<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon Leading AT&amp;T on IPTV&#8230;for now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/12/26/verizon-leading-att-on-iptvfor-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/26/verizon-leading-att-on-iptvfor-now/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: obert iptv kim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/26/verizon-leading-att-on-iptvfor-now/#comment-79813</link>
		<dc:creator>obert iptv kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/verizon-leading-att-on-iptvfor-now/#comment-79813</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OM, what are the chances that Google and Intel / Samsung will deploy a major wimax net and trump the cell carriers&#039; iptv efforts?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OM, what are the chances that Google and Intel / Samsung will deploy a major wimax net and trump the cell carriers&#8217; iptv efforts?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Lide</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/26/verizon-leading-att-on-iptvfor-now/#comment-79811</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Lide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/verizon-leading-att-on-iptvfor-now/#comment-79811</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om, if i&#039;m not mistaken, Verizon isn&#039;t using IP to deliver FiOS video in most places (if any).  Despite the &quot;IPTV&quot; marketing push, I think they&#039;re using conventional cable protocols.  I could be wrong - I just poked around a bit to see if I could confirm that hypothesis but couldn&#039;t find anything immediately.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not sure it changes the gist of your piece, but assuming i&#039;m correct, the headline is misleading.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, if i&#8217;m not mistaken, Verizon isn&#8217;t using IP to deliver FiOS video in most places (if any).  Despite the &#8220;IPTV&#8221; marketing push, I think they&#8217;re using conventional cable protocols.  I could be wrong &#8211; I just poked around a bit to see if I could confirm that hypothesis but couldn&#8217;t find anything immediately.</p>

<p>Not sure it changes the gist of your piece, but assuming i&#8217;m correct, the headline is misleading.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/26/verizon-leading-att-on-iptvfor-now/#comment-79809</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 17:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/verizon-leading-att-on-iptvfor-now/#comment-79809</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Amen to that DAG. I think any company which is willing to bet their future on an unproven platform from Microsoft should be prepared for the consequences.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that DAG. I think any company which is willing to bet their future on an unproven platform from Microsoft should be prepared for the consequences.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/26/verizon-leading-att-on-iptvfor-now/#comment-79807</link>
		<dc:creator>DAG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 17:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/verizon-leading-att-on-iptvfor-now/#comment-79807</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;SBC (masquerading as AT&amp;T) is a company aggressively dedicated to squeezing the absolute most money for the absolute least quality with minimal oversight, competition or regulation. I&#039;m no fan of Verizon, but this makes me smile- at least they are willing to do the right thing on the technical side.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SBC (masquerading as AT&amp;T) is a company aggressively dedicated to squeezing the absolute most money for the absolute least quality with minimal oversight, competition or regulation. I&#8217;m no fan of Verizon, but this makes me smile- at least they are willing to do the right thing on the technical side.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
