<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla Discloses 2005 Revenues: $53M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:32:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-131306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-131306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;@Desi Boy
They aren&#039;t required to disclose their profits, but I think it&#039;s good to know about it for the public, it&#039;s simply a matter of transparency.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Lenny
They haven&#039;t CPM - most revenues come from the search deals where they earn a portion of the clicked ads on Google&#039;s search page (or Yahoo&#039;s in Asian area, where Yahoo! is the default search engine).
But, given that they disclosed the revenues for 2005 at the beginning of 2007, don&#039;t expect the 2006-revenues to be disclosed very soon.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Desi Boy<br />
They aren&#8217;t required to disclose their profits, but I think it&#8217;s good to know about it for the public, it&#8217;s simply a matter of transparency.</p>
<p>@Lenny<br />
They haven&#8217;t CPM &#8211; most revenues come from the search deals where they earn a portion of the clicked ads on Google&#8217;s search page (or Yahoo&#8217;s in Asian area, where Yahoo! is the default search engine).<br />
But, given that they disclosed the revenues for 2005 at the beginning of 2007, don&#8217;t expect the 2006-revenues to be disclosed very soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-131305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lenny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-131305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think the browser side is a corporation now: http://www.mozilla.org/reorganization/
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/about/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can anybody direct me to their data usage and CPM? I can&#039;t wait to see what they are going to disclose for 2006!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the browser side is a corporation now: <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/reorganization/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.org/reorganization/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/about/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/about/</a></p>
<p>Can anybody direct me to their data usage and CPM? I can&#8217;t wait to see what they are going to disclose for 2006!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-131304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-131304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;That will be NOTHING Compared to 2006! and the estimated search figure for 05 have been out for quite a while.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That will be NOTHING Compared to 2006! and the estimated search figure for 05 have been out for quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Donor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-131303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donnie Donor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-131303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It would be nice of them to use their profits to repay their donors. A non-profit should remain non-profit - they can repay back the donations, and still keep enough money as &quot;reserve&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice of them to use their profits to repay their donors. A non-profit should remain non-profit &#8211; they can repay back the donations, and still keep enough money as &#8220;reserve&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desi Boy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-131302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desi Boy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-131302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;wow Google made their day ..but i don&#039;t understand why a non profit organization would hesitate in disclosing their profit? either way they are doing this for the common peoples good right? so what is the point if they hide it?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow Google made their day ..but i don&#8217;t understand why a non profit organization would hesitate in disclosing their profit? either way they are doing this for the common peoples good right? so what is the point if they hide it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
