<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will there be UWB in 2007?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/12/29/uwb-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/29/uwb-2007/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UWB News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/29/uwb-2007/#comment-131087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UWB News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/29/uwb-2007/#comment-131087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;for your web-research about Wireless USB and Ultra Wideband you can visit my Blog. It gives detailed informations and news about fabless semiconductor companies that are developing ultrawideband silicon, software and reference design solutions for wireless USB devices. Visit us and get caught up with the wireless USB scene.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for your web-research about Wireless USB and Ultra Wideband you can visit my Blog. It gives detailed informations and news about fabless semiconductor companies that are developing ultrawideband silicon, software and reference design solutions for wireless USB devices. Visit us and get caught up with the wireless USB scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Khosla Funds UWB Startup Artimi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/29/uwb-2007/#comment-131086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; Khosla Funds UWB Startup Artimi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/29/uwb-2007/#comment-131086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] years of market hype cycles pumping up the short range wireless technology UWB, investors are still interested. UWB chip [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] years of market hype cycles pumping up the short range wireless technology UWB, investors are still interested. UWB chip [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fleishman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/29/uwb-2007/#comment-131085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Fleishman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/29/uwb-2007/#comment-131085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The silent partner here - not mentioned in this great round-up - is Intel. If Intel carries through as I believe they will and integrates UWB as a standard feature on its reference designs for laptops and desktops, then UWB will take off. UWB cannot succeed as a dongle/add-on/hub technology. The entire point of the WiMedia Alliance is to develop protocols that will run on a single radio, with that radio designed to be integral to a device (whether peripheral, handheld, or computer).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have been talking to many UWB chipmakers over the last couple of months, and I no longer worry that UWB devices will reach the marketplace. But it seems likely that integration and full utility with multiple useful standards working on a single radio won&#039;t happen until mid-2007 or later.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The silent partner here &#8211; not mentioned in this great round-up &#8211; is Intel. If Intel carries through as I believe they will and integrates UWB as a standard feature on its reference designs for laptops and desktops, then UWB will take off. UWB cannot succeed as a dongle/add-on/hub technology. The entire point of the WiMedia Alliance is to develop protocols that will run on a single radio, with that radio designed to be integral to a device (whether peripheral, handheld, or computer).</p>
<p>I have been talking to many UWB chipmakers over the last couple of months, and I no longer worry that UWB devices will reach the marketplace. But it seems likely that integration and full utility with multiple useful standards working on a single radio won&#8217;t happen until mid-2007 or later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dascud</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/29/uwb-2007/#comment-131084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dascud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/29/uwb-2007/#comment-131084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It is really suprising that Freescale after duking it out with the MBOA group at the standards body is leaving the table after a hard fought stalemate. I have been following the 802.15.3a WG for a while now and its good to see some UWB products emerging although they are a year late. Although a UWB proponent, I seriously doubt that wireless USB is going to be mass adopted unless future desktops/Laptops  come built in with wirelss UWB ports and USB devices also incorporate a UWB chipset.  Sure its a little convenient, but with current wireless USB hubs I still need to run cables from my USB devices to the hub. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tzero is mostly targetting wireless HD and the Gefen HDDMI switch is based on their chipset. Wonder how long before they change focus considering the big CE manufacturers (Sony, panasonic) etc have formed a WirelessHD forum for exactly the same purpose although its in the 60Ghz band. http://www.wirelesshd.org&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Suprisingly, none of the chipset manufs are talking about any IP
solutions.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really suprising that Freescale after duking it out with the MBOA group at the standards body is leaving the table after a hard fought stalemate. I have been following the 802.15.3a WG for a while now and its good to see some UWB products emerging although they are a year late. Although a UWB proponent, I seriously doubt that wireless USB is going to be mass adopted unless future desktops/Laptops  come built in with wirelss UWB ports and USB devices also incorporate a UWB chipset.  Sure its a little convenient, but with current wireless USB hubs I still need to run cables from my USB devices to the hub. </p>
<p>Tzero is mostly targetting wireless HD and the Gefen HDDMI switch is based on their chipset. Wonder how long before they change focus considering the big CE manufacturers (Sony, panasonic) etc have formed a WirelessHD forum for exactly the same purpose although its in the 60Ghz band. <a href="http://www.wirelesshd.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.wirelesshd.org</a></p>
<p>Suprisingly, none of the chipset manufs are talking about any IP<br />
solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

