<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will iPhone Save Handset Business?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Carlson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-887396</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-887396</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good review — but there remain some nagging questions. No IM means not even Apple’s iChat will work? (I suppose so, but that seems odd.)
I assume as well that no VOI like Skype can be downloaded to use when on WiFi.
Full fledged web browser should mean all webmail programs work on iPhone, but I never see Hotmail mentioned among the examples. Is this just a courtesy — or do some webmails not work for some reason?
MAIN QUESTION: will the iPhone work for WiFi without an ATT plan? I’d be happy to use it as an iPod/PDA/WiFi device — at least until I can get out of my Verizon plan without eating a penalty. I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://bestratescall.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;calling cards&lt;/a&gt;, using free &lt;a href=&quot;http://bestratescall.com/cards/comp.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;phone 
card comparison&lt;/a&gt; tool to lower my cellular calling cost.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review — but there remain some nagging questions. No IM means not even Apple’s iChat will work? (I suppose so, but that seems odd.)
I assume as well that no VOI like Skype can be downloaded to use when on WiFi.
Full fledged web browser should mean all webmail programs work on iPhone, but I never see Hotmail mentioned among the examples. Is this just a courtesy — or do some webmails not work for some reason?
MAIN QUESTION: will the iPhone work for WiFi without an ATT plan? I’d be happy to use it as an iPod/PDA/WiFi device — at least until I can get out of my Verizon plan without eating a penalty. I like <a href="http://bestratescall.com" rel="nofollow">calling cards</a>, using free <a href="http://bestratescall.com/cards/comp.html" rel="nofollow">phone 
card comparison</a> tool to lower my cellular calling cost.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM 5 ways iPhone will change the wireless biz &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-177016</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM 5 ways iPhone will change the wireless biz &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-177016</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] The introduction of the unlocked iPhone will do two things – it would basically get US buyers savvy to the idea of buying full priced unlocked phones. Secondly, it is going to cause a behavior change - of buying phones instead of freebies. (Will iPhone save the handset business?) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The introduction of the unlocked iPhone will do two things – it would basically get US buyers savvy to the idea of buying full priced unlocked phones. Secondly, it is going to cause a behavior change &#8211; of buying phones instead of freebies. (Will iPhone save the handset business?) [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spark Minute » Blog Archive &#187; iPhone rumor specifics. Warner CEO&#8217;s kids are music thieves.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73764</link>
		<dc:creator>Spark Minute » Blog Archive &#187; iPhone rumor specifics. Warner CEO&#8217;s kids are music thieves.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73764</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the latest on the iPhone, there are plenty of specific rumors on a potential release in January. According to reports, the phone will have both GSM and CDMA radios making it carrier independent. Plus it will have a [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the latest on the iPhone, there are plenty of specific rumors on a potential release in January. According to reports, the phone will have both GSM and CDMA radios making it carrier independent. Plus it will have a [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katrishev Oleg</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73771</link>
		<dc:creator>Katrishev Oleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think iphone is a greatest gadget that I ever seen ! I love it!
Check this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salecalls.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;prepaid phone cards&lt;/a&gt; shop. Here you can find large variety of calling cards and rates! Call directly from your mobile phones!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think iphone is a greatest gadget that I ever seen ! I love it!
Check this <a href="http://www.salecalls.com/" rel="nofollow">prepaid phone cards</a> shop. Here you can find large variety of calling cards and rates! Call directly from your mobile phones!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73762</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As an authorized agent of Unicel in the Northeast, this phone will be in hot demand at the retail price.  Yes, some people, many people, still need basic handsets.  However, the Apple name and product is enough for me to move several of these units.  An unlocked quad-band phone works just fine on the Unicel network.  I was selliing the KRZR and the SLVR long before Unicel brought them into inventory at full retail price and had buyers.  Right now I&#039;ve been moving the RIZR and the Sanyo D-900 in the $500 price range.  I believe the iPhone will move more units than any of the previously mentioned phones.  How sure of this am I?  There is no Cingular service in my state.  The customers (the same ones that drop hundreds of dollars on PS3, XBOX, or Wii) will have no option but to pay the full retail price to use it on our network.  Cha-Ching!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an authorized agent of Unicel in the Northeast, this phone will be in hot demand at the retail price.  Yes, some people, many people, still need basic handsets.  However, the Apple name and product is enough for me to move several of these units.  An unlocked quad-band phone works just fine on the Unicel network.  I was selliing the KRZR and the SLVR long before Unicel brought them into inventory at full retail price and had buyers.  Right now I&#8217;ve been moving the RIZR and the Sanyo D-900 in the $500 price range.  I believe the iPhone will move more units than any of the previously mentioned phones.  How sure of this am I?  There is no Cingular service in my state.  The customers (the same ones that drop hundreds of dollars on PS3, XBOX, or Wii) will have no option but to pay the full retail price to use it on our network.  Cha-Ching!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73760</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73760</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Check out www.cheepzone.com for cheap cell phones, electronics and gifts! for christmass! Everythign is CHEAP!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;www.cheepzone.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://www.cheepzone.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cheepzone.com</a> for cheap cell phones, electronics and gifts! for christmass! Everythign is CHEAP!</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cheepzone.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cheepzone.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unsought Input</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73758</link>
		<dc:creator>Unsought Input</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73758</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;10 Reasons You Will Want the Apple iPhone&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since the dawn of time, man has wondered: will Apple come out with a iPhone, and will it match the success of the iPod?
This is the Internet, of course, so by the dawn of time I mean three or four years ago, well before the Motorolla Rokr came out.  De&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>10 Reasons You Will Want the Apple iPhone&#8230;</strong></p>

