Comments on: Google Explains Wack Zeitgest Criteria http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:16:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Year-End Search Lists: Data Porn Based on Flimsy Science – GigaOM http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131081 Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:07:28 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131081 [...] timed year-end search-term roundups: Michael Jackson was tops in 2009. But as we’ve been griping for years now, these lists are mostly useless and misinterpreted; Google doesn’t even give [...]

]]> By: renaissance chambara | Ged Carroll - Day of the Google http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131080 Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:27:56 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131080 [...] that Google’s Zeitgeist is not the most frequently searched terms over a period. Bloggers like GigaOM were bending themselves out of [...]

]]> By: For the record | LINGO 07 / II : Suchwörter | Wunsch ( w ) Orte | popular search terms at in|ad|ae|qu|at http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131079 Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:02:52 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131079 [...] längerem Suchen fanden wir @ Giga Omni Media ( gigaom ) einen Blogkommentar zum Google- Year- End Zeitgeist 2006 , welcher auf die – freundlich formuliert – “Relaitivität” des angeblich “most [...]

]]> By: Google’s Year End Zeitgeist » Webomatica - Technology and Entertainment Digest http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131078 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:28:03 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131078 [...] These searches aren’t the necessarily the most popular – just the most interesting of the [...]

]]> By: toni http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131077 Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:27:52 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131077 The “Don’t Be Evil” company is now facing extraordinary sensitive people. People who are not so merciful again like what how it was within the birth era of Google, or so what I’ve read :)

Is it because Google hasn’t give us new toys lately? No X-Mast present for the googlers?

Shame on …

]]> By: Apogee Weblog http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131076 Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:42:18 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131076 Google Zeitgeist and Yahoo Buzz Index Click Fraud…

There is quite a fuss about the year end Google Zeitgeist. The basic objection seems to be that the searches highlighted are not really the popular searches from 2006. Whatever. It…

]]> By: Bebo Owners http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131075 Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:26:22 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131075 Damn! Now you ruined our future sale to Google!

]]> By: Allen Stern http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131074 Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:08:26 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131074 I call a WTF on this. Shame.

]]> By: Amit Patel http://gigaom.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131073 Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:02:32 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/google-explains-wack-zeitgest-criteria/#comment-131073

C’mon, Google, people would be better served by accuracy and transparency

From Google?
The masters of smoke and mirrors?
Ya, right…

See: http://www.idcide.com/affair/

]]>