<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is there no Skype Mobile?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carl Clopton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-870851</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Clopton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-870851</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I use Skype in / Skype out for my business and have lots of phone in numbers for various parts of the world that all ring on my laptops.  This is great but I would alos like to use my Dell Axim x51v on WM 5 with the Enfora GSM/GPRS Compact Flash Card, does anyone know if this will work with Skype?  Skype says it must be 3G.  I don't think the Enfora GSM/GPRS Compact Flash Card will support 3G, but could it work with a data sim card inside?  I know that I will have to use the extra large batteries and it will use them up fast, that I am OK with, these batteries are cheap.  Any thoughts on this?  thanks for your time :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Skype in / Skype out for my business and have lots of phone in numbers for various parts of the world that all ring on my laptops.  This is great but I would alos like to use my Dell Axim x51v on WM 5 with the Enfora GSM/GPRS Compact Flash Card, does anyone know if this will work with Skype?  Skype says it must be 3G.  I don&#8217;t think the Enfora GSM/GPRS Compact Flash Card will support 3G, but could it work with a data sim card inside?  I know that I will have to use the extra large batteries and it will use them up fast, that I am OK with, these batteries are cheap.  Any thoughts on this?  thanks for your time :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valto</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-513593</link>
		<dc:creator>Valto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-513593</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just last week we did a quick test of various solutions for using Skype or other VoIP solutions from mobile phone to save in our international calls done while driving, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We selected Jajah and Mobivox as our choices in addition to using just Skype.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wrote the whole selection process to my blog at: http://4startups.blogspot.com/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just last week we did a quick test of various solutions for using Skype or other VoIP solutions from mobile phone to save in our international calls done while driving, etc.</p>
<p>We selected Jajah and Mobivox as our choices in addition to using just Skype.</p>
<p>I wrote the whole selection process to my blog at:  (<a href="http://4startups.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Straub</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65983</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Straub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65983</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;(( truphone )) I think is a good solution for Skype like VoIP experience as best as it can get modeling the existing phone behaviour. I have tried it since several months on my Nokia E60 and it is amazing. My MNO bill has dropped by 70%.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(( truphone )) I think is a good solution for Skype like VoIP experience as best as it can get modeling the existing phone behaviour. I have tried it since several months on my Nokia E60 and it is amazing. My MNO bill has dropped by 70%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohammed Jubaer Arif</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65982</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohammed Jubaer Arif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65982</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am new to VoIP and got a question here:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When you say
"running it a pure peer-to-peer client is just not possible on many of today’s networks"
I am not getting what are the problems Skype is going to face with current network and how do 3G solves them?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With care
Arif.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am new to VoIP and got a question here:</p>
<p>When you say<br />
&#8220;running it a pure peer-to-peer client is just not possible on many of today’s networks&#8221;<br />
I am not getting what are the problems Skype is going to face with current network and how do 3G solves them?</p>
<p>With care<br />
Arif.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebhelyesfarku</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65981</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebhelyesfarku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65981</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;"To use Skype on yoru mobile means you have to be logged in to your 3g connection so you can’t get impromptu calls."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ted Avery you are clueless. On UTMS you can have data connection and voice call simultaneously.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;To use Skype on yoru mobile means you have to be logged in to your 3g connection so you can’t get impromptu calls.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ted Avery you are clueless. On UTMS you can have data connection and voice call simultaneously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas4493</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65980</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas4493</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65980</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What people forget is there is no free lunch.  Any web feature is either something you pay for (or somebody pays for) in terms of fees, or you have advertising. I suppose I could add Bubble 2.0 'products' that are funded in essence by the gamble that Yahoo/Google/Microsoft will buy the company.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So&#8230; Skype has no fees for on-net calling, and it has no servers handling call switching etc. Instead it uses processing from the callers' PCs.  It still had developers and reg servers to pay for.  So SkypeOut has fees because it costs real money to terminate calls onto PSTNs and wireless networks.  And maybe that covered the other costs, because there were no other sources of revenue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While Skype has no infrastructure costs this is not the case for SIP.  SIP needs relatively heavyweight servers to perform the caller lookup, handshaking, and connectivity (though not to carry traffic).  So on-net calls via SIP cannot be entirely free, whereas the same calls on Skype can be.  At least until the P2PSIP recommendations have been made real - then at that point in the future SIP looks like Skype and can have costs like Skype.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What people forget is there is no free lunch.  Any web feature is either something you pay for (or somebody pays for) in terms of fees, or you have advertising. I suppose I could add Bubble 2.0 &#8216;products&#8217; that are funded in essence by the gamble that Yahoo/Google/Microsoft will buy the company.</p>
