<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networking by the Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WebMetricsGuru</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-491526</link>
		<dc:creator>WebMetricsGuru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-491526</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Engagement  - defining social network engagement metrics&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Engagement - how do we measure Social Network Engagement&#160;(Social Networking by the&#160;Numbers - but the problem is that Social Networks were measured by numbers of members not by engagement, even though Engagement - Social Network Engagement is ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Engagement  &#8211; defining social network engagement metrics</strong></p>

<p>Engagement &#8211; how do we measure Social Network Engagement&nbsp;(Social Networking by the&nbsp;Numbers &#8211; but the problem is that Social Networks were measured by numbers of members not by engagement, even though Engagement &#8211; Social Network Engagement is &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moko - Mobile Community with 100 Million Page Views Per Month at Social Local Mobile</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-472864</link>
		<dc:creator>Moko - Mobile Community with 100 Million Page Views Per Month at Social Local Mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-472864</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] per user and is far higher than comparable social networks profiled in a 2006 Hitwise study on social network user engagement. And that makes Moko potentially very profitable. The graph to the right (click to expand) shows [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] per user and is far higher than comparable social networks profiled in a 2006 Hitwise study on social network user engagement. And that makes Moko potentially very profitable. The graph to the right (click to expand) shows [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71750</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71750</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;MySpace is so outdated!  The new place to be is www.wi-fitv.com!  Not only can you upload video and pictures, but you have a number of pages you can creat your own little world in.  They also offer tv channels from all over the world.  Like I said, this is the place to be!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MySpace is so outdated!  The new place to be is <a href="http://www.wi-fitv.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wi-fitv.com</a>!  Not only can you upload video and pictures, but you have a number of pages you can creat your own little world in.  They also offer tv channels from all over the world.  Like I said, this is the place to be!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime Macias</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71749</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Macias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71749</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe I missed it, what is the source of that chart?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;JM&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I missed it, what is the source of that chart?</p>

<p>Thanks, </p>

<p>JM</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PageTurner.info</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71748</link>
		<dc:creator>PageTurner.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71748</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Soziale Netzwerke und Benutzerzahlen: reine Gigantomanie&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GigaOm (&#8221;Social Networking by the Numbers&#8220;, 9.11.2006) hat interessante Zahlen zusammen getragen. Pure Gigantomanie &#8230; und ohne Gew&#228;hr &#8230;
Cyworld: 20 Million Benutzer, das sind 40% der Bev&#246;lkerung in Korea (das Land mi&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Soziale Netzwerke und Benutzerzahlen: reine Gigantomanie&#8230;</strong></p>

<p>GigaOm (&#8221;Social Networking by the Numbers&#8220;, 9.11.2006) hat interessante Zahlen zusammen getragen. Pure Gigantomanie &#8230; und ohne Gew&#228;hr &#8230;
Cyworld: 20 Million Benutzer, das sind 40% der Bev&#246;lkerung in Korea (das Land mi&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Raich</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71747</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Raich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71747</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Neue Social Networking Zahlen aus den USA&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;MySpace führt mit über 127 Millonen Benutzern weltweit immer noch ungeschlagen die Hitparade der Social networking Seiten an (über 80% des US Marktes), während andere besser auf der Profitseite agieren zu scheinen. Cyworld, die koreanische Network&#8230;
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Neue Social Networking Zahlen aus den USA&#8230;</strong></p>

<pre><code>MySpace führt mit über 127 Millonen Benutzern weltweit immer noch ungeschlagen die Hitparade der Social networking Seiten an (über 80% des US Marktes), während andere besser auf der Profitseite agieren zu scheinen. Cyworld, die koreanische Network&#8230;
</code></pre>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71746</link>
		<dc:creator>louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have heard a rumour that there is a new social website constructed by the British. Apparently it combines the best features of both MySpace and Facebook with a host of extra stuff. They&#039;re calling it web2.5. I&#039;ll post back when I get the name of the site. Do you think there is room for another?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard a rumour that there is a new social website constructed by the British. Apparently it combines the best features of both MySpace and Facebook with a host of extra stuff. They&#8217;re calling it web2.5. I&#8217;ll post back when I get the name of the site. Do you think there is room for another?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McNamara</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71745</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McNamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71745</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yet most school districts still do not have policies governing the use of social-networking sites, according to a survey released yesterday by the National School Boards Association. It&#039;s the first time they&#039;ve asked their membership about this topic. Details here:
http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/9169&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet most school districts still do not have policies governing the use of social-networking sites, according to a survey released yesterday by the National School Boards Association. It&#8217;s the first time they&#8217;ve asked their membership about this topic. Details here:
<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/9169" rel="nofollow">http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/9169</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71744</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71744</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Avg session time on Facebook MIGHT be true, but I&#039;d say they&#039;re the top in terms of cumulative hours a day&#8230; people leave it up all day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And MySpace is so poorly designed that the simplest things take 8 page views, so splitting up the market inflates MySpace&#039;s numbers if you do it by pageviews.  How about unique, active real human users?  They&#039;re still tops, but not by as ridiculous a margain.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avg session time on Facebook MIGHT be true, but I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re the top in terms of cumulative hours a day&#8230; people leave it up all day.</p>

