<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GTalk adds offline message support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/11/02/gtalk-adds-offline-message-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/02/gtalk-adds-offline-message-support/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:14:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trejkaz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/11/02/gtalk-adds-offline-message-support/#comment-127190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trejkaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/11/02/gtalk-adds-offline-message-support/#comment-127190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;This is obviously a crock.  They still haven&#039;t added this feature even today.  If you send a message from another server to an offline gmail.com contact, it says &quot;server does not provide this service&quot;.  I&#039;ve tested this dozens of times on my own account because I&#039;m planning to move everything to Google&#039;s server once they support this feature.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is obviously a crock.  They still haven&#8217;t added this feature even today.  If you send a message from another server to an offline gmail.com contact, it says &#8220;server does not provide this service&#8221;.  I&#8217;ve tested this dozens of times on my own account because I&#8217;m planning to move everything to Google&#8217;s server once they support this feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

