<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla Discloses 2005 Revenues: $53M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-80814</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-80814</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Desi Boy
They aren't required to disclose their profits, but I think it's good to know about it for the public, it's simply a matter of transparency.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Lenny
They haven't CPM - most revenues come from the search deals where they earn a portion of the clicked ads on Google's search page (or Yahoo's in Asian area, where Yahoo! is the default search engine).
But, given that they disclosed the revenues for 2005 at the beginning of 2007, don't expect the 2006-revenues to be disclosed very soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Desi Boy<br />
They aren&#8217;t required to disclose their profits, but I think it&#8217;s good to know about it for the public, it&#8217;s simply a matter of transparency.</p>
<p>@Lenny<br />
They haven&#8217;t CPM - most revenues come from the search deals where they earn a portion of the clicked ads on Google&#8217;s search page (or Yahoo&#8217;s in Asian area, where Yahoo! is the default search engine).<br />
But, given that they disclosed the revenues for 2005 at the beginning of 2007, don&#8217;t expect the 2006-revenues to be disclosed very soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-80812</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-80812</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the browser side is a corporation now: http://www.mozilla.org/reorganization/
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/about/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can anybody direct me to their data usage and CPM? I can't wait to see what they are going to disclose for 2006!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the browser side is a corporation now:  (<a href="http://www.mozilla.org/reorganization/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) <br />
 (<a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/about/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
<p>Can anybody direct me to their data usage and CPM? I can&#8217;t wait to see what they are going to disclose for 2006!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-80810</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-80810</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That will be NOTHING Compared to 2006! and the estimated search figure for 05 have been out for quite a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That will be NOTHING Compared to 2006! and the estimated search figure for 05 have been out for quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Donor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-80809</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Donor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-80809</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It would be nice of them to use their profits to repay their donors. A non-profit should remain non-profit - they can repay back the donations, and still keep enough money as "reserve".&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice of them to use their profits to repay their donors. A non-profit should remain non-profit - they can repay back the donations, and still keep enough money as &#8220;reserve&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desi Boy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-80808</link>
		<dc:creator>Desi Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/mozilla-discloses-2005-revenues-53m/#comment-80808</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;wow Google made their day ..but i don't understand why a non profit organization would hesitate in disclosing their profit? either way they are doing this for the common peoples good right? so what is the point if they hide it?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow Google made their day ..but i don&#8217;t understand why a non profit organization would hesitate in disclosing their profit? either way they are doing this for the common peoples good right? so what is the point if they hide it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