<p>So&#8230; Skype has no fees for on-net calling, and it has no servers handling call switching etc. Instead it uses processing from the callers&#8217; PCs.  It still had developers and reg servers to pay for.  So SkypeOut has fees because it costs real money to terminate calls onto PSTNs and wireless networks.  And maybe that covered the other costs, because there were no other sources of revenue.</p>
<p>While Skype has no infrastructure costs this is not the case for SIP.  SIP needs relatively heavyweight servers to perform the caller lookup, handshaking, and connectivity (though not to carry traffic).  So on-net calls via SIP cannot be entirely free, whereas the same calls on Skype can be.  At least until the P2PSIP recommendations have been made real - then at that point in the future SIP looks like Skype and can have costs like Skype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Oberle</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65979</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Oberle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65979</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;About all this mobile devices becoming supernodes: Skype phones will obviously not become supernodes. There are enough PC to play the role of supernodes, would make no sense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW supernodes are not the bandwith consumer that everybody talks about (but that's another subject).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;NB: I'm an engineer at Skype&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About all this mobile devices becoming supernodes: Skype phones will obviously not become supernodes. There are enough PC to play the role of supernodes, would make no sense.</p>
<p>BTW supernodes are not the bandwith consumer that everybody talks about (but that&#8217;s another subject).</p>
<p>NB: I&#8217;m an engineer at Skype</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65978</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65978</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;casey&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;that is my bad. i was writing this while waiting to change flights. so overlooked a few things. errors are regretted and will try harder next time around.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>casey</p>
<p>that is my bad. i was writing this while waiting to change flights. so overlooked a few things. errors are regretted and will try harder next time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas4493</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65977</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas4493</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65977</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To Niels's point: Skype (or an equivalent bypass technology) became popular over fixed wireline when it was much cheaper, simple to use, and good enough quality.  The same will apply to wireless: the combination of lower cost, simplicity, and reasonable quality will be the catalyst for Skype or a competitive VoIP bypass provider to become popular.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om's question was if Skype had architectural challenges that would impede those catalysts.  The answer is probably yes - in that Skype on mobile phones would need to leech off the processing power of desktop PCs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Niels&#8217;s point: Skype (or an equivalent bypass technology) became popular over fixed wireline when it was much cheaper, simple to use, and good enough quality.  The same will apply to wireless: the combination of lower cost, simplicity, and reasonable quality will be the catalyst for Skype or a competitive VoIP bypass provider to become popular.</p>
<p>Om&#8217;s question was if Skype had architectural challenges that would impede those catalysts.  The answer is probably yes - in that Skype on mobile phones would need to leech off the processing power of desktop PCs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65976</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65976</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love this site and read it religiously, but where is the proof-reading? I found at least two grammar errors while reading this article alone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this site and read it religiously, but where is the proof-reading? I found at least two grammar errors while reading this article alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels Gammelgard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65975</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels Gammelgard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65975</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why would anyone really care about mobile Skype, more than nerds. And nerds don't speak anyway, or&#8230;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I want my phone to work. Period. Also, money is not really the option anymore. I have an all I can eat subscription anyway (including broadband and VOIP) for my private phone and my company mobile has free internal calls.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;//Niels&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone really care about mobile Skype, more than nerds. And nerds don&#8217;t speak anyway, or&#8230;?</p>
<p>I want my phone to work. Period. Also, money is not really the option anymore. I have an all I can eat subscription anyway (including broadband and VOIP) for my private phone and my company mobile has free internal calls.</p>
<p>//Niels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajAT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65974</link>
		<dc:creator>rajAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 05:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65974</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Spokn (www.spokn.com) a Hyderabad, India based company has developed skype for mobile phone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spokn (www.spokn.com) a Hyderabad, India based company has developed skype for mobile phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francisco</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65973</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 00:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65973</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mobile Skype is already deployed in Sony Mylo.
