23 Comments

Summary:

Friendster just wrote in to tell us it has been granted a second social networking patent. The patent basically covers uploading a photo and associating it with someone you are connected to on an online social network. Friendster also claims it should extend to “videos, audio, […]

Friendster just wrote in to tell us it has been granted a second social networking patent. The patent basically covers uploading a photo and associating it with someone you are connected to on an online social network. Friendster also claims it should extend to “videos, audio, comments, and any other content type, supported in public or private forums, within a social network.” There’s no comment so far about the company’s plans to pursue enforcement. Though people can’t stop rehashing its failures, Friendster is hoping it call pull Act II of the distraction campaign that won quite a lot of press and 10 million bucks from its VCs.

  1. Hopefully “Friendster” is a reader of comments, and they see this;

    I hope “Friendster” falls. I hope they fall so hard that they have no money to actually persue any legal claims.

    I am all for competition, but trying to block it by granting such an open patent is beyond reasonable. Why don’t they just patent actual relationships and require that anyone who has a friend must pay royalty, or assess fees on marriages?

    Purely stupid, and I wish the worst of luck to “Friendster”.

    Share
  2. maybe they’re doing everybody a favor by shedding light on how ridiculous software patents can be…

    Share
  3. No matter, but they can make a shit load of money enforcing the patent. Read this: TVI versus Microsoft – The Autoplay Case .

    Share
  4. You gotta be kidding me. Like no one has ever thought of doing this before??? The patent office has reached new heights of ridiculousness.

    Share
  5. Good for friendster, one step closer to begin the legal onslaught.

    First step, estimate legal cost for both sides.

    Step two, find optimization point.

    Step three, offer a license.

    Step four, sue the idiots who do not realize the cost effectiveness of a license.

    Step five, founders enroll in marketing classes :)

    Share
  6. This ‘concept’ they’ve patented, has it never been done before? It seems so obvious I can’t believe a social site of some sort over the years hasn’t already done it, in which case shouldn’t the patent be stripped from them? I guess finding who did it first could be a very difficult thing to do.

    Craziness of the highest order!

    Share
  7. So I wonder when someone is going to go after YouTube for playing videos over the Internet…that must be patented somewhere too – I saw that being done in trials 10 years ago!

    Share
  8. Patent Office Really Wants To Be Friendster’s Friend…

    Over the summer, Friendster received a very broad patent for social networking, even though it seemed…

    Share
  9. The US patent system is truly sick and needs to be reformed asap.

    Not to defend the ridiculous of this situtation but patent office may simply be seriously lack of people to do a proper job. According to a former patent examiner, they only get about on average a day on a patent. See the length post (and the comment of this patent exminer) here,
    http://kempton.ideasRevolution.com/2006/08/25/wikipedia-and-us-patent-trademark-office/#comments

    Share
  10. Friendster and a really sick US patent system…

    Just read from Liz that Friendster has been granted a second social networking patent. Liz said, “The patent basically covers uploading a photo and associating it with someone you are connected to on an online social network. Friendster also cla…

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post