<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco buys Ironport for $830 million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/04/cisco-buys-ironport-for-830-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/04/cisco-buys-ironport-for-830-million/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why did Cisco buy Jabber ? : naveenchandra.net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/04/cisco-buys-ironport-for-830-million/#comment-954283</link>
		<dc:creator>Why did Cisco buy Jabber ? : naveenchandra.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/04/cisco-buys-ironport-for-830-million/#comment-954283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] has made significant purchase off late which include Web Conferencing giant Webex, messaging security software maker IronPort, security software maker Securent, and email storage provider PostPath to target Microsoft [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has made significant purchase off late which include Web Conferencing giant Webex, messaging security software maker IronPort, security software maker Securent, and email storage provider PostPath to target Microsoft [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrDoubt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/04/cisco-buys-ironport-for-830-million/#comment-81048</link>
		<dc:creator>DrDoubt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/04/cisco-buys-ironport-for-830-million/#comment-81048</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can anyone post some links to understand how such companies are valued? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i read somewhere that one way is to calculate the price as a million per engineer. ironport has 407 ppl. so they paid 2 million per engineer?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone post some links to understand how such companies are valued? </p>

<p>i read somewhere that one way is to calculate the price as a million per engineer. ironport has 407 ppl. so they paid 2 million per engineer?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/04/cisco-buys-ironport-for-830-million/#comment-81047</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 02:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/04/cisco-buys-ironport-for-830-million/#comment-81047</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think state of anti-spam and anti spyware at the moment is just a never ending cat and mouse game, spyware and spam is getting more and more intellegent and this is probably something to look out for in 2007. Creative Spam and Spyware! .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cisco might have made a good short term buy but I dont see how they will be able to be at the forefront of this war on spam and spyware for the  long term. They should focus more on the network instead of whats going through it. Perhaps cisco is getting greedy ?.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think state of anti-spam and anti spyware at the moment is just a never ending cat and mouse game, spyware and spam is getting more and more intellegent and this is probably something to look out for in 2007. Creative Spam and Spyware! .</p>

<p>Cisco might have made a good short term buy but I dont see how they will be able to be at the forefront of this war on spam and spyware for the  long term. They should focus more on the network instead of whats going through it. Perhaps cisco is getting greedy ?.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abel Flint</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/04/cisco-buys-ironport-for-830-million/#comment-81042</link>
		<dc:creator>Abel Flint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/04/cisco-buys-ironport-for-830-million/#comment-81042</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whoever can deliver on the foremost anti-spamware will be in a very powerful position - it&#039;s only going to get worse until we all switch to IM communities!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If anyone is interested in helping develop a radical virtual company developing anti spyware and anti spam technology get in touch abelflint {at} yahoo {dot{ co {dot} uk&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever can deliver on the foremost anti-spamware will be in a very powerful position &#8211; it&#8217;s only going to get worse until we all switch to IM communities!</p>

<p>If anyone is interested in helping develop a radical virtual company developing anti spyware and anti spam technology get in touch abelflint {at} yahoo {dot{ co {dot} uk</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
