Comments on: Updated: Neuronet, a special network for virtual worlds http://gigaom.com/2006/12/29/neuronet-a-special-network-for-virtual-worlds/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:02:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Nascence http://gigaom.com/2006/12/29/neuronet-a-special-network-for-virtual-worlds/#comment-131105 Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:24:45 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/29/neuronet-a-special-network-for-virtual-worlds/#comment-131105 Come on, don’t be so pessimistic =(
Yes, it probably will be profitable but 2-3 years until consumers can get in on the action is really something to look forward to

]]> By: HawkEye http://gigaom.com/2006/12/29/neuronet-a-special-network-for-virtual-worlds/#comment-131104 Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:38:44 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/29/neuronet-a-special-network-for-virtual-worlds/#comment-131104 I still didn’t quite get what is the technical necessity for a new network? Will neuronet be based on some other protocol beside tcp/ip? Why cannot multi billion zillion of jumbo tcp/ip frames not be able to carry VR frames? What about the comcast cable that I have? Why can’t it deliver cinematic quality games? What about the headgear. Without a device that is equivalent to surround vision (like surround sound) how can a game be a VR?

Looks to me it is a money making scam by selling domain name registrations with .vr in the end .

HA HA HA HA HA!!!! HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!

]]>