<p>Since the dawn of time, man has wondered: will Apple come out with a iPhone, and will it match the success of the iPod?
This is the Internet, of course, so by the dawn of time I mean three or four years ago, well before the Motorolla Rokr came out.  De&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubergizmo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73756</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubergizmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73756</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The iPhone Will Save Nothing&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This article suggests that the iPhone might &#8220;get US buyers savvy to the idea of buying full priced unlocked phones&#8221; instead of getting subsidized phones. This could&#160;&#8220;Save the Handset Business&#8221; (from the carriers). It&amp;rsquo&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The iPhone Will Save Nothing&#8230;</strong></p>

<p>This article suggests that the iPhone might &ldquo;get US buyers savvy to the idea of buying full priced unlocked phones&rdquo; instead of getting subsidized phones. This could&nbsp;&ldquo;Save the Handset Business&rdquo; (from the carriers). It&amp;rsquo&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EDEK</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73754</link>
		<dc:creator>EDEK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73754</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is very unlikely that carriers subsidizing phones will disappear from the market because this would go against basic consumer psychology. Customers want to pay as little as possible upfront even if that means paying more over time for the service. Look at printers, where most of the money is made on toners. Look at game consoles where most of the money is made on the games themselves. Subsidizing handsets is a one-way street, once the customers are used to it, there is no way back. Carriers already found this to be the case in many European markets where their efforts to reduce handset subsidies failed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very unlikely that carriers subsidizing phones will disappear from the market because this would go against basic consumer psychology. Customers want to pay as little as possible upfront even if that means paying more over time for the service. Look at printers, where most of the money is made on toners. Look at game consoles where most of the money is made on the games themselves. Subsidizing handsets is a one-way street, once the customers are used to it, there is no way back. Carriers already found this to be the case in many European markets where their efforts to reduce handset subsidies failed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ol' Yeller</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73752</link>
		<dc:creator>Ol' Yeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73752</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why would Jobs pass up on a revenue share opportunity when the potential amount to be had is on the order of $180 of pure profit in ONE year?  What&#039;s the best sceneario on profit on hardware sales for one high-end iPod - $180 AT BEST!  So, if you think Jobs is just out to help people and not to make money, then he&#039;ll count on hardware revenue only and sell an unlocked phone.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s easy to lock a phone that connects to a proprietary data services platform - iTunes!  Sure, you could take your locked phone and make phone calls and send text messages on another carrier network - and probably sync your music onto it - but you&#039;d miss out on all the great connected features that Apple will surely include with this handset.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Jobs pass up on a revenue share opportunity when the potential amount to be had is on the order of $180 of pure profit in ONE year?  What&#8217;s the best sceneario on profit on hardware sales for one high-end iPod &#8211; $180 AT BEST!  So, if you think Jobs is just out to help people and not to make money, then he&#8217;ll count on hardware revenue only and sell an unlocked phone.  </p>