<p>And MySpace is so poorly designed that the simplest things take 8 page views, so splitting up the market inflates MySpace&#8217;s numbers if you do it by pageviews.  How about unique, active real human users?  They&#8217;re still tops, but not by as ridiculous a margain.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71743</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 08:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71743</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Those numbers are great but this is coming from a country where the majority of the population access the internet via mobile as their primary online access point.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think you&#039;re talking about Japan, Ted. Koreans use fixed line as our main channel. You have to get your facts right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;jack&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Those numbers are great but this is coming from a country where the majority of the population access the internet via mobile as their primary online access point.&#8221;</p>

<p>I think you&#8217;re talking about Japan, Ted. Koreans use fixed line as our main channel. You have to get your facts right.</p>

<p>jack</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumant</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71742</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 07:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71742</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well facebook definitely has much control over spam and who gets on the site unlike myspace. But dismissing myspace would be totally stupid. Facebook has become too intrusive with every little detail of your activity made public and this could backfire its popularity. On the other side myspace lets you control how much visibility of your profile you want to share with the world and yes you can have multiple profiles and what not. Its interesting to see who gets more eye balls.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well facebook definitely has much control over spam and who gets on the site unlike myspace. But dismissing myspace would be totally stupid. Facebook has become too intrusive with every little detail of your activity made public and this could backfire its popularity. On the other side myspace lets you control how much visibility of your profile you want to share with the world and yes you can have multiple profiles and what not. Its interesting to see who gets more eye balls.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TickerHound.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71741</link>
		<dc:creator>TickerHound.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 05:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71741</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Social Networking by the Numbers&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some interesting figures from social networking company executives here at the Web 2.0 Summit. Cyworld and MySpace are, more than ever, heads and shoulders above the competition&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social Networking by the Numbers&#8230;</strong></p>

<p>Some interesting figures from social networking company executives here at the Web 2.0 Summit. Cyworld and MySpace are, more than ever, heads and shoulders above the competition&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71740</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 04:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71740</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Eric about the full picture of these sites (how long, how many times per day, this is not ValleyWag so I won&#039;t assume that those comments will be misinterpreted). And I will say that Ted&#039;s point about Facebook&#039;s quality of users is a good one (although now that it&#039;s open to everyone I bet we start seeing more stripper friends). &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MySpace is still a great way to blog/post pictures/videos/express yourself/connect with friends (old and new)/ and discover new music.  It&#039;s THE all-in-one Web2.0 platform&#8230; If you think it&#039;s all porn and spam - you just signed on to see what it was all about - you&#039;re not actually part of the community.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Eric about the full picture of these sites (how long, how many times per day, this is not ValleyWag so I won&#8217;t assume that those comments will be misinterpreted). And I will say that Ted&#8217;s point about Facebook&#8217;s quality of users is a good one (although now that it&#8217;s open to everyone I bet we start seeing more stripper friends). </p>

<p>MySpace is still a great way to blog/post pictures/videos/express yourself/connect with friends (old and new)/ and discover new music.  It&#8217;s THE all-in-one Web2.0 platform&#8230; If you think it&#8217;s all porn and spam &#8211; you just signed on to see what it was all about &#8211; you&#8217;re not actually part of the community.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71739</link>
		<dc:creator>alanp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 02:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71739</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Postscript&#8230;apparently MySpace won&#039;t delete a profile no matter how hard you try, so &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/fuck-myspace/myspace-is-a-loser-so-were-resorting-to-porn-178829.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this lot&lt;/a&gt; stuffed theirs with porn to get it deleted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe thats where all the porn comes from :D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Postscript&#8230;apparently MySpace won&#8217;t delete a profile no matter how hard you try, so <a href="http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/fuck-myspace/myspace-is-a-loser-so-were-resorting-to-porn-178829.php" rel="nofollow">this lot</a> stuffed theirs with porn to get it deleted.</p>

<p>Maybe thats where all the porn comes from :D</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71738</link>
		<dc:creator>alanp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 02:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71738</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Liz&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have you been on MySpace lately&#8230;its appalling&#8230;its just porn, spam and false friends.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz</p>

<p>Have you been on MySpace lately&#8230;its appalling&#8230;its just porn, spam and false friends.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71737</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 01:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/social-networking-by-the-numbers/#comment-71737</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;seriously, what is the myspace number minus: spam + adverprofiles + dormant/abandoned + duplicates + spam + spam? i&#039;m guessing actual numbers are closer to 2x facebook, but before those same numbers are used for facebook (as in, remove dupes, etc)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously, what is the myspace number minus: spam + adverprofiles + dormant/abandoned + duplicates + spam + spam? i&#8217;m guessing actual numbers are closer to 2x facebook, but before those same numbers are used for facebook (as in, remove dupes, etc)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