However this is not a CDMA/GSM phone. It is rather a PDA with Skype capabilty. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No good. You need Mylo AND your normal cell phone. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is why Mylo will fade.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mobile Skype is already deployed in Sony Mylo.<br />
However this is not a CDMA/GSM phone. It is rather a PDA with Skype capabilty. </p>
<p>No good. You need Mylo AND your normal cell phone. </p>
<p>This is why Mylo will fade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravish</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65972</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 03:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65972</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am in India and I oftenly make calls to my friends &#38; relatives in US &#38; Canada. It costs me around $0.16 per minute to make international calls and I have to pay a huge security deposit to my cellular company to activate my International Calling.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand&#8230; I use fring on my cell phone with a $12 per month unlimited GPRS data plan. This allows me to make free calls to other fring, Gtalk or Skype users and $0.021 per minute for Skypeout calls to landline or cell phones.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The VOIP option is much more feasible &#38; affordable to me. If VOIP Buster could launch a mobile application, I would be able to make free calls to Landlines &#38; Cell phones as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in India and I oftenly make calls to my friends &amp; relatives in US &amp; Canada. It costs me around $0.16 per minute to make international calls and I have to pay a huge security deposit to my cellular company to activate my International Calling.</p>
<p>On the other hand&#8230; I use fring on my cell phone with a $12 per month unlimited GPRS data plan. This allows me to make free calls to other fring, Gtalk or Skype users and $0.021 per minute for Skypeout calls to landline or cell phones.</p>
<p>The VOIP option is much more feasible &amp; affordable to me. If VOIP Buster could launch a mobile application, I would be able to make free calls to Landlines &amp; Cell phones as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas4493</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65971</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas4493</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65971</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can Skype run on cell phones? The answer is yes, if the phone has 400MHz cpu, runs Windows Mobile 5, and it's on a real 3G network, or WiFi (UMA should be ok).  On GPRS with 5 data slots typically only one is for upload 13.4kbps, which is really too low for even the iLBC codec that Skype uses.  EDGE takes it up to a shade under 60kbps for upload.  But it's not optimized: iLBC is packet-based whereas cellphones use bit-error correcting transports.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is it legal? Probably not - Cingular and Verizon both have terms of service prohibiting VoIP traffic.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;QoS - yeah well you might need that between you and the cell tower if you were doing something gnarly in terms of bandwidth at the same time as placing a Skype call. But after the tower, it's not needed. Not diving into QoS debates here but QoS assists to ration scarce bandwidth, once it's not scarce the impact of QoS is small.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you do the math for a $49.99 US cellphone data plan and calculate it for 1350 or 6000 minutes of use it works out that this is cheaper than the equivalent cellphone voice plan. Add in International calls and the savings are 50% or more, even assuming Skypeout costs to terminate to the PSTN.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is Skypeout cheaper than Mobile night-time or in-Carrier or in-family minutes which are 'free'?  No, but that's before you add in the base rate of the voice plan that got you those 'free' minutes. Add in all the costs and Skype (which incidentally is not at all the cheapest VoIP bypass service) is cheaper.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Skype run on cell phones? The answer is yes, if the phone has 400MHz cpu, runs Windows Mobile 5, and it&#8217;s on a real 3G network, or WiFi (UMA should be ok).  On GPRS with 5 data slots typically only one is for upload 13.4kbps, which is really too low for even the iLBC codec that Skype uses.  EDGE takes it up to a shade under 60kbps for upload.  But it&#8217;s not optimized: iLBC is packet-based whereas cellphones use bit-error correcting transports.</p>
<p>Is it legal? Probably not - Cingular and Verizon both have terms of service prohibiting VoIP traffic.  </p>
<p>QoS - yeah well you might need that between you and the cell tower if you were doing something gnarly in terms of bandwidth at the same time as placing a Skype call. But after the tower, it&#8217;s not needed. Not diving into QoS debates here but QoS assists to ration scarce bandwidth, once it&#8217;s not scarce the impact of QoS is small.</p>
<p>If you do the math for a $49.99 US cellphone data plan and calculate it for 1350 or 6000 minutes of use it works out that this is cheaper than the equivalent cellphone voice plan. Add in International calls and the savings are 50% or more, even assuming Skypeout costs to terminate to the PSTN.</p>
<p>Is Skypeout cheaper than Mobile night-time or in-Carrier or in-family minutes which are &#8216;free&#8217;?  No, but that&#8217;s before you add in the base rate of the voice plan that got you those &#8216;free&#8217; minutes. Add in all the costs and Skype (which incidentally is not at all the cheapest VoIP bypass service) is cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rukna</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65970</link>
		<dc:creator>rukna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/why-is-there-no-skype-mobile/#comment-65970</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thats what the technology is for. solve the problems&#8230; have faith in a few years everybody will be using a skype phone&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats what the technology is for. solve the problems&#8230; have faith in a few years everybody will be using a skype phone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
