Comments on: Google Explains Wack Zeitgest Criteria http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/ Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: renaissance chambara | Ged Carroll - Day of the Google http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-861243 renaissance chambara | Ged Carroll - Day of the Google Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:27:56 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-861243 <p>[...] that Google’s Zeitgeist is not the most frequently searched terms over a period. Bloggers like GigaOM were bending themselves out of [...]</p> [...] that Google’s Zeitgeist is not the most frequently searched terms over a period. Bloggers like GigaOM were bending themselves out of [...]

]]> By: For the record | LINGO 07 / II : Suchwörter | Wunsch ( w ) Orte | popular search terms at in|ad|ae|qu|at http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-834653 For the record | LINGO 07 / II : Suchwörter | Wunsch ( w ) Orte | popular search terms at in|ad|ae|qu|at Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:02:52 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-834653 <p>[...] längerem Suchen fanden wir @ Giga Omni Media ( gigaom ) einen Blogkommentar zum Google- Year- End Zeitgeist 2006 , welcher auf die - freundlich formuliert - “Relaitivität” des angeblich “most [...]</p> [...] längerem Suchen fanden wir @ Giga Omni Media ( gigaom ) einen Blogkommentar zum Google- Year- End Zeitgeist 2006 , welcher auf die – freundlich formuliert – “Relaitivität” des angeblich “most [...]

]]> By: Google’s Year End Zeitgeist » Webomatica - Technology and Entertainment Digest http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-566835 Google’s Year End Zeitgeist » Webomatica - Technology and Entertainment Digest Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:28:03 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-566835 <p>[...] These searches aren’t the necessarily the most popular - just the most interesting of the [...]</p> [...] These searches aren’t the necessarily the most popular – just the most interesting of the [...]

]]> By: toni http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-80379 toni Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:27:52 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-80379 <p>The "Don't Be Evil" company is now facing extraordinary sensitive people. People who are not so merciful again like what how it was within the birth era of Google, or so what I've read :)</p> <p>Is it because Google hasn't give us new toys lately? No X-Mast present for the googlers? </p> <p>Shame on …</p> The “Don’t Be Evil” company is now facing extraordinary sensitive people. People who are not so merciful again like what how it was within the birth era of Google, or so what I’ve read :)

Is it because Google hasn’t give us new toys lately? No X-Mast present for the googlers?

Shame on …

]]> By: Apogee Weblog http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-80377 Apogee Weblog Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:42:18 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-80377 <p><strong>Google Zeitgeist and Yahoo Buzz Index Click Fraud…</strong></p> <p>There is quite a fuss about the year end Google Zeitgeist. The basic objection seems to be that the searches highlighted are not really the popular searches from 2006. Whatever. It…</p> Google Zeitgeist and Yahoo Buzz Index Click Fraud…

There is quite a fuss about the year end Google Zeitgeist. The basic objection seems to be that the searches highlighted are not really the popular searches from 2006. Whatever. It…

]]> By: Bebo Owners http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-80375 Bebo Owners Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:26:22 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-80375 <p>Damn! Now you ruined our future sale to Google!</p> Damn! Now you ruined our future sale to Google!

]]> By: Allen Stern http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-80373 Allen Stern Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:08:26 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-80373 <p>I call a WTF on this. Shame.</p> I call a WTF on this. Shame.

]]> By: Amit Patel http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-80371 Amit Patel Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:02:32 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-80371 <blockquote> <p>C’mon, Google, people would be better served by accuracy and transparency</p> </blockquote> <p>From Google? The masters of smoke and mirrors? Ya, right…</p> <p>See: http://www.idcide.com/affair/</p>

C’mon, Google, people would be better served by accuracy and transparency

From Google? The masters of smoke and mirrors? Ya, right…

See: http://www.idcide.com/affair/

]]>