<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Searches for Korean Mobile Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/10/30/google-sk-telecom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/30/google-sk-telecom/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:24:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max Christian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/30/google-sk-telecom/#comment-71254</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/30/google-sk-telecom/#comment-71254</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google doesn&#039;t stand a chance.  Apart from the competitive environment which the previous poster describes well, the fact is that Google simply doesn&#039;t work well for searches in Korean.  A trivial example is that the concept of a word is somewhat different in Korean -- there are spaces between them but most continuous strings of &#039;letters&#039; also have words within them.  Google&#039;s search engine doesn&#039;t seem to understand this (and much else besides) and the results are not good.  Ask almost any Korean speaker.  It&#039;s crazy for them to be trying to expand through marketing efforts when the product is poor compared to the competition.  I hope a Korean search company beats Google to the Chinese market (Chinese is much more similar to Korean than to English), as they certainly deserve to based on performance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google doesn&#8217;t stand a chance.  Apart from the competitive environment which the previous poster describes well, the fact is that Google simply doesn&#8217;t work well for searches in Korean.  A trivial example is that the concept of a word is somewhat different in Korean &#8212; there are spaces between them but most continuous strings of &#8216;letters&#8217; also have words within them.  Google&#8217;s search engine doesn&#8217;t seem to understand this (and much else besides) and the results are not good.  Ask almost any Korean speaker.  It&#8217;s crazy for them to be trying to expand through marketing efforts when the product is poor compared to the competition.  I hope a Korean search company beats Google to the Chinese market (Chinese is much more similar to Korean than to English), as they certainly deserve to based on performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Won</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/30/google-sk-telecom/#comment-71253</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Won</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/30/google-sk-telecom/#comment-71253</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What&#039;s funny about Google&#039;s Korean push is that it comes so late in the game. It almost parallels Wal-Mart&#039;s entry into Korea a few years ago when they thought they could just work in Korea because they were so big elsewhere. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Very few US firms have been able to import their technology into Korea and we&#039;re seeing the first signs of an agressive Korean push into the US. Korea&#039;s homebrewed portals, search, tech firms are so on the curve of the latest, I&#039;m gonna say Google is going to have to buy someone local if they want to get anywhere. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just to put things in perspective: Video re-broadcast on broadband of the hottest TV shows started in 2000. Micropayments ala iTunes style has been around for more than 5 years. Google (and other US firms) should setup massive R&amp;D setups to make Korea it&#039;s own playground of future tech. The US&#039; mobile-startup firm looks pitiful compared to whats available on the Korean market.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s funny about Google&#8217;s Korean push is that it comes so late in the game. It almost parallels Wal-Mart&#8217;s entry into Korea a few years ago when they thought they could just work in Korea because they were so big elsewhere. </p>
<p>Very few US firms have been able to import their technology into Korea and we&#8217;re seeing the first signs of an agressive Korean push into the US. Korea&#8217;s homebrewed portals, search, tech firms are so on the curve of the latest, I&#8217;m gonna say Google is going to have to buy someone local if they want to get anywhere. </p>
<p>Just to put things in perspective: Video re-broadcast on broadband of the hottest TV shows started in 2000. Micropayments ala iTunes style has been around for more than 5 years. Google (and other US firms) should setup massive R&amp;D setups to make Korea it&#8217;s own playground of future tech. The US&#8217; mobile-startup firm looks pitiful compared to whats available on the Korean market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/30/google-sk-telecom/#comment-71252</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/30/google-sk-telecom/#comment-71252</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;http://digg.com/tech&lt;em&gt;news/Google&lt;/em&gt;Searches&lt;em&gt;for&lt;/em&gt;Korean&lt;em&gt;Mobile&lt;/em&gt;Market&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digg.com/tech" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/tech</a><em>news/Google</em>Searches<em>for</em>Korean<em>Mobile</em>Market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