<p>It&#8217;s easy to lock a phone that connects to a proprietary data services platform &#8211; iTunes!  Sure, you could take your locked phone and make phone calls and send text messages on another carrier network &#8211; and probably sync your music onto it &#8211; but you&#8217;d miss out on all the great connected features that Apple will surely include with this handset.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremiah256</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73750</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremiah256</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73750</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My guess is the iPhone (or whatever it&#039;s called) will be positioned over the other music devices and will be the high-end item.  iPod Shuffle -&gt; Nano -&gt; Video -&gt; Phone.  They&#039;re (supposedly) ordering 12 million phones so you can bet they&#039;ll be unlocked so they can sell them as world phones.  I don&#039;t know if they&#039;ll create their own MVNO immediately but it might be in their best interests eventually to combine it with the iTunes Music store.  I need a new phone (bad) but I&#039;m waiting until after January.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is the iPhone (or whatever it&#8217;s called) will be positioned over the other music devices and will be the high-end item.  iPod Shuffle -&gt; Nano -&gt; Video -&gt; Phone.  They&#8217;re (supposedly) ordering 12 million phones so you can bet they&#8217;ll be unlocked so they can sell them as world phones.  I don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;ll create their own MVNO immediately but it might be in their best interests eventually to combine it with the iTunes Music store.  I need a new phone (bad) but I&#8217;m waiting until after January.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73748</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73748</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;dani, agree but it&#039;s still too early for Apple to do by itself.  If they were to partner with Google and one or two other solid hotspot providers, then maybe.  So someday&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The issue with an MVNO is that it puts the Apple brand name on an underlying cellular service without having the ability to control the quality of that service.  They could provide better customer service, but they can&#039;t do anything about reliability, dropped calls, etc.  So I think they&#039;d be better off allowing the user to choose the service provider themselves, in the same way that one chooses an Internet service provider (cable/dsl).  The Apple Store could sell SIM cards from a variety of cellular providers (GSM only) to go with the unlocked iPod phone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then, in the same way that the iTunes Store and .Mac rides atop the Internet cable/dsl service, Apple can sell services (iChat, iTunes Store, MobileMe) atop the cellular service.  The potential for these services is huge, especially those that could entice a user to use Mac OS X and iLife.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dani, agree but it&#8217;s still too early for Apple to do by itself.  If they were to partner with Google and one or two other solid hotspot providers, then maybe.  So someday&#8230;</p>

<p>The issue with an MVNO is that it puts the Apple brand name on an underlying cellular service without having the ability to control the quality of that service.  They could provide better customer service, but they can&#8217;t do anything about reliability, dropped calls, etc.  So I think they&#8217;d be better off allowing the user to choose the service provider themselves, in the same way that one chooses an Internet service provider (cable/dsl).  The Apple Store could sell SIM cards from a variety of cellular providers (GSM only) to go with the unlocked iPod phone.</p>

<p>Then, in the same way that the iTunes Store and .Mac rides atop the Internet cable/dsl service, Apple can sell services (iChat, iTunes Store, MobileMe) atop the cellular service.  The potential for these services is huge, especially those that could entice a user to use Mac OS X and iLife.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73747</link>
		<dc:creator>dani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73747</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Forget the Sim cards.
Here is the magic formula:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ipod + Wifi + Hotspots + VOIP &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;The wifi kills the mobile star&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;:D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget the Sim cards.
Here is the magic formula:</p>

<p>Ipod + Wifi + Hotspots + VOIP </p>

<p>&#8220;The wifi kills the mobile star&#8221;</p>

<p>:D</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73746</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 03:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;varomir,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You bring up solid errors in my post.  I should have used Cingular and TMobile as my SiM swapping example in the States, as they are doing it for millions of customers.  My oversight.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for Apple selling prepaid SIM cards, I had in mind the same arrangement that, say, Apple has with retailers that sell prepaid iTunes cards.  I don&#039;t see why Apple partnering with mobile carriers to put this into action would be a problem.  Nor do I think it&#039;s requisite to selling an unlocked iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for the price point, Apple doesn&#039;t need to sell a $99 iPhone for it to be successful, for the same reason they didn&#039;t sell a $99 iPod out of the gate.  There are plenty of customers at the $400-700 range that will happily buy an iPhone.  We&#039;re already paying those prices for unlocked phones offered by Sony Ericsson.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>varomir,</p>

<p>You bring up solid errors in my post.  I should have used Cingular and TMobile as my SiM swapping example in the States, as they are doing it for millions of customers.  My oversight.</p>

<p>As for Apple selling prepaid SIM cards, I had in mind the same arrangement that, say, Apple has with retailers that sell prepaid iTunes cards.  I don&#8217;t see why Apple partnering with mobile carriers to put this into action would be a problem.  Nor do I think it&#8217;s requisite to selling an unlocked iPhone.</p>

