<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double Fusion Receives New Round of Venture Capital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/12/19/double-fusion-receives-new-round-of-venture-capital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/19/double-fusion-receives-new-round-of-venture-capital/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohammad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/19/double-fusion-receives-new-round-of-venture-capital/#comment-130311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigagamez.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/double-fusion-receives-new-round-of-venture-capital/#comment-130311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Sports and racing games have always had ads in them. I wonder if Google is looking at this area too. We might even see free downloadable games that are 100% ad driven (The number of players has to be high enough for this to make sense though).&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sports and racing games have always had ads in them. I wonder if Google is looking at this area too. We might even see free downloadable games that are 100% ad driven (The number of players has to be high enough for this to make sense though).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-train</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/19/double-fusion-receives-new-round-of-venture-capital/#comment-130310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e-train]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigagamez.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/double-fusion-receives-new-round-of-venture-capital/#comment-130310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;What kind of valuation does this imply?  Either Double Fusion is valued at 100+ million now (with no real product in the marketplace) or it was a huge down round for them&#8230;I&#039;m guessing the latter and would estimate a $50 million post money valuation (at best).  I&#039;d be interested to hear what others think&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of valuation does this imply?  Either Double Fusion is valued at 100+ million now (with no real product in the marketplace) or it was a huge down round for them&#8230;I&#8217;m guessing the latter and would estimate a $50 million post money valuation (at best).  I&#8217;d be interested to hear what others think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

