<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sequoia Goes PopSugar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sugar Publishing Buys ShopStyle, Changes Name &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-581290</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugar Publishing Buys ShopStyle, Changes Name &#171; GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-581290</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Brian Sugar have turned their little hobby, PopSugar, into a full blown publishing company. With backing from Sequoia Capital and NBC, Sugar Publishing has become a leading destination for young [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brian Sugar have turned their little hobby, PopSugar, into a full blown publishing company. With backing from Sequoia Capital and NBC, Sugar Publishing has become a leading destination for young [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70209</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70209</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;There's Lot of Ad Pie for the Rest of Us&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More evidence of the Google Juggernaut comes from an eMarketer report that the search behemoth will account for 25%, or $4-billion, of the U.S. online ad market this year. That's truly impressive and explains why Google sports a market capitalization &#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>There&#8217;s Lot of Ad Pie for the Rest of Us&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>More evidence of the Google Juggernaut comes from an eMarketer report that the search behemoth will account for 25%, or $4-billion, of the U.S. online ad market this year. That&#8217;s truly impressive and explains why Google sports a market capitalization &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emre Sokullu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70208</link>
		<dc:creator>Emre Sokullu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70208</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ Khang Toh
It’s really hard for me to accept the fact that popsugar is worth the 5mil. How did they come up with the valuation.
They are looking to drop 1-2mil on ideas that is seem more complex and high tech than popsugar is doing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Web business is more viral marketing than pure technology. Even Google is not valuated solely after its technology. What was the difference between Google Videos and YouTube? Technology? No.. Only marketing success, and they valuated it at $1.65B.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Khang Toh<br />
It’s really hard for me to accept the fact that popsugar is worth the 5mil. How did they come up with the valuation.<br />
They are looking to drop 1-2mil on ideas that is seem more complex and high tech than popsugar is doing.</p>
<p>Web business is more viral marketing than pure technology. Even Google is not valuated solely after its technology. What was the difference between Google Videos and YouTube? Technology? No.. Only marketing success, and they valuated it at $1.65B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDruskoff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70206</link>
		<dc:creator>MDruskoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70206</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sequoia must see that the very same big media players PopSugar competes with now make excellent potential acquirers. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CondeNast et al could buy Sugar Publishing and, in one fell swoop, acquire a hip, new vehicle for its clients to market through.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Blogs are about content, not platform. That would make it an easy acq. for big outfits already experienced in managing a portfolio of hundreds or thousands of different titles.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sequoia must see that the very same big media players PopSugar competes with now make excellent potential acquirers. </p>
<p>CondeNast et al could buy Sugar Publishing and, in one fell swoop, acquire a hip, new vehicle for its clients to market through.</p>
<p>Blogs are about content, not platform. That would make it an easy acq. for big outfits already experienced in managing a portfolio of hundreds or thousands of different titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70204</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70204</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is great news for blogs!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, comScore Media Metrix reports PopSugar has 400,000 UNIQUE VISITORS not 1.5 million- and declining month to month???&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;May be 1.5 million total visitors (not unique) That makes PopSugar one of the good blogs but way behind some great ones with larger reach. You check out are: USWeekly Blog (3x PopSugar) JustJared (2x PopSugar) TheBosh (2x PopSugar) and the People Magazine Blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news for blogs!</p>
<p>BTW, comScore Media Metrix reports PopSugar has 400,000 UNIQUE VISITORS not 1.5 million- and declining month to month???</p>
<p>May be 1.5 million total visitors (not unique) That makes PopSugar one of the good blogs but way behind some great ones with larger reach. You check out are: USWeekly Blog (3x PopSugar) JustJared (2x PopSugar) TheBosh (2x PopSugar) and the People Magazine Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70202</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70202</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;..and business model? how will Sequoia and other investors get a return?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..and business model? how will Sequoia and other investors get a return?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70200</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70200</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;one of the fastest growing properties on the Internet&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/blockquote&gt;


&lt;p&gt;I know trying to judge a website's traffic growth from toolbar vendor's data is not accurate but still popsugar.com is flat in  ask.com's websearch ranking&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://ranking.websearch.com/TrankTrend.aspx?url=www.popsugar.com&#38;period=3&#38;size=1&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Alexa shows slight growth but hey everyone knows its skewed towards the geek demographic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>one of the fastest growing properties on the Internet</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I know trying to judge a website&#8217;s traffic growth from toolbar vendor&#8217;s data is not accurate but still popsugar.com is flat in  ask.com&#8217;s websearch ranking</p>
<p> (<a href="http://ranking.websearch.com/TrankTrend.aspx?url=www.popsugar.com&amp;period=3&amp;size=1" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
<p>Alexa shows slight growth but hey everyone knows its skewed towards the geek demographic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70198</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 03:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70198</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It doesn't sound like they're purchasing the site, but rather investing that money into the company to spend on marketing / infrastructure / partnership deals as opposed to just rights to own the company.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t sound like they&#8217;re purchasing the site, but rather investing that money into the company to spend on marketing / infrastructure / partnership deals as opposed to just rights to own the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khang Toh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70197</link>
		<dc:creator>Khang Toh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/sequoia-goes-popsugar/#comment-70197</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It's really hard for me to accept the fact that popsugar is worth the 5mil. How did they come up with the valuation. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om&#8230; you're from B2.0 and I think you should be familiar with the article that B2.0 published just a while back about 10 ideas VC are looking to invest. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are looking to drop 1-2mil on ideas that is seem more complex and high tech than popsugar is doing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really hard for me to accept the fact that popsugar is worth the 5mil. How did they come up with the valuation. </p>
<p>Om&#8230; you&#8217;re from B2.0 and I think you should be familiar with the article that B2.0 published just a while back about 10 ideas VC are looking to invest. </p>
<p>They are looking to drop 1-2mil on ideas that is seem more complex and high tech than popsugar is doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
