<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile ESPN: Grounded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/09/28/espn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/28/espn/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:25:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/28/espn/#comment-65863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/28/espn/#comment-65863</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t see this effecting the cable guys. I don&#039;t think they will be marketing cellular as a standalone service, but as part of a bundle. This pretty much what they do with voice -- does anyone have Comcast phone and none of their other services? Since the cellular will be pretty much a defensive play agains 4-Play from AT&amp;T and Verizon, they only need it to break even -- not be profitable, like traditional MVNO. Also note that their is a potential symbiotic relationship between cable, with its fiber assets, and Sprint that is just not there with the likes of Helio or ESPN Mobile.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see this effecting the cable guys. I don&#8217;t think they will be marketing cellular as a standalone service, but as part of a bundle. This pretty much what they do with voice &#8212; does anyone have Comcast phone and none of their other services? Since the cellular will be pretty much a defensive play agains 4-Play from AT&amp;T and Verizon, they only need it to break even &#8212; not be profitable, like traditional MVNO. Also note that their is a potential symbiotic relationship between cable, with its fiber assets, and Sprint that is just not there with the likes of Helio or ESPN Mobile.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: el-duderino</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/28/espn/#comment-65862</link>
		<dc:creator>el-duderino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/28/espn/#comment-65862</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, that&#039;s too bad.  I loved my ESPN service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that&#8217;s too bad.  I loved my ESPN service.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/28/espn/#comment-65861</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/28/espn/#comment-65861</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think Helio will join them anytime soon. They have a ton of money to spend from their parent, SK Telecom. ESPN will still have a prescence in the mobile world. We&#039;ll have to see how MVNOs rethink their strategies. My thoughts here: www.5bars.net&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Helio will join them anytime soon. They have a ton of money to spend from their parent, SK Telecom. ESPN will still have a prescence in the mobile world. We&#8217;ll have to see how MVNOs rethink their strategies. My thoughts here: <a href="http://www.5bars.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.5bars.net</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/28/espn/#comment-65860</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/28/espn/#comment-65860</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Helio will be next! Unless they&#039;re stubborn and choose to bleed to death&#8230; MVNOs (re-cellulars) will only survive as bargain and/or pre-pay services like Virgin Mobile. We don&#039;t need overpriced content niche offerings. If I want sports content, I&#039;ll do Sprint TV, Orb, or Slingbox and some web surfing to WAP pages for scores and news. ESPN never had a chance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helio will be next! Unless they&#8217;re stubborn and choose to bleed to death&#8230; MVNOs (re-cellulars) will only survive as bargain and/or pre-pay services like Virgin Mobile. We don&#8217;t need overpriced content niche offerings. If I want sports content, I&#8217;ll do Sprint TV, Orb, or Slingbox and some web surfing to WAP pages for scores and news. ESPN never had a chance.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