<p>As for the price point, Apple doesn&#8217;t need to sell a $99 iPhone for it to be successful, for the same reason they didn&#8217;t sell a $99 iPod out of the gate.  There are plenty of customers at the $400-700 range that will happily buy an iPhone.  We&#8217;re already paying those prices for unlocked phones offered by Sony Ericsson.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: --don</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73697</link>
		<dc:creator>--don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73697</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just remember that key to Apple is branding. The one thing about an Apple branded MVNO is that Apple could protect their brand. Once they hand it off to any US Carrier, they would tarnish their image. They can afford to stay out of the market if they can&#039;t protect their brand/image.  I would say their best bet is to do an GSM based MVNO service in the US to start. Savvy users that travel could figure out how to do the SIM swap thing. Apple could then work on EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa) providers. When they can&#039;t control everything they tend to so tiered launches like with iTunes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CDMA is key for Asia and seem to remember a a rumor a while back that Japan was going to get an iPhone first via Softbank Mobile (formerly Vodafone Japan, and before that J-Phone).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having said all that, maybe the wait is they are making a GSM/CDMA phone. Motorola has made one in the past: http://www.motorola.com/motoinfo/product/details.jsp?globalObjectId=49&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess we can just wait. Not like Apple is going to release any details any time soon!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just remember that key to Apple is branding. The one thing about an Apple branded MVNO is that Apple could protect their brand. Once they hand it off to any US Carrier, they would tarnish their image. They can afford to stay out of the market if they can&#8217;t protect their brand/image.  I would say their best bet is to do an GSM based MVNO service in the US to start. Savvy users that travel could figure out how to do the SIM swap thing. Apple could then work on EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa) providers. When they can&#8217;t control everything they tend to so tiered launches like with iTunes.</p>

<p>CDMA is key for Asia and seem to remember a a rumor a while back that Japan was going to get an iPhone first via Softbank Mobile (formerly Vodafone Japan, and before that J-Phone).</p>

<p>Having said all that, maybe the wait is they are making a GSM/CDMA phone. Motorola has made one in the past: <a href="http://www.motorola.com/motoinfo/product/details.jsp?globalObjectId=49" rel="nofollow">http://www.motorola.com/motoinfo/product/details.jsp?globalObjectId=49</a></p>

<p>I guess we can just wait. Not like Apple is going to release any details any time soon!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yaromir</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73660</link>
		<dc:creator>yaromir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 23:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/iphone/#comment-73660</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Matthew wrote:
&quot;The alternative, to partner with one or two carriers is absurd these days, as people travel around the country and around the world and want ONE mobile phone. An unlocked phone solves that problem and is, really, a non-issue to consumers just so long as it’s unlocked.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Disagree. This is an idealistic point of view. It&#039;s too early to say that if you have ONE unlocked phone, you can get a wireless service around the globe. You still need a carrier anyway. While you can have ONE phone (if it&#039;s unlocked)with GSM carriers (even GSM bands are different in Europe and US, so this phone should support all four GSM bands), you would end up with different phone numbers for each country you go. What about CDMA carriers, they don&#039;t use SIM cards (at least the SIM cards that can be inserted by users). What about Asia, Japan or South Korea? They don&#039;t use SIM cards as well. You mentioned Verizon and Sprint, but they don&#039;t support SIM cards and unlocking is quite difficult with CDMA phones. Last thought, the majority of people don&#039;t travel much on business, only minority does. So, they don&#039;t need ONE phone, they need cheap or free phone that is good for making voice calls and that looks cool. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Besides controlling features on handsets, why do you think carriers sell phones under $99? In order to lure customers to sign a contract, ideally for 2 years. Carriers don&#039;t make money selling handsets, they make money selling wireless service. Without subsidizing the phones, it would be much difficult to get people onboard. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How do you think Apple is going to seel prepaid SIM cards? To do that, Apple will need to partner with carriers to buy wireless traffic from them and resell it to iPhone users (the so-called MVNO model).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew wrote:
&#8220;The alternative, to partner with one or two carriers is absurd these days, as people travel around the country and around the world and want ONE mobile phone. An unlocked phone solves that problem and is, really, a non-issue to consumers just so long as it’s unlocked.&#8221;</p>

<p>Disagree. This is an idealistic point of view. It&#8217;s too early to say that if you have ONE unlocked phone, you can get a wireless service around the globe. You still need a carrier anyway. While you can have ONE phone (if it&#8217;s unlocked)with GSM carriers (even GSM bands are different in Europe and US, so this phone should support all four GSM bands), you would end up with different phone numbers for each country you go. What about CDMA carriers, they don&#8217;t use SIM cards (at least the SIM cards that can be inserted by users). What about Asia, Japan or South Korea? They don&#8217;t use SIM cards as well. You mentioned Verizon and Sprint, but they don&#8217;t support SIM cards and unlocking is quite difficult with CDMA phones. Last thought, the majority of people don&#8217;t travel much on business, only minority does. So, they don&#8217;t need ONE phone, they need cheap or free phone that is good for making voice calls and that looks cool. </p>

<p>Besides controlling features on handsets, why do you think carriers sell phones under $99? In order to lure customers to sign a contract, ideally for 2 years. Carriers don&#8217;t make money selling handsets, they make money selling wireless service. Without subsidizing the phones, it would be much difficult to get people onboard. </p>

<p>How do you think Apple is going to seel prepaid SIM cards? To do that, Apple will need to partner with carriers to buy wireless traffic from them and resell it to iPhone users (the so-called MVNO model).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
