7 Comments

Summary:

So it looks like Master Chief will have to keep waiting in the lobby a bit longer. The gruff cyborg hero of the Halo series (the crown jewel of Microsoft’s Xbox consoles) was set to star in a film adaptation produced by Lord of the Rings […]

So it looks like Master Chief will have to keep waiting in the lobby a bit longer. The gruff cyborg hero of the Halo series (the crown jewel of Microsoft’s Xbox consoles) was set to star in a film adaptation produced by Lord of the Rings auteur Peter Jackson, in a deal Microsoft signed in 2005 with both Fox and Universal Studios.

(In a display of adorably geeky charm– or total ballsy arrogance– Microsoft put their approved screenplay up for bid by sending copies through couriers dressed up in Master Chief’s gleaming battle armor, who’d then sit uncomfortably in the studio foyer, waiting for executives to finish reading the script.) In a statement released last Friday, Microsoft reported that Universal wanted to renegotiate financial terms, and rather than do that, Microsoft trudged out of the deal altogether, sniffing (with a hint of hurt peevishness), “We are already in discussions with potential partners who recognize the value of the ‘Halo’ brand.”

That Universal balked is no suprise: with an estimated budget already pegged at $145 million, the project would have to earn over $350 million at the box office, to break even. (Rule of Hollywood thumb: a movie needs to gross 2.5 times its budget, to become profitable.) The economic track record for game adaptations is unrelentingly mediocre (except for the first Tomb Raider movie), and the Halo movie’s closest precedent, 2005’s Doom, took in a pathetic $55 million worldwide.

The real mystery is why Microsoft is still plowing ahead. Has anyone bothered to tell them a Halo movie must be one of the most ill-inconceived film projects ever?

I say this as someone who still enjoys playing the PC version of the first game, but as a movie project, the plot is basically Aliens slapped on top of several Star Trek: Next Generation episodes (just with cooler, Biblical-sounding names), and little appeal outside its hardcore fanbase. And that’s not even the worst of its problems, to wit: The protagonist is a faceless killing machine with no personality who wears an opaque helmet through the whole thing. It’s as if Microsoft decided that basic, time-tested Hollywood storytelling rules don’t apply to them. (For example, that a hero should be likeable, sympathetic, and someone that an A list star would want to play– which usually involves, you know, being able to see their face.)

There has to be an explanation for Microsoft’s stubborness, other than a desire to go Hollywood (a common affliction among game developers, many of whom secretly yearn to see their work cross over into the more respected, glamorous medium.) The most likely explanation, I think, is that box office success is not Microsoft’s main goal with the Halo movie; instead, they need the movie to promote the Xbox 360.

Think about it: Set for release in Summer 2008 release, the Halo movie would come out a few months after Halo 3 (scheduled to go on sale in the 2007 holiday season), with the DVD available just in time for the 2008 holidays. All this would come at a time when Xbox 360’s current head-start advantage in the next generation console wars had long ended. A Halo movie would keep the Xbox momentum going at that most crucial time, while providing promotion and content throughout. (Think Halo movie trailers and excerpts downloadable only on Xbox Live, the Halo movie DVD packaged with Halo 3, and so on.)

If that theory is right, it doesn’t matter that much to Microsoft if the only people who watch a Halo movie are Xbox gamers, and it loses money at the box office. For the most part, the console market is already a loss leader competition; all Microsoft has to do is find a studio gullible enough to help them fund and distribute it. That, and an actor who’s willing to wear a face-obscuring outfit for a cult sci-fi project with limited mass market appeal. I’m thinking John Travolta.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Oh my God, Microsoft has to approve a script. Oh the humanity.
    i’d love to see a microsoft simulation based on the game, “RailRoad Tycoon”
    Can you imagine gaming against bill gates in this siumlation?

    Dude,
    jim Forbes

  2. Nerd Lifestyle Monday, October 23, 2006

    I think you might be selling them short in this case. The movie would likely deliver the very things that fans want to see, including some back story on Master Chief. Unless you’ve seen the screenplay, then you can’t assume that it’s going to suck. If Peter Jackson backs it, I can’t imagine it would.

  3. “If Peter Jackson backs it, I can’t imagine it would.”

    You haven’t seem King Kong. I LOVED LOTR; thought it deserved all kinds of Oscars but King Kong? Poor characters; horrible script. An embaressment.

  4. you underestimate the power of the halo. it’d be a good movie.

  5. Samiuela LV Taufa Thursday, October 26, 2006

    Battlefield Earth Rocks!!!

    Somehow, the mention of JT for an actor immediatley brought up BE.

    Imagine that ?(sarcasm)

    I’m no Scientologist, but I loved the film as a “B” film. I didn’t realise it was supposed to be an “A” film.

    Hopefully Microsoft isn’t trying to do a Sony, expanding from its base of operations into everything and not quite making the target anywhere anymore.

    I bought the PC version of the game, played it a little and found my PC inadequate and now it lives with the rest of the CD collection.

    If they do enough pseudo-martial arts, you never know how big those ‘after-box office’ flims can get. Jean-Claude Van Damme made a success of failures, but I sure hope that’s not the MS strategy, budgetting an “A”, going for a “B.”

    Thanks for the alternative view post,

    Sam T.

  6. I doubt that it will be used as a promotional toolfor the .360. As far as I am concerned it will be a great movie. A protagonist never has to be ‘likeable’, or sympathetic, no one even has to empathise with them, but I think for alot of people they could with master chief, and you will more than likely be able to see his face at some point. JEEZCHUZ CHRISCHT!

  7. • If any one has read any of the halo novels they would know that the halo universe is much deeper than its games show. The master chief is but a small part in the conflict. Many other characters have done more damage than the master chief.

    • Who ever said the movie included the master chief at all? The movie could be based on a conflict in the halo universe that has not been seen. Like a conflict early on in the war.

    If how ever the movie does follow the story of the battle on the Alpha halo then yes, the movie would suck. Must halo fans already know the story of the first game, and would know every twist.

Comments have been disabled for this post