<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mojungle: Five Easy Pieces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ophir Tanz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophir Tanz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sorry to see this sort of negative speculation.  I do see how things can look questionable from an outside perspective.  I can assure you that all of our statements have been accurate and the decision to pull the listing was a result of interest that exceeded our [already bullish] expectations.  I suppose only the ultimate sale of the platform(s)
will show this to be the case.  We&#039;ll keep you posted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Best,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ophir&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry to see this sort of negative speculation.  I do see how things can look questionable from an outside perspective.  I can assure you that all of our statements have been accurate and the decision to pull the listing was a result of interest that exceeded our [already bullish] expectations.  I suppose only the ultimate sale of the platform(s)<br />
will show this to be the case.  We&#8217;ll keep you posted.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Ophir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EIR</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EIR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;too bad the mojungle guy can&#039;t cash out.  Looks like people out there are still rational enough to look for real business to acquire.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too bad the mojungle guy can&#8217;t cash out.  Looks like people out there are still rational enough to look for real business to acquire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Ha, I love their excuse for pulling the auction!  It seems like their business model was to do as little work as possible and then cash out after a trying to hype their product in tech blogs and YouTube videos.  I&#039;m with John on this one.  This is just a continuation of their PR scams.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, I love their excuse for pulling the auction!  It seems like their business model was to do as little work as possible and then cash out after a trying to hype their product in tech blogs and YouTube videos.  I&#8217;m with John on this one.  This is just a continuation of their PR scams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Sorry. I don&#039;t buy this at all. It&#039;s a PR stunt and everyone is falling for it, including this blog.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. I don&#8217;t buy this at all. It&#8217;s a PR stunt and everyone is falling for it, including this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Pooley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Pooley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It would be nice if this could be verified at some stage. I think there are many of us that would be interested in seeing if this result is true!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if this could be verified at some stage. I think there are many of us that would be interested in seeing if this result is true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ely Fall</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ely Fall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/mojungle-update/#comment-129798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;No bids. No surprise. Selling a startup with a starting price of $60,000 is like selling a Ferrari with a starting price of $ 3,000. It sound like I am paying for a Eclipse.
As far as other companies buying the technology, I hope this will be add-ons rather than primary features. By the way to all Web2.0 entrepreneurs: One  product is not always one Startup.
On the plus side maybe this is a business model for Mojungle. License the technology to websites which want to offer a mobile feature to their audience.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No bids. No surprise. Selling a startup with a starting price of $60,000 is like selling a Ferrari with a starting price of $ 3,000. It sound like I am paying for a Eclipse.<br />
As far as other companies buying the technology, I hope this will be add-ons rather than primary features. By the way to all Web2.0 entrepreneurs: One  product is not always one Startup.<br />
On the plus side maybe this is a business model for Mojungle. License the technology to websites which want to offer a mobile feature to their audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
