both cases, AT&#38;T/Cingular are bringing network-based features to the party (visual voicemail, QoS) to make the end service delivery more compelling, something a dumb Internet cannot do. This is perhaps why they are willing to let the net neutrality issue go -- in any case, this strikes me as the right way for a  network provider to add value and avoid becoming a bandwidth utility.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too like this piece although I think the iPhone comment does show a blindspot. The iPhone actually represents vertical integration, albeit small, by Cingular working closely with the world&#8217;s best interface design company, Apple, on the terminal end. It might be a new model. Not dissimilar to what AT&amp;T has done with Microsoft on the IPTV end. In both cases, AT&amp;T/Cingular are bringing network-based features to the party (visual voicemail, QoS) to make the end service delivery more compelling, something a dumb Internet cannot do. This is perhaps why they are willing to let the net neutrality issue go &#8212; in any case, this strikes me as the right way for a  network provider to add value and avoid becoming a bandwidth utility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/11/for-ma-bell-nowhere-to-hide-from-the-internet/#comment-81959</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/for-ma-bell-nowhere-to-hide-from-the-internet/#comment-81959</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like this piece. However, how is the iPhone an entirely new category of communications device? It is in the same category as a Windows Mobile smartphone -- smartphone. There is not a single thing you can do on the iPhone you can't do on a Windows Mobile. Hopefully you can do them better on the iPhone, but that remains to be seen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this piece. However, how is the iPhone an entirely new category of communications device? It is in the same category as a Windows Mobile smartphone &#8212; smartphone. There is not a single thing you can do on the iPhone you can&#8217;t do on a Windows Mobile. Hopefully you can do them better on the iPhone, but that remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
