<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friendster Gets Patent #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-727795</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-727795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They sure are...they're the biggest social network in asia and the 3rd largest social network on the planet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They sure are&#8230;they&#8217;re the biggest social network in asia and the 3rd largest social network on the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idea Buyer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-727612</link>
		<dc:creator>Idea Buyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-727612</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is friendster even still around? They had the market with both hands and lost a sure grip. Looks like they're scrambling to pick up a few pieces for their angry investors.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is friendster even still around? They had the market with both hands and lost a sure grip. Looks like they&#8217;re scrambling to pick up a few pieces for their angry investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Do we have to worry about the Friendster patents?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70434</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Do we have to worry about the Friendster patents?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70434</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] I&#8217;ve had to advise more than one client on the validity, importance and threat of Friendster&#8217;s &#8217;social networking patents&#8217;. [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve had to advise more than one client on the validity, importance and threat of Friendster&#8217;s &#8217;social networking patents&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nav</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70432</link>
		<dc:creator>Nav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70432</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;when you are in social networking business, bad reputation could take away users and kill you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I dont think friendster will take any legal actions directly but they have a weapon now and they will need to use it wisely.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when you are in social networking business, bad reputation could take away users and kill you.</p>
<p>I dont think friendster will take any legal actions directly but they have a weapon now and they will need to use it wisely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70430</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 07:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70430</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don't have time to read the patent, but I hope they are claiming the actual method of implementing such a system, not patenting the concept.  If the patent office allowed them to claim the concept, that is simply ridiculous.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have time to read the patent, but I hope they are claiming the actual method of implementing such a system, not patenting the concept.  If the patent office allowed them to claim the concept, that is simply ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve P</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70428</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70428</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;If you read the required elements of the claim,
  it is for a system where a second user provides
  content (e.g. a photo, video, etc) about a first
  user and if the second user isn’t a ‘friend’ of
  the first user (in terms of # of degrees), then
  the first user has to agree to the content being
  posted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is very close to what Facebook currently has.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>If you read the required elements of the claim,<br />
  it is for a system where a second user provides<br />
  content (e.g. a photo, video, etc) about a first<br />
  user and if the second user isn’t a ‘friend’ of<br />
  the first user (in terms of # of degrees), then<br />
  the first user has to agree to the content being<br />
  posted.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is very close to what Facebook currently has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kaspar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70426</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kaspar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70426</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@CoryS12&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;LinkedIn allows comments (appraisals) from other users that require approval by the user.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CoryS12</p>
<p>LinkedIn allows comments (appraisals) from other users that require approval by the user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristaps Kaupe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70424</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristaps Kaupe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70424</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Friendster patentē&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Labi, ka Eiropā nav legalizēti progammatūras patenti. Friendster ieguvuši kārtējo. Šoreiz par bilžu augšupielādi sociālajos tīklos un tās sasaistīšanu ar savu draugu lokā esošu personu. Būtībā lieta, ko uz patenta pieteikšanas&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Friendster patentē&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Labi, ka Eiropā nav legalizēti progammatūras patenti. Friendster ieguvuši kārtējo. Šoreiz par bilžu augšupielādi sociālajos tīklos un tās sasaistīšanu ar savu draugu lokā esošu personu. Būtībā lieta, ko uz patenta pieteikšanas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek And Poke</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70422</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek And Poke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70422</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Good Luck Friendster&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As no one can live without Friendster, we hope it will get a bunch if money out of the social and community related patents (see Techdirt or GigaOM)&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Good Luck Friendster&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As no one can live without Friendster, we hope it will get a bunch if money out of the social and community related patents (see Techdirt or GigaOM)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pwb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70420</link>
		<dc:creator>pwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70420</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good luck with that!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70418</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70418</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OK, let's break down what claim 1 really says.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you read the required elements of the claim, it is for a system where a second user provides content (e.g. a photo, video, etc) about a first user and if the second user isn't a 'friend' of the first user (in terms of # of degrees), then the first user has to agree to the content being posted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don't understand all the community elements of every social networking site, but of what I've seen, YouTube, MySpace, Flickr don't appear to do what is patented.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So this is a question for the reader group:  What site does that?  Specifically, who ASKS another user about content tagged to them, I can think of a few, but I'd be interested in the interpretation on how broad this claim really can be read.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, let&#8217;s break down what claim 1 really says.</p>
<p>If you read the required elements of the claim, it is for a system where a second user provides content (e.g. a photo, video, etc) about a first user and if the second user isn&#8217;t a &#8216;friend&#8217; of the first user (in terms of # of degrees), then the first user has to agree to the content being posted.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand all the community elements of every social networking site, but of what I&#8217;ve seen, YouTube, MySpace, Flickr don&#8217;t appear to do what is patented.  </p>
<p>So this is a question for the reader group:  What site does that?  Specifically, who ASKS another user about content tagged to them, I can think of a few, but I&#8217;d be interested in the interpretation on how broad this claim really can be read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kempton's blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70417</link>
		<dc:creator>Kempton's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70417</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Friendster and a really sick US patent system&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just read from Liz that Friendster has been granted a second social networking patent. Liz said, &#8220;The patent basically covers uploading a photo and associating it with someone you are connected to on an online social network. Friendster also cla&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Friendster and a really sick US patent system&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Just read from Liz that Friendster has been granted a second social networking patent. Liz said, &#8220;The patent basically covers uploading a photo and associating it with someone you are connected to on an online social network. Friendster also cla&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kempton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70416</link>
		<dc:creator>Kempton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70416</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The US patent system is truly sick and needs to be reformed asap.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not to defend the ridiculous of this situtation but patent office may simply be seriously lack of people to do a proper job. According to a former patent examiner, they only get about on average a day on a patent. See the length post (and the comment of this patent exminer) here,
http://kempton.ideasRevolution.com/2006/08/25/wikipedia-and-us-patent-trademark-office/#comments&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US patent system is truly sick and needs to be reformed asap.</p>
<p>Not to defend the ridiculous of this situtation but patent office may simply be seriously lack of people to do a proper job. According to a former patent examiner, they only get about on average a day on a patent. See the length post (and the comment of this patent exminer) here,<br />
 (<a href="http://kempton.ideasRevolution.com/2006/08/25/wikipedia-and-us-patent-trademark-office/#comments" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Headlines</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70415</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70415</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Patent Office Really Wants To Be Friendster's Friend&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Over the summer, Friendster received a very broad patent for social networking, even though it seemed&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Patent Office Really Wants To Be Friendster&#8217;s Friend&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Over the summer, Friendster received a very broad patent for social networking, even though it seemed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70413</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70413</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So I wonder when someone is going to go after YouTube for playing videos over the Internet&#8230;that must be patented somewhere too - I saw that being done in trials 10 years  ago!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I wonder when someone is going to go after YouTube for playing videos over the Internet&#8230;that must be patented somewhere too - I saw that being done in trials 10 years  ago!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve E</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70411</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/18/friendster-gets-patent-2/#comment-70411</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This 'concept' they've patented, has it never been done before? It seems so obvious I can't believe a social site of some sort over the years hasn't already done it, in which case shouldn't the patent be stripped from them? I guess finding who did it first could be a very difficult thing to do.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Craziness of the highest order!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8216;concept&#8217; they&#8217;ve patented, has it never been done before? It seems so obvious I can&#8217;t believe a social site of some sort over the years hasn&#8217;t already done it, in which case shouldn&#8217;t the patent be stripped from them? I guess finding who did it first could be a very difficult thing to do.</p>
<p>Craziness of the highest order!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
