<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Reorg or Retread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indigo的数字镜像</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Indigo的数字镜像]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo 的战略重组&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yahoo 在 2006 年12月05日正式对外公布了它的 战略重组计划（一个迟到的消息），他们的运营总监  Dan Rosensweig 将会在 2007 年3月之前离职，当然这也就标志着 Yahoo 会向新的方向发展。 从最早的&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoo 的战略重组&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Yahoo 在 2006 年12月05日正式对外公布了它的 战略重组计划（一个迟到的消息），他们的运营总监  Dan Rosensweig 将会在 2007 年3月之前离职，当然这也就标志着 Yahoo 会向新的方向发展。 从最早的&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnchorsAweigh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AnchorsAweigh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yahoo has no vision of the future.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Board and Semel need to do some hard-thinking.  This is just the latest in a series of investor window-dressings.  Those who manage money have read the writing long back.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo has no vision of the future.  </p>
<p>The Board and Semel need to do some hard-thinking.  This is just the latest in a series of investor window-dressings.  Those who manage money have read the writing long back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoneranger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phoneranger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 19:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Come on Om.  When was the last time you found a good three card monte game here in NYC?  They&#039;ve been gone since the last century.  You want a more current analogy?  Semel will fix Yahoo when Bush fixes the war.  In fact they won&#039;t so it will be up to the next guy (or gal).&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Om.  When was the last time you found a good three card monte game here in NYC?  They&#8217;ve been gone since the last century.  You want a more current analogy?  Semel will fix Yahoo when Bush fixes the war.  In fact they won&#8217;t so it will be up to the next guy (or gal).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kareem Mayan's Links</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kareem Mayan's Links]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo convinces EMI to release Norah Jones single sans DRM&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB116537603826741985-TfD3l60iYwyYgj2wH5P9gTDGDy0_20070105.html&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoo convinces EMI to release Norah Jones single sans DRM&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB116537603826741985-TfD3l60iYwyYgj2wH5P9gTDGDy0_20070105.html&#038;#8230" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB116537603826741985-TfD3l60iYwyYgj2wH5P9gTDGDy0_20070105.html&#038;#8230</a>;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Morsa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Morsa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Nice, bold moves from a great company, Terry and the Yahoo team.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I may humbly suggest another:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The launch of a brand new ad platform where you&#039;d enable your advertisers to quickly and easily select and bid on the actual demographic and psychographic traits and characteristics (keytraits) of their most desired customers; instead of just the words people enter into search boxes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As explained in the white paper at MatchTo.com and detailed in it&#039;s pending patent (#11/250,908), Match Engine Marketing (MEM)/paid match would, among other things, enable Yahoo to stop Google in its tracks (while taking 10%+ of their search share), further boost the use of your many other excellent products and services, and cut human-generated click fraud by 85%+; doing so w/in 24 months of the launch of MEM (i.e. Yahoo Match Marketing).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Like paid search did before it, paid match is itself going to turn the world of advertising upside down--again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yahoo should be at the helm when it does.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, bold moves from a great company, Terry and the Yahoo team.</p>
<p>If I may humbly suggest another:</p>
<p>The launch of a brand new ad platform where you&#8217;d enable your advertisers to quickly and easily select and bid on the actual demographic and psychographic traits and characteristics (keytraits) of their most desired customers; instead of just the words people enter into search boxes.</p>
<p>As explained in the white paper at MatchTo.com and detailed in it&#8217;s pending patent (#11/250,908), Match Engine Marketing (MEM)/paid match would, among other things, enable Yahoo to stop Google in its tracks (while taking 10%+ of their search share), further boost the use of your many other excellent products and services, and cut human-generated click fraud by 85%+; doing so w/in 24 months of the launch of MEM (i.e. Yahoo Match Marketing).</p>
<p>Like paid search did before it, paid match is itself going to turn the world of advertising upside down&#8211;again.</p>
<p>Yahoo should be at the helm when it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft News Tracker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Microsoft News Tracker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo rearranges the deck chairs&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;Yahoo is a key competitor to Microsoft&#8217;s Web aspirations so yesterday&#8217;s shuffle of the executive suite has some bearing:
Yahoo said Tuesday that it was restructuring its operations and shuffling its management ranks amid growing criticism&#8230;
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoo rearranges the deck chairs&#8230;</strong></p>
<pre><code>Yahoo is a key competitor to Microsoft&#8217;s Web aspirations so yesterday&#8217;s shuffle of the executive suite has some bearing:
Yahoo said Tuesday that it was restructuring its operations and shuffling its management ranks amid growing criticism&#8230;
</code></pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Griffin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Griffin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Viewing the announcement through an agency lens, I wonder about construction of the (mandatory) bridge between the &quot;Audience&quot; group and the &quot;Advertisers and Publishers&quot; group.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In business terms, what will &quot;great user experiences&quot; deliver to Yahoo!, beyond more eyeballs -- which the company obviously does not need?  Without an innovative means of monetizing these experiences, one that is embraced by &lt;em&gt;people&lt;/em&gt; (that is inclusive of consumers and advertisers, of course), there is no path that is truly forward&#8230;and hint, the solution will not be found in the disruptive tactics (read: banner ads) of our medium&#039;s infancy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yahoo!&#039;s general approach to the market and their &quot;partners&quot; aside, the above is the big issue from where I sit -- and one that I would have liked to have seen formally addressed in a structural fashion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I applaud the destruction of the product groups/managers&#8230;whose lack of incentive to innovate has left advertisers in a consistent quandary for many years now.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viewing the announcement through an agency lens, I wonder about construction of the (mandatory) bridge between the &#8220;Audience&#8221; group and the &#8220;Advertisers and Publishers&#8221; group.</p>
<p>In business terms, what will &#8220;great user experiences&#8221; deliver to Yahoo!, beyond more eyeballs &#8212; which the company obviously does not need?  Without an innovative means of monetizing these experiences, one that is embraced by <em>people</em> (that is inclusive of consumers and advertisers, of course), there is no path that is truly forward&#8230;and hint, the solution will not be found in the disruptive tactics (read: banner ads) of our medium&#8217;s infancy.</p>
<p>Yahoo!&#8217;s general approach to the market and their &#8220;partners&#8221; aside, the above is the big issue from where I sit &#8212; and one that I would have liked to have seen formally addressed in a structural fashion.</p>
<p>That said, I applaud the destruction of the product groups/managers&#8230;whose lack of incentive to innovate has left advertisers in a consistent quandary for many years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ward-o-blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ward-o-blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Blog:  Web Worker Daily&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I stumbled upon a new blog the other day that is a very interesting topic to me: Web Worker Daily. It&#039;s a new property from the folks that offer up GigaOM, and it&#039;s a glimpse into the world of&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New Blog:  Web Worker Daily&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I stumbled upon a new blog the other day that is a very interesting topic to me: Web Worker Daily. It&#8217;s a new property from the folks that offer up GigaOM, and it&#8217;s a glimpse into the world of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think this speech was pulled right out of a Dilbert cartoon.  They forgot &quot;empower key motivators.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would have liked to see a list of actual initiatives or objectives&#8230; something we could really sink our teeth into.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this speech was pulled right out of a Dilbert cartoon.  They forgot &#8220;empower key motivators.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would have liked to see a list of actual initiatives or objectives&#8230; something we could really sink our teeth into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-reorg/#comment-129187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Where does Ash Patel land in all this? It seems like CPO comes close to being the advocate for the audience.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does Ash Patel land in all this? It seems like CPO comes close to being the advocate for the audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
