Comments on: T-Mobile US Launching 3G, Finally

By: TECHOGNIZED » Blog Archive » Next Generation Mobile Device / “Killer App” (May 08)

Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:21:07 +0000

[...] 6. GigaOM – T-Mobile 3G Rollout http://gigaom.com/2006/10/06/t-mobile/ 7. Wired – Darpa Kills “LifeLog” [...]

By: Jesse Kopelman

Jesse Kopelman — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:00:36 +0000

Emanuel, the same people who make GSM stuff make UMA stuff. If I remember correctly, T-Mobile is getting the network side stuff from Alcatel. I'm sure they will eventually have a few handset vendors, but Nokia may be the first.

By: Emanuel

Emanuel — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:18:54 +0000

The better question to emerge from this article is: Who are the vendors who will benefit from the rollout of UMA and Fixed Mobile Convergence (FMC). Obviuosly new gear, routers and gateways etc, are needed for this. Any ideas?

By: Josh

Josh — Sat, 07 Oct 2006 20:28:16 +0000

The post by Ashutosh is very accurate and it made me laugh. It took forever for people to start using SMS in the US.

T-Mobile is smart for deploying the UMA solution first.Every carrier of them has issues supplying coverage in buildings. High Floors, Basements, and IT Server Rooms can be challenging to try to cover. UMA should make it easier to fix coverage issues. This will help them grow their coporate customer base. Another thing I am curious to learn is if T-Mobile will allow users to use UMA outside the US. This could help eliminate international roaming charges. I will be surprised if other carriers do not jump on this band wagon.

Another point is that when traditional networks get congested UMA would be nice to have. Yeah 3g and 4g are nice but WiFi is ready- now!

By: Ram

Ram — Sat, 07 Oct 2006 19:32:10 +0000

Leapfrogging to 4G sounds good on paper - the key is availability of handsets. When will we have comparable number and choice of 4G handsets similar to 3G handsets? It is still years away. 4G is only for data only, which is why I don't see a lot of pickup until 4G handsets become available to support voice.

The question here is what is T-mobile going to do about indoor coverage?

By: Adam Lindsay

Adam Lindsay — Sat, 07 Oct 2006 11:57:44 +0000

I don't think they are too late. I think they are for the average reader of this site, but I firmly believe in supply and demand. If the US citizens wanted 3G, we would have had it by now. Most people I come across though are still figuring out text messages. Thats only been around since when '95?

What I do love is that, none of the carriers have learned, and we are still getting a slew of different technologies. EV-DO, WiMax, HDSPA, not mention existing EDGE, GPRS. This should make it easier to sell to users. sarcasm

By: Ashutosh

Ashutosh — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 23:13:15 +0000

does 3G mean that we won't see the "signal faded" message or calls dropping anymore? and when I press talk button, will the receiving phone ring immediately? because these 2 features are what i am waiting on..

By: Esme

Esme — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 22:08:35 +0000

T-Mobile’s HSDPA launch in the Netherlands was not as successful as they had hoped. Initially, the goal was to lure away (voice) customers from other mobile carriers (and of course to keep existing T-Mobile voice subscribers from migrating to competitors). After a few months, T-Mobile gave up and said anyone, including those who are not T-Mobile voice subscribers, could get HSDPA service. Another change: initially they were going to bill people by the number of megabytes they send and receive, but they also gave up on that. Now they have different tiers of service — flat fee depending on the speed of the connection. The cheapest 9.50 EUR per month is “dial-up” (64Kbps down – 16 Kbps up) and the most expensive 1.8 Mbps down – 384 Kbps up) is 69.50 EUR.

By: Michael Vu

Michael Vu — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:18:51 +0000

Late or not, the Sidekick + 3G + wifi = a vicious combination. If the new Sidekick 3 was using 3G technology, their sales would have been much, much higher.

By: sunil

sunil — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 19:15:02 +0000

Uh, T-Mo is late because of the lack of spectrum. AWS auction fixed it and they're building out the national network based on 3G stuff. 4G has yet to be defined really. Though Sprint's WiMAX is labeled 4G, it's not really.

No one makes 4G gear yet. They are planning for big time download speeds. Should be HSUPA out of the gun instead of HSDPA ideally.

I think Sprint is spending $2.1B for their WiMAX network and they don't have a national footprint. $2.6+B gives you a 3G national footprint by the end of 08. Not bad - pretty aggressive for T-Mo. Let's hope they execute cleanly.

By: Erik

Erik — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:54:53 +0000

Because T-Mo is late to the 3G game, why don't just skip 3G and start on a 4G network. That way they don't spend nmoney playing catch up to continue to be 4th place in the US. Can the spectrum they just bought be used for 4G speeds? What are the technology hurdles for 4G? Will WiFi become more ubiquitous, lessening the need for high speed cellular networks? All I know is that I want T-Mo to offer the Nokia E70 with the UMA feature enabled.

By: Gerald Buckley

Gerald Buckley — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:47:52 +0000

The best news in this whole article (besides the timeline) is C. Zeta Jones is out… She's always given me the creeps.